Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

github-review-iteration

Coordinate GitHub pull request reviews by assigning comment triage and code changes to dedicated sub-agents. Repeat the process, track decisions and progress, and reply to and resolve threads as fixes are completed.

OriginalShow the original description

Orchestrates a GitHub PR review loop by delegating triage and implementation to dedicated sub-agents, then repeating until actionable review items are cleared. Use when the user says “address PR review”, “triage review comments”, or “iterate until review is clean”.

Works withGitHub
See how to install

Good for

  • Work through outstanding pull request review comments
  • Separate required fixes from items outside the pull request scope
  • Repeat review and implementation until actionable items are cleared

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB
  • agents/review-orchestrator.md2.6 KB
  • package.json275 B
  • scripts/review-iterate.mjs4.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

GitHub Review Iteration

Run an iterative PR review loop: fetch state → render/summarize → triage actions → implement (code + Done + resolve) → re-fetch until the PR has no remaining actionable items.

This skill is an orchestrator. It delegates:

  • triage to ../review-triage-phase/agents/review-triager.md
  • implementation to ../review-implement-phase/agents/review-implementer.md

The orchestrator owns sequencing, handoff, and loop control. It does not perform triage or implementation directly when delegation is available.

Locating sibling skills and scripts

This skill depends on three sibling skills that live in the same parent directory:

  • ../review-fetch-phase/ — fetches and renders PR review state
  • ../review-triage-phase/ — triages review threads into an action plan
  • ../review-implement-phase/ — implements triaged actions and resolves threads

All script paths in this document are relative to this skill's directory. Use ../ to reach sibling skills. Do not search the workspace/repo for these files — they are part of the skills installation, not the project being reviewed.

Run the scripts from the repository root, addressing them by their full path under the skills installation. The reviews root defaults to wip/reviews resolved against the working directory, so a run started elsewhere writes artifacts outside the repo-root wip/ tree that .gitignore covers. Pass --reviews-root <repo-root>/wip/reviews if you must run from another directory.

To run a path from the repository root, prefix it with this skill's installed location — .agents/skills/github-review-iteration/. So ../review-fetch-phase/scripts/fetch-review-state.mjs becomes .agents/skills/review-fetch-phase/scripts/fetch-review-state.mjs.

Usage

This skill supports subcommands:

  • triage: fetch + triage into structured actions
  • implement: execute the triaged actions and update status
  • iterate: loop triage → implement until clear (default)
/github-review-iteration iterate <PR_URL> [output-dir]

When output-dir is omitted, use the standard layout: wip/reviews/<owner>_<repo>_pr-<number>/ (derived from the PR URL, with owner and repo lowercased — derive a directory name by hand the same way, or the artifacts split across two directories).

Example:

/github-review-iteration iterate https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/pull/123

Files written (deterministic layout)

Store artifacts under:

wip/reviews/<owner>_<repo>_pr-<number>/

Canonical artifacts:

  • review-state.json (canonical v2)
  • review-actions.json (canonical v2)

Derived artifacts:

  • review-state.md
  • summary.txt (or JSON summary)
  • review-actions.md
  • apply-log.json (optional)

When you need a thin wrapper for path setup + standard script calls, run:

node .agents/skills/github-review-iteration/scripts/review-iterate.mjs --pr <PR_URL>

For phase-specific execution without full orchestration, use:

  • /review-fetch-phase <PR_URL> [output-dir]
  • /review-triage-phase <PR_URL> [output-dir]
  • /review-implement-phase <PR_URL> [output-dir]

Behavioral rules

  • WILL ADDRESS items:
    • reply + 👍
    • leave unresolved until fixed
  • Not addressed in this PR items:
    • reply with rationale + 👎
    • resolve the thread
  • Implementation:
    • granular, intent-driven commits
    • explicit staging only (never git add -A / git add .)
    • reply “Done” and resolve when complete

Operational reliability notes (Cursor)

gh api TLS / cert failures in sandboxed shells

If GitHub administration fails with an error like:

  • x509: OSStatus -26276 (or similar TLS/certificate verification failures)

Treat it as an environment/sandbox cert-store mismatch, not a script bug.

Recovery:

  • Re-run the affected gh calls outside the sandbox (use a shell mode that uses the system cert store).
  • Do not disable TLS verification (no GH_NO_VERIFY_SSL, no custom curl flags).
  • After re-running, continue the loop normally (fetch → triage → implement → resolve → repeat).

JSON-first deterministic commands

All script paths below are relative to this skill's directory.

  1. Fetch canonical JSON:
node ../review-fetch-phase/scripts/fetch-review-state.mjs --pr <PR_URL> --out-json <review-dir>/review-state.json
  1. Render and summarize from JSON (pure scripts):
node ../review-fetch-phase/scripts/render-review-state.mjs --in <review-dir>/review-state.json --out <review-dir>/review-state.md
node ../review-fetch-phase/scripts/summarize-review-state.mjs --in <review-dir>/review-state.json --format text --out <review-dir>/summary.txt
  1. Render triage plan from canonical actions JSON:
node ../review-triage-phase/scripts/render-review-actions.mjs --in <review-dir>/review-actions.json --out <review-dir>/review-actions.md

Data exchange format (triager → implementer)

review-actions.json is the contract between the triager and implementer.

