Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

omh-toolbelt-readiness

Identify the MCP servers, command-line tools, API credentials, and connectors a workflow needs before work starts. The skill lists what is present, missing, optional, or unsafe and identifies the next setup or verification step.

OriginalShow the original description

[omh] Which tools and credentials a workflow needs: inventory which MCP servers, CLIs, APIs, credentials, and connectors a workflow needs; use external-connector-readiness to assess one named integration. Use when the user says: toolbelt-readiness, mcp readiness, tool readiness, plugin readiness, connector readiness, needed mcp, api credential, missing cli.

Works withGmail

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Listing tools needed for a planned workflow
  • Preparing weekly Linear and GitHub triage
  • Checking missing CLIs and API credentials
  • Separating required and optional integrations

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Toolbelt Readiness

This is an OMH toolbelt-readiness workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

Why This Exists

toolbelt-readiness exists so the tools, CLIs, credentials, and connectors a workflow needs are listed as present, missing, optional, or unsafe before the work starts, instead of failing midway on a tool nobody checked.

Do Not Use When

  • One named integration needs assessing end to end before adoption; use omh-external-connector-readiness.
  • The question is which coding owner should run the work.
  • The user wants a tool installed, a credential validated, or a connector called now; the card names that step and who runs it, and performs none of them.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: toolbelt-readiness what MCP or CLI tools do I need for weekly Linear and GitHub triage?
  • Expected behavior: Produce prepare_toolbelt_readiness with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
  • Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: toolbelt-readiness claim Gmail access works without an observed credential check.
  • Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
  • Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.

Completion Checklist

  • Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.
  • Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.
  • Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.

Recovery Notes

  • If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.
  • If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.

When to Use

Use when a workflow depends on MCP, CLI, API credentials, or connectors and Hermes must show installed, missing, optional, and unsafe tools.

Strong routing signals: `toolbelt-readiness`, `mcp readiness`, `tool readiness`, `plugin readiness`, `connector readiness`, `needed mcp`, `api credential`, `missing cli`, `missing plugin`, `missing connector`, `external connector`, `external tool`, `mcp server`, `mcp servers`, `mcp tool`, `mcp tools`, `toolbelt`, `github cli`, `linear cli`, `jira cli`, `notion connector`, `google drive connector`, `gmail connector`, `slack api`, `browser tool`, `image generator connector`, `mcp`, `credential`, `외부 도구`, `외부 연결`, `커넥터`, `플러그인`, `자격증명`

Catalog Metadata

Category: tools Phase: readiness-check Quality tier: workflow-surface-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

  • Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
  • Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
  • Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
  • On Hermes, count a native tool as present when it is in your tool list or tool_search finds it: a tool deferred behind tool_search is reached through tool_call and is never listed as missing, and a Hermes version number never decides presence. Present is not authorized or working.

Required inputs:

  • user request
  • target context
  • delivery or status expectation
  • known missing evidence

Expected outputs:

  • toolbelt-readiness/v1 card or guidance
  • next action
  • prepared-vs-observed boundary

Artifact expectations:

  • toolbelt-readiness/v1 metadata-only runtime or wrapper card when recorded

Safety rules:

  • A toolbelt readiness card is not MCP server installation, credential validation, API access, connector invocation, or successful workflow execution evidence.
  • Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.

Runtime Evidence

Use the current host's own tools and subagent/task mechanism when available; otherwise run the same lanes sequentially or name the unavailable capability. A prepared plan, handoff, checklist, or skill installation is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence. Record actual tool results, or not_observed / not_available, in the record; never invent dispatch or host accounting. Treat supplied context as advisory, not proof of hidden memory reads or writes. State scope, constraints, verification, and the stop condition before work. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: the host's persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a real unresolved user decision or a useful briefing discussion remains, offer one specific, content-linked question. Completed work needs no question; omit unrelated non-action footers and generic offers to continue. Supporting paths are relative to this skill directory; sibling skill paths are relative to its parent. Resolve them from the host-provided skill base directory ({baseDir} on hosts that provide it), never a hardcoded install location. A named workflow not installed here is unavailable, not permission to emulate its host-specific capabilities. Verify through the real surface before done.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

dag-ulw

FreeSummary

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.8KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

model-onboarding

FreeSummary

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.8KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.8KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

omh-achievements

FreeSummary

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.8KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.8KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

omh-agent-board

FreeSummary

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.8KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by rlaope

Report a problem with this skill