Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

docs-seo

Audit and improve the discoverability of the timepicker-ui documentation site (docs-app/) across the full modern discoverability stack — SEO (ranking), AEO (answer engines / featured snippets), GEO (citations inside ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity/Claude), and AIO (Google AI Overviews). Use when the user wants to optimize docs SEO, improve Google ranking/positioning, win featured snippets or AI-answer boxes, get the docs cited by AI engines, add or fix sitemap/robots/manifest, fill in page metadata, add Open Graph/Twitter cards, answer-first copy, or JSON-LD (FAQPage/SoftwareApplication/TechArticle/BreadcrumbList). Drives the seo-optimizer subagent with an audit → approve → apply flow.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Docs Discoverability (SEO + AEO + GEO + AIO)

Make docs-app/ (the Next.js 16 documentation site for timepicker-ui) found, read, and cited by people, search crawlers, and AI answer engines — so it is the answer a developer, Google, and ChatGPT all reach for when someone wants a time picker. This skill is a thin orchestrator: the real work is done by the seo-optimizer subagent (which covers the full four-layer stack, not just classic SEO). The skill exists to manage the human approval gate the subagent can't do itself.

Default production URL: https://timepicker-ui.vercel.app (use unless the user gives another).

This is a fully public open-source site: everything here is meant to be indexed and cited. There is no private data and no protected branding. The subagent's guardrail is truthfulness (never describe a feature the library lacks) and quality (no AI slop), not privacy.

Arguments (optional)

  • A focus area narrows the run, e.g. /docs-seo metadata, /docs-seo sitemap, /docs-seo structured-data, /docs-seo opengraph, /docs-seo aeo (answer-first + FAQ), /docs-seo geo (entity footprint + citations). No argument = full audit of all layers.
  • --apply-all skips the per-area approval prompt and applies every audited change (still reports at the end). Use only when the user explicitly wants unattended changes.

Workflow

Phase 1 — Audit (read-only)

Dispatch the seo-optimizer subagent (Task tool, subagent_type: seo-optimizer) in audit mode. Brief it with the production URL and the focus area (if any), and tell it to discover the current state for itself rather than trusting any baseline — what was missing last run may already be fixed. Ask it to return a prioritized, file-level change plan grouped into:

  1. SEO — technical files (sitemap / robots / manifest / metadataBase)
  2. SEO — per-page metadata (the missing/duplicate titles + descriptions)
  3. SEO — root + Open Graph / Twitter (+ OG image)
  4. AEO — answer-first copy + question-formatted headings + FAQPage on Q&A pages
  5. GEO — consistent entity footprint + concrete facts + SoftwareApplication/JSON-LD
  6. AIO / AI-crawler / Core Web Vitals flags (llms.txt + robots AI user-agents are the owner's call; default is to welcome AI crawlers on a public OSS site)

The subagent's own definition already sets the checks below — this is the reminder to put in its brief, not a second source of truth (if the agent's rules change, its file wins).

  • Today's date from your context: the agent has no Bash to look it up.
  • Check the web first in audit mode (in apply mode only when an approved item rests on a fact it doubts). Use today's date from the brief and web-search the current best practice across all four layers — Next.js APIs, Google ranking + AI-slop + AI-features guidance, AEO/GEO/AIO tactics, the AI-crawler / llms.txt state — rather than optimizing from memory. Live sources win over anything hardcoded; it cites sources + dates.
  • Run the AI-slop check on text AND icons in both modes. Scan existing and proposed titles/descriptions/ FAQ copy for slop and long dashes (—/–), and the SEO/OG surface for stray Unicode emojis or native/system icons (the site draws its few icons as inline SVG in components/icons.tsx; emoji/native icons are a defect to flag, not ship).

It makes NO edits in this phase.

Phase 2 — Present & approve (gate)

Relay the audit plan to the user concisely (counts + the concrete titles/descriptions/FAQ Q&A and files per group). Then use AskUserQuestion to let the user choose which groups (and, where it matters, which items) to apply. AskUserQuestion caps at 4 options per question, so present the six groups as a multi-select batched into two questions when needed, then a follow-up for item-level choices where it matters. This is a mandatory gate — do not skip it unless --apply-all was passed. Capture the approved set.