Minimum v2 shape:

{
  "version": 2,
  "pr": { "url": "https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/pull/123", "nodeId": "PR_kw..." },
  "reviewState": { "path": "review-state.json", "fetchedAt": "...", "version": 2 },
  "actions": [
    {
      "actionId": "A-001",
      "target": { "kind": "review_thread", "nodeId": "PRRT_xxx", "url": "..." },
      "decision": "will_address",
      "summary": "One-line description of what will be done",
      "rationale": null,
      "targetFiles": ["path/to/file.ts"],
      "acceptance": "How to tell it's done",
      "status": "pending",
      "done": null
    }
  ]
}

Rules:

  • Use node ids only for targets (target.nodeId).
  • Preserve actions[] order intentionally (do not reorder).
  • Implementer updates status (pending|in_progress|done) and done records in place.
  • Compound targets: A single pull_request_review body may contain multiple findings (especially from automated reviewers like CodeRabbit which bundle "outside diff range" comments into the review body). The triager must decompose these into sub-actions (e.g., A02a, A02b). Never blanket-dismiss review bodies without reading their content.

Procedure

triage

  1. Delegate to triage sub-agent

Invoke the review triager agent at ../review-triage-phase/agents/review-triager.md and pass:

  • PR URL
  • output paths:
    • <output-dir>/review-state.md
    • <output-dir>/review-state.json
    • <output-dir>/review-actions.md
    • <output-dir>/review-actions.json
  • optional scope constraints
  1. Require triage outputs

The triager must:

  • fetch review state (via ../review-fetch-phase/scripts/fetch-review-state.mjs)
  • triage review threads into review-actions.json decisions/status
  • write/update review-actions.md and review-actions.json
  1. Validate handoff contract

Before returning from triage, verify that <output-dir>/review-actions.json exists and is valid for implementer consumption (version, PR metadata, and actions[] with target.kind + target.nodeId).

implement

  1. Delegate to implementation sub-agent

Invoke the review implementer agent at ../review-implement-phase/agents/review-implementer.md and pass:

  • PR URL
  • <output-dir>/review-actions.md
  • <output-dir>/review-actions.json
  • optional scope constraints
  1. Require implementation outputs

The implementer must:

  • work through pending will_address actions
  • make focused, explicit-staging commits
  • run smallest relevant checks per action
  • reply "On it" when starting, then "Done" and resolve the thread when complete
  • update review-actions.json in-place (status, done)
  • re-fetch review state at the end to verify remaining actionable items

Responsibility note:

  • Posting "Done" and resolving completed threads belongs to the implementer phase and is part of marking actions done.

iterate

Repeat delegated triage → delegated implement until there are no remaining actionable review items.

Loop contract:

  1. Run triage delegation and read resulting review-actions.json.
  2. Inspect review-actions.json; if no will_address actions remain with pending or in_progress status, stop and report completion.
  3. Run implement delegation.
  4. Re-run triage delegation to refresh state and determine next iteration.
  5. Continue until clear.

Optional shortcuts (repo-specific)

If this repo provides dedicated slash commands or subagents for triage/implementation, prefer them to reduce manual steps.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

adr-review

FreeSummary

Review and rewrite architecture decision records, documents that explain design choices, from a newcomer’s perspective. Identify missing context, buried decisions, and temporary details, then reorganize each document so future readers can follow the reasoning.

  • Reviewing design decisions from a new team member’s perspective
  • Making an ADR’s decision and reasoning easier to follow
  • Removing temporary project context from long-lived records
prisma/orm47.7KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Refactor TypeScript code that handles several variants in multiple places using frozen classes and a Visitor interface, which defines a handler for each variant. This helps type checking expose missing handlers when new variants are added.

  • Refactor a union type with repeated switch statements
  • Design commands or nodes that need several kinds of processing
  • Catch missing handlers when adding a new variant
prisma/orm47.7KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

bumping-biome

FreeSummary

Update Biome packages with pnpm, align configuration filenames and schema versions across the repository, and run the configured checks and fixes. Receive a report of remaining issues, with optional further fixes subject to agreement.

  • Updating Biome to a specified version
  • Aligning configuration files after dependency updates
  • Checking for issues introduced by a Biome update
prisma/orm47.7KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

contrib-pr

FreeSummary

Prepare and open a pull request for an external contribution to prisma/orm. Check contribution rules, change scope, tests, and contributor signoffs, then draft the title and explanation for approval before submitting from a fork.

  • Submitting a Prisma contribution from a fork
  • Checking tests and scope before requesting review
  • Verifying contributor signoffs on every commit
prisma/orm47.7KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

create-pr

FreeSummary

Create GitHub pull requests for Prisma 8 with Linear ticket IDs in their titles. Turn branch changes into a clear description covering concrete examples, design decisions, behavior changes, and testing evidence for reviewers.

  • Submitting branch changes for review
  • Linking a pull request to a Linear ticket
  • Explaining design decisions and behavior changes
prisma/orm47.7KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Draft Prisma 8 release notes from merged PRs since the previous published release. Select user-facing changes, put breaking changes first, link migration guidance and PR evidence, and mirror the notes in CHANGELOG.md.

  • Draft notes for a stable or RC release
  • Summarize changes since the previous published release
  • Explain breaking changes with migration guidance
prisma/orm47.7KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by prisma

Report a problem with this skill