Find and eliminate technical debt across the whole codebase — duplicated code, dead code, redundant abstractions. Use at the end of a coding session or when the codebase feels bloated. Reports findings and fixes them with user confirmation. Cleanups limited to the current working changes belong in a native simplify flow instead.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Scan the codebase for technical debt and eliminate it. Run at end of session or when the codebase feels bloated.
/techdebt — full scan + report, confirm before fixing/techdebt fix — scan and fix without confirmationPROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$PROJECT_ROOT"
Look for:
Use Grep and Glob to identify candidates. Confirm each item is truly dead/duplicated before reporting.
## Tech Debt Found
### Duplicated Code
- `src/utils/formatDate.ts:12` and `src/helpers/dates.ts:45` — identical logic
Fix: consolidate into formatDate.ts, delete dates.ts
### Dead Code
- `src/api/legacyAuth.ts` — no imports found anywhere
Fix: delete file
### Stale TODOs
- `src/components/Modal.tsx:89` — TODO from 6 months ago, feature shipped
Fix: remove comment
For each item, ask the user to confirm unless they said "fix". After fixes:
# Run tests to verify nothing broke
npm test 2>&1 | tail -20
GATE: Tests still pass after cleanup.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Act as a Senior Accessibility Engineer to audit a page, component, or design against WCAG 2.2 AA. Produces a triaged finding list (critical/serious/moderate), focus-order map, contrast report, ARIA decision tree, and a screen-reader test plan. Use when shipping new UI, hardening an existing flow, or preparing for VPAT/accessibility conformance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment — "split test," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," or comparing two versions. For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking. For page-level conversion optimization, see page-cro.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, full variations — for any paid platform; 'ad copy variations,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'creative testing,' 'write me some ads.' For campaign strategy and targeting, see paid-ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
When the user wants content cited by LLMs or surfaced in AI-generated answers — 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude,' 'AI citations,' 'zero-click search.' For traditional technical/on-page audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement — "GA4," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "tracking plan," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or how to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-test-setup.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Architectural decision advisor for cloud, data, and SaaS distributed systems. Use when the user asks "should we use X or Y", weighs a tradeoff, or needs a decision matrix, scaling analysis, cost-at-scale review, data-tier design, multi-tenancy model, or API/resilience guidance. For full technical blueprints, use enterprise-design.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.