Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

correlate-observability-signals

Unify metrics, logs, and traces for cohesive debugging. Implement exemplars for log-to-trace linking, build unified dashboards using RED/USE methods, and enable rapid root cause analysis across observability signals. Use when investigating complex incidents spanning multiple systems, reducing mean time to resolution, implementing distributed tracing, or moving from siloed tools to a unified observability platform.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md12.5 KB
  • references/EXAMPLES.md8.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Correlate Observability Signals

Connect metrics, logs, and traces for unified debugging across the three pillars of observability.

When to Use

  • Investigating complex incidents that span multiple systems
  • Reducing MTTR (mean time to resolution)
  • Building unified observability dashboards
  • Implementing distributed tracing
  • Moving from siloed tools to unified observability

Inputs

  • Required: Prometheus (metrics)
  • Required: Log aggregation system (Loki, Elasticsearch, CloudWatch)
  • Required: Distributed tracing backend (Tempo, Jaeger, Zipkin)
  • Optional: Grafana for unified visualization
  • Optional: OpenTelemetry instrumentation

Procedure

See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.

Step 1: Implement Trace Context Propagation

Add trace IDs to all logs and metrics using OpenTelemetry:

// Go example: Propagate trace context to logs
package main

import (
    "context"
    "log"

    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"
)

func handleRequest(ctx context.Context, userID string) {
    // Extract trace context
    span := trace.SpanFromContext(ctx)
    traceID := span.SpanContext().TraceID().String()

    // Include trace ID in structured logs
    log.Printf("trace_id=%s user_id=%s action=process_request", traceID, userID)

    // Business logic here
    processData(ctx, userID)
}

func processData(ctx context.Context, userID string) {
    tracer := otel.Tracer("my-service")
    ctx, span := tracer.Start(ctx, "processData")
    defer span.End()

    traceID := span.SpanContext().TraceID().String()
    log.Printf("trace_id=%s user_id=%s action=process_data", traceID, userID)

    // More work
}

Python example:

# Python: Flask with OpenTelemetry
from flask import Flask, request
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.instrumentation.flask import FlaskInstrumentor
import logging

app = Flask(__name__)
FlaskInstrumentor().instrument_app(app)

logging.basicConfig(
    format='%(asctime)s trace_id=%(otelTraceID)s span_id=%(otelSpanID)s %(message)s',
    level=logging.INFO
)

@app.route('/api/users/<user_id>')
def get_user(user_id):
    span = trace.get_current_span()
    trace_id = format(span.get_span_context().trace_id, '032x')

    logging.info(f"Fetching user {user_id}", extra={
        'otelTraceID': trace_id,
        'otelSpanID': format(span.get_span_context().span_id, '016x')
    })

    # Business logic
    return {"user_id": user_id}

Expected: All logs include trace_id field, enabling log-to-trace correlation.

On failure: If trace IDs missing, check OpenTelemetry SDK initialization and context propagation.

Step 2: Configure Exemplars in Prometheus

Exemplars link metrics to traces:

# prometheus.yml
global:
  scrape_interval: 15s
  # Enable exemplar storage
  exemplars:
    max_exemplars: 100000  # Per TSDB block

scrape_configs:
  - job_name: 'api-service'
    static_configs:
      - targets: ['api-service:8080']
    # Scrape exemplars
    metric_relabel_configs:
      - source_labels: [__name__]
        regex: 'http_request_duration_seconds.*'
        action: keep

Instrument application to emit exemplars:

// Go: Emit exemplars with Prometheus histogram
package main

import (
    "github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus"
    "github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promauto"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"
)

var httpDuration = promauto.NewHistogramVec(
    prometheus.HistogramOpts{
        Name:    "http_request_duration_seconds",
        Help:    "HTTP request duration",
        Buckets: prometheus.DefBuckets,
    },
    []string{"method", "endpoint", "status"},
)

func recordRequest(ctx context.Context, method, endpoint, status string, duration float64) {
    // Get trace ID for exemplar
    span := trace.SpanFromContext(ctx)
    traceID := span.SpanContext().TraceID().String()

    // Record metric with exemplar
    observer := httpDuration.WithLabelValues(method, endpoint, status)
    observer.(prometheus.ExemplarObserver).ObserveWithExemplar(
        duration,
        prometheus.Labels{"trace_id": traceID},
    )
}

Query exemplars in Prometheus:

# Histogram with exemplars
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))

In Grafana, exemplars appear as dots on histogram graphs that link to traces.

