Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

runbook

Write an operational runbook. Use when the user says "write a runbook", "on-call documentation", "how to operate this service", "alert runbook", "troubleshooting guide for ops", "what to do when this alert fires", "operational procedures", or needs to document how to run, troubleshoot, or respond to a service - even if they don't explicitly say "runbook".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withKubernetes
See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Overview

Based on the Google SRE Book. A runbook is the operational contract for a service: how to start it, stop it, diagnose it, and recover it. Google SRE's standard: a runbook should be executable by an on-call engineer who has never seen the service before. If it requires tribal knowledge, it's not a runbook - it's an assumption.

The test: can an on-call engineer follow this runbook at 3am with a degraded service, no time to research, and adrenaline affecting their cognition? If not, it's not operational-grade.

Workflow

Step 1: Write the service overview

Service: [your service]
Owner team: [your team]
On-call rotation: [who gets paged]
SLO: [availability target, e.g. 99.9% uptime]
Dependencies: [upstream services this depends on]
Dependents: [downstream services that depend on this]
Dashboards: [links]
Logs: [how to access]
Alerts: [link to alerting config]

Step 2: Document steady-state operations

What does normal look like?

Health check:

# Command to verify the service is healthy
curl https://[your service]/health
# Expected response: {"status": "ok", "version": "x.y.z"}

Key metrics (normal ranges):

MetricNormalWarningCritical
Error rate< 0.1%0.1-1%> 1%
p99 latency< 200ms200-500ms> 500ms
CPU usage< 60%60-80%> 80%

Step 3: Document alert runbooks

For each alert, write a response procedure:

Alert: [Alert name]
Severity: [SEV1/SEV2/SEV3]
Fires when: [condition]
Impact: [what users experience]

Diagnosis:
  1. Check [dashboard link] for [specific signal]
  2. Run: [command] - Expected: [output]
  3. Check: [logs location] for [error pattern]

Common causes:
  A. [Cause] - Fix: [command or action]
  B. [Cause] - Fix: [command or action]

If none of the above: escalate to [team/person]

Step 4: Document common operations

List every routine operational task with exact commands:

Restart the service:

kubectl rollout restart deployment/[service-name] -n [namespace]
kubectl rollout status deployment/[service-name] -n [namespace]

Scale up:

kubectl scale deployment/[service-name] --replicas=[n] -n [namespace]

Rollback a deploy:

kubectl rollout undo deployment/[service-name] -n [namespace]
# Verify rollback succeeded:
kubectl rollout status deployment/[service-name] -n [namespace]

Step 5: Document recovery procedures

For each failure mode, step-by-step recovery:

Failure: [service is unresponsive / returning 5xx / high latency]
Verify: [how to confirm this is the problem]
Recover:
  1. [first action]
  2. [second action]
  3. [verify recovery: command - expected output]
Escalate if: [condition that means this runbook is insufficient]

Step 6: Document escalation paths

Who to call when the runbook doesn't work:

SituationContactHow
Database issue[DB team][PagerDuty / Slack]
Network issue[Infra team][contact]
Vendor outage[Vendor support][ticket URL]

Step 7: Add a testing section

How does an on-call engineer practice with this runbook in a non-emergency?

  • Chaos engineering scenarios
  • Runbook review frequency (recommend: quarterly)
  • Last tested: [date]

Anti-Patterns

1. Runbook that requires tribal knowledge Bad: "Check if the DB is having issues." (how? where? what to look for?) Good: "Run psql -h [host] -U [user] -c 'SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity' - if > 100 connections, connection pool exhaustion is likely."

2. Commands without expected output Bad: "Run the health check command." Good: "Run: curl https://[your service]/health - Expected: {"status":"ok"}. If you see {"status":"degraded"}, proceed to Step 3."

3. No escalation path Bad: Runbook ends with "investigate further." Good: Every runbook has an explicit "escalate if" condition and names who to escalate to.

4. Runbook never tested Bad: Runbook written once, never validated in a real incident. Good: Run quarterly fire drills. Note the last tested date in the runbook.

Quality Checklist

  • Service overview complete (owner, SLO, dependencies, links)
  • Normal operating metrics defined with ranges
  • Every alert has a response procedure with exact commands
  • Commands include expected outputs (not just what to run)
  • Common operations documented step-by-step
  • Recovery procedures cover the top 3 failure modes
  • Escalation path named and reachable
  • Last tested date recorded
  • Executable at 3am by someone unfamiliar with the service

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

qa-aman/claude-skills21Updated Oct 19, 2026

Generate A/B copy variants grounded in Eugene Schwartz's awareness and market-sophistication stages and John Caples' tested-headline discipline. Every variant declares its angle, the awareness stage it targets, and a falsifiable hypothesis, and the skill recommends which pair to test first and what delta counts as signal. Use when the user says "A/B test this", "write variants", "give me options", "test different angles", "copy variants", "ab copy", "test this headline", "multiple versions", "which version is better", or wants to test copy before publishing. For reviewing copy that already exists, see copy-review. For sample size and stopping rules, see growth-experiment. For diagnosing a page rather than its words, see page-cro. For full paid ad sets by platform, see ad-campaign-writer.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

qa-aman/claude-skills21Updated Oct 19, 2026

Design statistically rigorous experiments to test data science hypotheses. Use when the user says "design an A/B test", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "is this difference significant", "how many samples do I need", "randomized controlled trial", "causal inference", "uplift test", "holdout group", "significance test", "power calculation", "avoid p-hacking", or needs to determine whether an observed effect is real before making a product or model decision. For lean build-measure-learn product experiments without the statistics, use experiment-design instead.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

qa-aman/claude-skills21Updated Oct 19, 2026

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

qa-aman/claude-skills21Updated Oct 19, 2026

Build a strategic account plan for winning, retaining, or expanding a named account. Use when the user says "build an account plan", "strategic account planning", "how do I grow this account", "account expansion strategy", "whitespace analysis", "QBR prep", "key account review", "map the stakeholders in this account", "land and expand plan", "how do I break into [company]", or wants a structured strategy for a specific account.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

qa-aman/claude-skills21Updated Oct 19, 2026

Write paid ad copy for LinkedIn, Google, Meta, and YouTube. Produces multiple variants per platform, each targeting a different Eugene Schwartz awareness level and Cialdini persuasion principle. Use when the user asks for ad copy, ad variants, "write LinkedIn ads", Google ads, Meta ads, paid social copy, ad headlines, or wants creative for a paid campaign. Reads brand voice, ICP, and positioning from knowledge/. For organic social posts, see linkedin-post or social-calendar. For the landing page the ad points at, see landing-page-writer. For testing variants, see ab-copy-writer.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

qa-aman/claude-skills21Updated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by qa-aman

Report a problem with this skill