Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

omh-workspace-audit

Inspect an agent workspace to inventory skills, prompts, plugins, tools, and configuration. Produce a prioritized gap and risk assessment based on observed evidence, with recommendations for the next workflow, while keeping files and settings unchanged.

OriginalShow the original description

[omh] Workspace setup inventory and gaps: map repository, skill, prompt, plugin, MCP, hook, config, and runtime surfaces before strengthening or operating OMH. Use when the user says: workspace-audit, workspace audit, repo surface audit, repository surface audit, workspace surface audit, repo inventory, surface inventory, skill inventory.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Taking inventory of skills and prompts
  • Checking plugin, MCP, and hook configuration
  • Prioritizing missing, duplicate, or outdated capabilities
  • Reviewing configuration risks before planning improvements

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Workspace Audit

This is a Hermes-native workspace-audit workflow skill.

Why This Exists

workspace-audit gives OMH an ECC-inspired but OMH-native front door for understanding a large agent workspace before strengthening it, without turning inventory into hidden mutation or runtime proof.

Do Not Use When

  • The user already named a concrete implementation task with files and acceptance criteria; use the coding handoff or delivery workflow.
  • The request is local OMH installation health only; use omh-doctor.
  • The request is a source acquisition or current web lookup; use omh-source-finder or ulw-research.

Examples

Good example:

  • Prompt: workspace-audit OMH에 스킬/프롬프트/플러그인 표면이 어디 비어있는지 먼저 점검해줘.
  • Expected behavior: Prepare workspace_audit_plan/v1, observed surface_inventory/v1, gap matrix, redacted config findings, and downstream workflow recommendation.
  • Why: The user asks for repo/workspace capability strengthening based on observed local surfaces.

Bad example:

  • Prompt: workspace-audit 발견한 config 파일을 바로 고치고 secret 값도 출력해줘.
  • Expected behavior: Refuse secret disclosure, keep the audit read-only, and prepare a separate remediation handoff if needed.
  • Why: Workspace audit is inventory and risk mapping, not unsafe config mutation or secret extraction.

Completion Checklist

  • Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.
  • Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.
  • Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.

Recovery Notes

  • If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.
  • If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.

Workflow Lane

  • Current lane: Automation and status (achievements, workspace-audit, production-audit, live-incident-response, automation-blueprint, github-event-ops, github-issue-intake, buzz, +40 more) - schedules, status, health, and ops review.
  • If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
  • Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md').

When to Use

Use when Hermes should inspect the local repo/workspace/operator surface and produce a safe inventory, risk map, and gap list before planning, routing, or feature strengthening.

Strong routing signals: `workspace-audit`, `workspace audit`, `repo surface audit`, `repository surface audit`, `workspace surface audit`, `repo inventory`, `surface inventory`, `skill inventory`, `prompt inventory`, `plugin inventory`, `mcp inventory`, `hook inventory`, `config audit`, `what are we missing`, `audit this repo`, `레포 감사`, `워크스페이스 감사`, `설정 감사`, `스킬 인벤토리`

Catalog Metadata

Category: operations Phase: workspace-audit Hermes role: operator Quality tier: workspace-audit-gated Reasoning demand: light

Quality bar:

  • Name the audit scope, root, exclusions, and downstream decision before inspecting.
  • Separate discovered surfaces, inferred relationships, missing evidence, risks, and candidate fixes.
  • Rank gaps by user impact, operational risk, and reviewability rather than by file count.
  • Route code changes, setup repair, security fixes, or skill updates into later explicit workflows.

Handoff policy:

Keep the audit as Hermes-retained local evidence gathering. Prepare executor handoff only for later code changes, and record file reads, tool availability, config checks, and runtime observations only when observed.