Expected: Grafana shows exemplars in metric graphs, clicking opens corresponding trace.

On failure: Verify Prometheus version ≥2.26 (exemplar support), check Grafana data source config enables exemplars.

Step 3: Build Unified Dashboard with RED Method

RED Method: Rate, Errors, Duration (for services)

{
  "dashboard": {
    "title": "API Service - RED Dashboard",
    "panels": [
      {
        "title": "Request Rate (req/s)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "sum(rate(http_requests_total{job=\"api-service\"}[5m])) by (endpoint)",
            "legendFormat": "{{ endpoint }}"
          }
        ],
        "exemplars": true
      },
      {
        "title": "Error Rate (%)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "sum(rate(http_requests_total{job=\"api-service\", status=~\"5..\"}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total{job=\"api-service\"}[5m])) * 100",
            "legendFormat": "Error %"
          }
        ],
        "exemplars": true
      },
      {
        "title": "Request Duration (p50, p95, p99)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "histogram_quantile(0.50, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job=\"api-service\"}[5m]))",
            "legendFormat": "p50"
          },
          {
            "expr": "histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job=\"api-service\"}[5m]))",
            "legendFormat": "p95"
          },
          {
            "expr": "histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job=\"api-service\"}[5m]))",
            "legendFormat": "p99"
          }
        ],
        "exemplars": true
      },
      {
        "title": "Correlated Logs",
        "type": "logs",
        "datasource": "Loki",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "{job=\"api-service\"} |= \"error\""
          }
        ],
        "options": {
          "showTime": true,
          "enableLogDetails": true
        }
      }
    ]
  }
}

Expected: Single dashboard showing rate, errors, duration + correlated logs.

On failure: If panels show "No Data", verify metric names match your instrumentation.

Step 4: Implement USE Method for Resources

USE Method: Utilization, Saturation, Errors (for resources like CPU, memory, disk)

{
  "dashboard": {
    "title": "Node Resources - USE Dashboard",
    "panels": [
      {
        "title": "CPU Utilization (%)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "100 - (avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode=\"idle\"}[5m])) * 100)",
            "legendFormat": "CPU Usage %"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "CPU Saturation (Load Average)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "node_load1",
            "legendFormat": "1min load"
          },
          {
            "expr": "node_load5",
            "legendFormat": "5min load"
          },
          {
            "expr": "count(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode=\"idle\"})",
            "legendFormat": "CPU cores (threshold)"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Memory Utilization (%)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) / node_memory_MemTotal_bytes * 100",
            "legendFormat": "Memory Usage %"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Memory Saturation (Page Faults)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "rate(node_vmstat_pgmajfault[5m])",
            "legendFormat": "Major page faults/s"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Disk Utilization (%)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes) / node_filesystem_size_bytes * 100",
            "legendFormat": "{{ device }}"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Disk Saturation (IO Wait %)",
        "type": "graph",
        "targets": [
          {
            "expr": "rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode=\"iowait\"}[5m]) * 100",
            "legendFormat": "IO Wait %"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}

Expected: Dashboard showing resource health across all USE dimensions.

On failure: Ensure node_exporter is running and scraping system metrics.

Step 5: Link Logs to Traces in Loki

Configure Loki to extract trace IDs:

# loki-config.yml
schema_config:
  configs:
    - from: 2024-01-01
      store: boltdb-shipper
      object_store: s3
      schema: v11
      index:
        prefix: index_
        period: 24h

# Derived fields for trace linking
query_config:
  derived_fields:
    - name: TraceID
      source: trace_id
      url: 'https://tempo.company.com/trace/${__value.raw}'
      urlDisplayLabel: 'View Trace'

In Grafana, configure Loki data source:

{
  "name": "Loki",
  "type": "loki",
  "url": "http://loki:3100",
  "jsonData": {
    "derivedFields": [
      {
        "datasourceUid": "tempo-uid",
        "matcherRegex": "trace_id=(\\w+)",
        "name": "TraceID",
        "url": "$${__value.raw}"
      }
    ]
  }
}

Expected: Clicking trace ID in Loki logs opens corresponding trace in Tempo.

On failure: Verify regex matches your log format, check Tempo data source UID.

Step 6: Create Unified Incident View

Build a dashboard that brings all signals together:

{
  "dashboard": {
    "title": "Incident Investigation",
    "templating": {
      "list": [
        {
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Workflow during incident:

  1. Alert fires for high error rate
  2. On-call engineer opens Grafana dashboard
  3. Identifies spike in error rate at specific time
  4. Clicks exemplar dot on duration histogram → opens trace
  5. Trace shows slow database query
  6. Clicks "View Logs" on span → opens logs for that trace
  7. Logs reveal specific SQL query causing timeout
  8. Root cause identified in <2 minutes

Expected: Single pane of glass for debugging, jumping between metrics/logs/traces.

