Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

omh-support-operations

Turn a customer support case into a reply draft, an assessment of severity and impact, and a recommended escalation path. The skill also identifies missing evidence and prepares next steps with ownership for an internal handover.

OriginalShow the original description

[omh] Support ticket your team must answer or escalate: turn a support case into a clear customer reply, severity path, and owned next step. Use when the user says: support escalation, customer support reply, ticket triage, 고객 지원 에스컬레이션, 고객 답변 초안, 지원 티켓 분류.

See how to install

Good for

  • Drafting a reply to a customer affected by a login outage
  • Assessing whether a case needs engineering escalation
  • Clarifying ownership and missing evidence for a support handover

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Support Operations

This is a Hermes-native support-operations workflow skill.

Why This Exists

support-operations turns a bounded customer case into response and escalation guidance without treating drafts or recommendations as helpdesk actions.

Do Not Use When

  • The request clusters a backlog of customer signals to find product patterns or roadmap candidates; use omh-feedback-triage.
  • The user only needs a generic, non-support marketing or email rewrite with no case, severity, or escalation context; use omh-content-operator.
  • The request asks to send a reply, change ticket priority or status, issue a refund, modify an account, or update a helpdesk; use omh-apps with an explicit target and observed result.
  • The request is an incident that is still open, needing severity declared, a commander assigned, and a running timeline rather than a support-case response; use omh-live-incident-response.
  • The request is a closed incident's postmortem or reliability evidence rather than a support-case response; use omh-reliability-review.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: Draft a calm reply for this login-outage customer and tell me whether it needs an engineering escalation.
  • Expected behavior: Prepare a customer-safe reply, severity matrix, engineering escalation recommendation, and owner handoff.
  • Why: The request is one support case with reply and escalation decisions, not a feedback backlog or ticket mutation.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: Cluster last quarter's support feedback into roadmap opportunities.
  • Expected behavior: Route to feedback-triage, not support-operations.
  • Why: A historical signal backlog needs product-pattern triage rather than case-level support guidance.

Completion Checklist

  • The source boundary, signal clusters, severity, and follow-up lane are named.
  • Bug, feature, research, strategy, and coding handoff outcomes stay separate.
  • The next workflow is recommended before any implementation claim.

Recovery Notes

  • If feedback lacks source or severity, ask for the missing signal before coding handoff.
  • If the item is actually a plan or research request, route to that workflow instead of triage.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Research and company ops (product-docs, source-finder, web-research, research, model-optimization, inference-serving, model-finetuning, research-brief, +26 more) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when one or a bounded set of support contacts needs response drafting, urgency classification, incident/escalation routing, and follow-up ownership.

Strong routing signals: `support escalation`, `customer support reply`, `ticket triage`, `고객 지원 에스컬레이션`, `고객 답변 초안`, `지원 티켓 분류`

Catalog Metadata

Category: triage Phase: support-operations Hermes role: operator Quality tier: triage-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • State issue, severity, impact, evidence gaps, owner, and next route.
  • Draft a reply without treating it as a sent customer communication.

Handoff policy:

Keep domain framing, clarification, source/evidence synthesis, draft outputs, and next-work routing in Hermes. A prepared brief, review, reply, or plan is not an external action, approval, filing, send, publish, data mutation, implementation, review, CI, or merge claim. Prepare a connector, file, coding, or human-review handoff only when the user explicitly accepts that next step; report it only from observed evidence. Reply text is a draft, escalation is a recommendation, and no ticket state, message send, refund, account action, or customer outcome is claimed.

Required inputs:

  • support case
  • known facts
  • customer impact
  • available ownership or escalation path

Expert clarification questions:

  • support case
    • English: Which support case should we examine first?
    • Korean: 어떤 지원 사례를 먼저 살펴봐야 하나요?

Expected outputs:

  • customer-safe reply draft with stated facts, unknowns, and tone
  • issue/severity/impact/escalation matrix
  • internal next-step and owner handoff brief
  • missing repro, account, entitlement, or approval evidence list

Artifact expectations:

  • prepared support case brief when a wrapper captures it

Artifact contracts:

This label denotes the machine-enforcement level, not a skill quality score and not an observed evidence state.

  • contract_id: support-operations; enforcement_level: guidance_only; consumer_id: none

Safety rules:

  • Keep customer-safe facts, unknowns, and escalation recommendations distinct.
  • Do not claim ticket mutation, message send, refund, account action, or case outcome.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: ops-review.

omh runtime record --skill support-operations --harness ops-review --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a real unresolved user decision or a useful briefing discussion remains, offer one specific, content-linked question. Completed work needs no question; omit unrelated non-action footers and generic offers to continue.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

dag-ulw

FreeSummary

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

model-onboarding

FreeSummary

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

omh-achievements

FreeSummary

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

omh-agent-board

FreeSummary

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by rlaope

Report a problem with this skill