Required inputs:

  • workspace or repo root
  • audit scope: repo, skills, prompts, plugins, MCP/tools, hooks, config, docs, runtime artifacts
  • known constraints such as no secrets, no network, or read-only mode
  • desired downstream decision or strengthening goal

Expected outputs:

  • workspace_audit_plan/v1
  • surface_inventory/v1
  • capability_gap_matrix/v1
  • config_security_findings/v1
  • downstream_workflow_recommendation/v1
  • not-evidence boundary

Artifact expectations:

  • workspace_audit_plan/v1 with target root, scopes, exclusions, and read-only boundary
  • surface_inventory/v1 with repo, skill, prompt, plugin, MCP/tool, hook, config, docs, and runtime surfaces when observed
  • capability_gap_matrix/v1 with missing, duplicate, stale, risky, and high-leverage strengthening candidates
  • redacted config_security_findings/v1 when secrets, permissions, or external integrations are mentioned

Safety rules:

  • Do not mutate repo files, installed skills, prompts, configs, plugins, MCP servers, hooks, secrets, or runtime state from the audit lane.
  • Never print secret values; record only redacted key names, file paths, and risk categories.
  • Do not claim a surface exists, is loaded, or is reachable unless file, CLI, wrapper, or supplied evidence was observed.
  • Keep audit findings separate from implementation, setup repair, security remediation, or skill mutation.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: workspace-audit.

omh runtime record --skill workspace-audit --harness workspace-audit --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

  • Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion. Reply in the user's own words and the host's own voice: its SOUL.md persona owns reply language, tone, speech level, and sentence endings, progress updates included (where it sets no language, use the one the user wrote in), and OMH shapes structure and content only; OMH's record terms (surface, lane, wrapper, handoff, evidence boundary, not_observed) stay in records and tool calls, never in the sentence the user reads unless they ask about one; and when a real unresolved user decision or a useful briefing discussion remains, offer one specific, content-linked question. Completed work needs no question; omit unrelated non-action footers and generic offers to continue.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: skill_view(name='omh-routing', file_path='references/skill-common-rail.md'). Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

dag-ulw

FreeSummary

Coordinate a large job by splitting it into small tasks with explicit dependencies. Run ready tasks in parallel through Hermes, verify the combined result separately, and repair failures within defined limits before reporting completed work and remaining gaps.

  • Delivering a feature across multiple modules
  • Coordinating a migration with ordered steps
  • Managing a broad cleanup across separate work areas
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

model-onboarding

FreeSummary

Guide the addition of a new model generation to oh-my-hermes. The workflow checks model recognition, official specifications, routing rules that select models for tasks, documented pricing, and live access, then validates changes with tests and comparative benchmarks.

  • Add a new model generation to oh-my-hermes
  • Check API model IDs and dated snapshot recognition
  • Update model selection chains and related documentation
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare an accessibility audit for an interface using WCAG 2.2 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize evidence for keyboard use, screen readers, contrast, target size, and zoom behavior, then document findings, missing checks, and remediation handoffs.

  • Reviewing checkout accessibility against WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Checking keyboard access and focus order
  • Organizing screen-reader labels and announcement evidence
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

omh-achievements

FreeSummary

Summarize earned badges, recent unlocks, achievement tiers, and progress using local files from the hermes-achievements plugin. Prepare a badge list or report section while making missing information and the limits of the recorded snapshot clear.

  • Checking earned badges
  • Reviewing recently unlocked achievements
  • Finding progress toward the next achievement tier
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Examine a technical proposal through independent perspectives, challenge their findings, and resolve objections. The result is a structured set of constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions for a separate planning workflow.

  • Reviewing a technical proposal before planning
  • Challenging assumptions behind a migration
  • Organizing risks and unresolved questions
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

omh-agent-board

FreeSummary

Coordinate multiple Hermes agents or profiles through a shared task board. Organize assignments, handoffs, activity updates, blockers, and completion states, while distinguishing planned actions from work supported by observed results.

  • Coordinate agent roles for a launch checklist
  • Track task handoffs and blockers
  • Prepare work for pickup across profiles or after a restart
rlaope/oh-my-hermes3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by rlaope

Report a problem with this skill