Phase 3 — Apply

Dispatch the seo-optimizer subagent again in apply mode with the exact approved list (files + the decided titles/descriptions/answer-first copy/structured data). It implements the changes under docs-app/ using real Next 16 typed APIs, keeping titles/descriptions unique, on-keyword, answer-first where it's a docs page, and written like a human — short, specific, no AI slop, no long dashes, and no emojis/native icons (the site's own SVG icons or none). It keeps the entity footprint consistent across hero copy, metadata, OG, and JSON-LD.

Phase 4 — Verify & report

  • Run cd docs-app && npm run build to confirm the site still builds, then /verify per HARD RULES §5. Report pass/fail honestly with output.
  • Summarize what changed, grouped by the six areas, with the file list.
  • Give the manual verification checklist: open /sitemap.xml, /robots.txt, /manifest.webmanifest; view-source a couple of routes for <title>, OG/Twitter tags, and JSON-LD; validate structured data with Google Rich Results Test / Schema.org validator. Note that AEO/GEO wins (featured snippets, AI-Overview appearance, ChatGPT/Perplexity citations) show up over time and are tracked separately from classic rankings.
  • Note that git is the user's job — propose a commit message but do not commit.

Guardrails

  • The subagent edits ONLY docs-app/; it never touches the library in app/ or dist/.
  • Truthfulness over reach. Metadata, keywords, FAQ answers, and JSON-LD must match the real library — a fabricated fact is what gets the entity distrusted by AI engines and demoted by Google. When unsure a feature exists, verify against app/src/types/options.d.ts or the docs.
  • Don't regress existing good metadata/JSON-LD — extend it (FAQ/TechArticle JSON-LD already ships).
  • Best practices are re-derived live in every audit from today's real date, never from memory or a hardcoded year — for all four layers. An audit today and one months from now both research the current guidance.
  • The generated copy is human, short, slop-free: no filler openers or empty intensifiers, no keyword stuffing, no long dashes (—/–, use short hyphens), and no Unicode emojis or native icons (use the SVG icons in components/icons.tsx, or none).
  • Keep this skill, the agent file and docs-app/ files in CRLF; otherwise follow docs-app's own conventions.
  • One run optimizes discoverability; it does not redesign the site. Visual/content rewrites beyond SEO/answer-first copy belong to the docs-site agent.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a11y

Free

Audit and improve the accessibility of the timepicker-ui LIBRARY (app/src) - ARIA, keyboard operability, focus trap/management, screen-reader announcements, labels - against WCAG 2.2 AA and the WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices. Use when the user wants an a11y audit/fix of the picker itself (clock, wheel, plugins, modal, inputs). Drives the accessibility subagent in an audit → approve → apply flow. Does NOT cover docs-app (use /docs-a11y for that).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pglejzer/timepicker-ui100Updated Oct 17, 2026

Audit and improve the accessibility of the timepicker-ui documentation site (docs-app/) - landmarks, heading order, skip links, keyboard nav, focus management in the command menu / sidebar / dialogs, color contrast, alt text, ARIA on custom components (tabs, native dialogs), reduced motion - against WCAG 2.2 AA. Use when the user wants an a11y audit/fix of the docs site. Drives the docs-accessibility subagent in an audit → approve → apply flow. Does NOT cover the library (use /a11y for that).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pglejzer/timepicker-ui100Updated Oct 17, 2026

Cut a new timepicker-ui release. Use when the user wants to bump the version, prepare a release, write/update the changelog, or sync version + changelog across README, CHANGELOG.md and the docs-app (changelog/what's-new/version strings). Drives the build-release subagent in an audit → approve → apply flow, then runs a sanity build. Does NOT git-commit/tag or npm-publish — proposes those for the user to run.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pglejzer/timepicker-ui100Updated Oct 17, 2026

Full repository maintenance pipeline that orchestrates all project agents in sequence - code review, accessibility, bundle size, security, API stability, test coverage, ecosystem, and release preparation. Acts as a quality gate before publishing or merging major changes. Use when: maintenance, health check, pre-release audit, quality gate, full pipeline, repo health, pre-merge check, release readiness, audit all.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pglejzer/timepicker-ui100Updated Oct 17, 2026

verify

Free

Browser-check what a change could have broken in timepicker-ui (library demo and docs-app, before/after). Use at the end of a task that changed library behavior or styles (app/src) or docs-app pages, or when the user asks to check that nothing broke. Not for demo examples in app/docs, copy/typo/comment edits or one-line fixes (HARD RULES §5 in CLAUDE.md). Main agent only, never delegated to a subagent.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pglejzer/timepicker-ui100Updated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by pglejzer

Report a problem with this skill