On failure: If links don't work, check data source configurations and trace ID propagation.

Validation

  • Trace IDs present in all application logs
  • Prometheus scraping exemplars
  • Grafana dashboards show exemplar dots on histograms
  • Clicking exemplar opens corresponding trace in Tempo/Jaeger
  • Loki logs have "View Trace" links that work
  • RED dashboard created for key services
  • USE dashboard created for infrastructure
  • Unified incident dashboard tested during GameDay

Common Pitfalls

  • Inconsistent trace ID format: OpenTelemetry uses 32-char hex, Jaeger uses 16-char. Choose one.
  • Missing context propagation: If trace IDs don't flow across services, distributed tracing breaks. Use OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation.
  • Exemplar overload: Too many exemplars (>100k) can slow Prometheus. Sample high-volume metrics.
  • Clock skew: Traces span multiple services. Ensure NTP is configured; clock drift causes trace ordering issues.
  • Data retention mismatch: If traces expire before metrics, correlation breaks. Align retention policies.

Related Skills

  • setup-prometheus-monitoring - metrics foundation for correlation
  • configure-log-aggregation - logs foundation for correlation
  • instrument-distributed-tracing - traces foundation for correlation
  • build-grafana-dashboards - unified visualization layer

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Execute structural metamorphosis using strangler fig migration, chrysalis phases, and interface preservation. Covers transformation planning, parallel running, progressive cutover, rollback design, and post-metamorphosis stabilization for system architecture evolution. Use when assess-form has classified the system as READY for transformation, when migrating from monolith to microservices, when replacing a core subsystem while dependents continue operating, or when any architectural change must be gradual rather than big-bang.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pjt222/agent-almanac42Updated Oct 23, 2026

Master skill composing the 5-step synoptic cycle for panoramic synthesis across multiple domains. Orchestrates meditate, expand-awareness, observe, awareness, integrate-gestalt, and express-insight into a coherent process that produces unified understanding rather than sequential compromise. Use when a problem genuinely spans 3+ domains and the interactions between domains matter more than depth in any one, when sequential analysis feels like compromise rather than integration, or before major architectural decisions affecting multiple stakeholders.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pjt222/agent-almanac42Updated Oct 23, 2026

Scaffold a new puzzle type across all 10+ pipeline integration points in jigsawR. Creates the core puzzle module, wires it into the unified pipeline (generation, positioning, rendering, adjacency), adds ggpuzzle geom/stat layers, updates DESCRIPTION and config.yml, extends the Shiny app, and creates a comprehensive test suite. Use when adding a completely new puzzle type to the package or following the 10-point integration checklist to ensure nothing is missed end-to-end.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pjt222/agent-almanac42Updated Oct 23, 2026

Add Rcpp or RcppArmadillo integration to an R package for high-performance C++ code. Covers setup, writing C++ functions, RcppExports generation, testing compiled code, and debugging. Use when an R function is too slow and profiling confirms a bottleneck, when you need to interface with existing C/C++ libraries, or when implementing algorithms (loops, recursion, linear algebra) that benefit from compiled code.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pjt222/agent-almanac42Updated Oct 23, 2026

aikido

Free

Practice aikido as a defensive martial art emphasizing harmony, redirection, and controlled resolution. Covers centering and grounding, ukemi (safe falling and rolling), core techniques (irimi-nage, shiho-nage, kote-gaeshi, ikkyo), blending and tai sabaki (body movement), randori (multiple attacker practice), weapons awareness, and applying principles off the mat. Use when learning a defensive martial art that prioritizes de-escalation, developing the ability to redirect aggression without causing unnecessary harm, building safe falling skills, or cultivating calm centeredness under physical pressure.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pjt222/agent-almanac42Updated Oct 23, 2026

Analyze an arbitrary codebase to identify functions, APIs, and data sources suitable for exposure as MCP tools, producing a tool specification document. Use when planning an MCP server for an existing project, auditing a codebase before wrapping it as an AI-accessible tool surface, comparing what a codebase can do versus what is already exposed via MCP, or generating a tool spec to hand off to scaffold-mcp-server.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

pjt222/agent-almanac42Updated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by pjt222

Report a problem with this skill