Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

agent-harness-fault-injection

Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Agent Harness Fault Injection

Overview

Use a deterministic, non-production fault schedule to test whether an agent workflow preserves state, budgets, safety boundaries, and evidence when a dependency fails. The output is a small fault matrix, an event timeline, and a verdict that distinguishes recovered, contained, unrecoverable, and inconclusive runs.

When to Use This Skill

  • Use when a multi-step agent, state machine, loop, or multi-agent workflow has a new recovery path.
  • Use when sandbox execution, an MCP/tool call, a worker, a checkpoint store, or memory can time out or disappear.
  • Use before claiming retry, resume, deadline, isolation, or partial-failure behavior is production-ready.
  • Use when a regression needs reproducible failure evidence instead of a random chaos run.

Do not use this skill against a production target, real user data, live credentials, or an unbounded external service. Convert those cases to a local simulator or an authorized staging harness first.

Safety and Boundary Preconditions

  1. Freeze the workflow revision, model/prompt configuration, tool schemas, seed, input fixture, timeout, retry budget, deadline, and expected terminal states.
  2. Run in a disposable sandbox with synthetic inputs and stubbed tools. Keep network disabled unless the test explicitly needs a local test server.
  3. Make every injected failure an in-memory or fixture-controlled event. Never delete real data, revoke real credentials, kill an unrelated process, or mutate a live service to create a failure.
  4. Record the test scope and a run identifier before starting. A missing scope, fixture, or recovery contract makes the verdict inconclusive.

Recovery Contract

Write the invariant before injecting a fault. A useful contract names the state that must survive and the side effects that must not repeat:

After recovery, resume from the latest durable checkpoint, preserve the task
identity and safety policy, spend no more than the remaining retry/deadline
budget, and commit each externally visible effect at most once.

Model the workflow with explicit states. For example:

created -> running -> checkpointed -> waiting_for_tool
                       |                |
                       v                v
                    failed <--------- recovering -> resumed -> completed

For each transition, define the owner, durable fields, allowed retry count, and terminal behavior. In-memory values are not checkpoints unless the harness proves they survive the simulated restart.

Fault Matrix

Select the smallest set of faults that covers the new recovery logic. Do not randomize the schedule until a deterministic schedule has passed.

FaultInjection boundaryRequired observationExpected containment
sandbox denialbefore a tool startsno unsafe side effect; reason is retainedretry only when policy allows
MCP/tool timeoutafter request id is assignedtimeout is attributed to that requestbounded retry with same idempotency key
worker restartafter checkpoint writeworker reloads the same task versionresume from latest checkpoint
missing/stale checkpointbefore resumestale data is rejected or markedstop safely; never invent progress
parallel branch failureone branch after fan-outsibling status is preservedjoin policy decides retry, degrade, or stop
memory lossclear ephemeral contextdurable facts are reconstructedask or stop when required facts are absent
retry/deadline exhaustionon the final attemptno extra call is scheduledterminal failed or timed_out

Deterministic Injection Schedule

Use event numbers rather than wall-clock randomness. A schedule should be portable across harnesses:

{
  "seed": "harness-fixture-07",
  "faults": [
    {"event": "tool.call", "ordinal": 2, "kind": "timeout", "tool": "search"},
    {"event": "worker.start", "ordinal": 2, "kind": "restart"},
    {"event": "branch.join", "ordinal": 1, "kind": "partial_failure", "branch": "summarize"}
  ]
}

The harness should emit the schedule, not merely the seed. Keep fault identity separate from the observed error so a wrapper cannot accidentally turn a timeout into a generic failure. Run the same schedule twice and compare the normalized timeline before trying a different schedule.

Recovery Rules by Boundary

Sandbox and MCP/tool failures

  • Assign a request id and idempotency key before the call.
  • Distinguish timeout, explicit tool error, invalid output, and policy denial.
  • Retry only the declared retryable classes; preserve the original error and attempt count in the evidence.
  • Do not retry a side effect unless the tool contract says the key is safe to replay. A read timeout is not proof that a write did not happen.
  • When the deadline or retry budget is exhausted, emit one terminal event and stop scheduling work.

Worker restart an

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 23, 2026

Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 23, 2026

Usar al iniciar o mejorar un proyecto de IA: diagnostica código y restricciones, propone skills existentes y redacta tareas y un plan de implementación en español.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 23, 2026

Usar para crear o mejorar una skill de Andru.ia: define entradas y resultados, redacta SKILL.md con ejemplos y límites, valida la estructura y prepara una PR.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 23, 2026

Usar tras definir el sector de un proyecto: prepara un dossier en español con contexto, normas aplicables, patrones UX y riesgos, distinguiendo fuentes verificadas de hipótesis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 23, 2026

AI-powered presentation generation via the 2slides API — create slides from text, match a reference image style, summarize documents into decks, add AI voice narration, and export pages/audio. Use f

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by ranbot-ai

Report a problem with this skill