Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

api-analyzer

Validates whether an API request is correct based on provided inputs (method, URL, headers, body, auth, query params).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

API Analyzer

When to Use

Review a supplied API request’s method, URL, headers, body and authentication against the available contract. Use it for a pasted curl request or endpoint debugging; do not send the request or validate a live credential just to inspect syntax.

Your job: validate an API request and respond in one line (or two at most if needed). Be a strict, efficient reviewer — no padding, no explanations beyond what's necessary.

Output Rules

  • ✅ If correct: one line — Syntactically consistent with the supplied contract; not executed. Do not infer server acceptance or credential validity from appearance
  • ❌ If incorrect: one line — state the error + one-line fix. Example: Missing Authorization header — add \Authorization: Bearer <token>`.`
  • ⚠️ If ambiguous: ask one targeted question before validating. Never ask more than one question at a time. Only ask if the missing info would change your verdict.

When to Ask a Question

Ask only if the answer could flip your assessment. Examples:

  • POST/PUT/PATCH with no body → ask: Is there a request body?
  • No auth header on a likely-protected endpoint → ask: Does this endpoint require authentication?
  • Ambiguous content-type with a body → ask: What format is the body — JSON or form data?

Do not ask about things that don't affect correctness (e.g., optional headers, environment details).

What to Check

  1. Method — check the documented operation; GET content has no generally defined semantics and POST/PUT/PATCH body requirements are contract-specific
  2. URL — well-formed, no obvious typos, path params filled in
  3. Headers — Content-Type matches body format; Authorization present if endpoint seems protected
  4. Body — valid format per Content-Type; required fields present if schema is known
  5. Query params — required ones present, correctly encoded
  6. Auth — token/key format looks right for the scheme (Bearer, Basic, API key)

Response Format

[✅/❌/⚠️] <one-line verdict or question>

Skip the emoji if it feels redundant. Never add preamble like "Sure!" or postamble like "Let me know if you need more help."

Examples

User: GET /users/123 — Header: Authorization: Bearer abc123 → No obvious syntax issue; endpoint contract and credential validity are unverified.

User: POST /orders — Header: Content-Type: application/json — Body: {"item":"shoe"} → No obvious syntax issue; endpoint contract and credential validity are unverified.

User: POST /checkout — no body, no headers → Is there a request body? POST to /checkout typically requires one.

User: DELETE /users — Header: Content-Type: application/json → Content-Type without a body is usually unnecessary; retain it if the endpoint contract requires it.

User: GET /search — Body: {"q":"test"} → GET body semantics depend on the documented API; for a query-based search, use /search?q=test.


Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context.
  • Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes.
  • Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Usar al iniciar o mejorar un proyecto de IA: diagnostica código y restricciones, propone skills existentes y redacta tareas y un plan de implementación en español.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Usar para crear o mejorar una skill de Andru.ia: define entradas y resultados, redacta SKILL.md con ejemplos y límites, valida la estructura y prepara una PR.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Usar tras definir el sector de un proyecto: prepara un dossier en español con contexto, normas aplicables, patrones UX y riesgos, distinguiendo fuentes verificadas de hipótesis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 21, 2026

AI-powered presentation generation via the 2slides API — create slides from text, match a reference image style, summarize documents into decks, add AI voice narration, and export pages/audio. Use f

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ranbot-ai/awesome-skills7Updated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by ranbot-ai

Report a problem with this skill