Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

prd-architect

Updated to cover both pre-code PRD/ERD/Docs generation AND post-code continuous documentation updates / Diperbarui untuk mencakup pembuatan PRD/ERD/Docs pra-kode DAN pembaruan dokumentasi kontinu pasca-kode.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withPostgreSQL
See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md14.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

PRD Architect & Documentation Lifecycle (2026 Edition)

English | Bahasa Indonesia


<a name="english"></a>

English

Orchestration & Integration

Connects with anti-slop, brainstorming, zero-to-prod-orchestrator, session-memory-manager to ensure cohesive execution and zero-slop documentation updates.

Description

A mandatory lifecycle guardrail covering two distinct phases:

  • Phase 1 (Pre-Code): Enforces creating a comprehensive Product Requirements Document (PRD), ERD, and general Documentation before generating code. Introduces PRD-as-Code — machine-readable and version-controlled.
  • Phase 2 (Post-Code / Maintenance): Automatically maintains project documentation after every successful build or feature implementation, updating CHANGELOG.md, BLUEPRINT.md, PROGRESS.md, and Architecture Decision Records (ADRs).

Trigger Conditions

  • Phase 1: User requests building a new app/SaaS/feature from scratch; no existing PRD/blueprint; unclear scope.
  • Phase 2: A feature, bug fix, or refactor is successfully implemented; user asks to "update docs" or "save progress"; a significant architectural decision is made; milestone completion.

Phase 1: Pre-Code Requirements & Enforcement

Why PRD Before Code: Prevents scope creep, aligns AI output, enables traceability, reduces rework, version-controlled.

Enforcement Protocol

  1. Detect: When user requests a new project build.
  2. Pause: Do NOT generate any code.
  3. Generate Assets (Zero-Slop Standard): Automatically draft PRD.md, ERD.md, DOKUMENTASI.md, and ROADMAP.md (or PROGRESS.md). Enforce anti-slop: zero marketing buzzwords; mandate concrete PostgreSQL DDL schemas, explicit REST/RPC contracts, and verified latency NFR budgets.
  4. Review: Present to user for approval/edits.
  5. Confirm: Proceed to code generation ONLY after approval.
  6. Reference: Cite these documents in all subsequent decisions.

PRD-as-Code Template (12 Sections)

# Product Requirements Document (PRD)
**Project**: [Project Name]
**Version**: 1.0.0
**Status**: Draft | In Review | Approved
**Created**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Last Updated**: YYYY-MM-DD

---
## 1. Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: What is this product? Who is it for? What problem does it solve?]

## 2. Problem Statement
**Problem**: [Clear description]
**Target Users**: [Specific segments]
**Current Pain Points**: [List]

## 3. Goals & Success Metrics
| Goal | Metric | Target |
|---|---|---|
| [Goal] | [Metric] | [Target] |

## 4. User Personas
### Persona 1: [Name]
- **Role**: [Job title]
- **Goals**: [What they want to achieve]
- **Frustrations**: [What currently doesn't work]
- **Key Behaviors**: [How they'll use this product]

## 5. Feature Requirements
### MVP Features (Must Have — v1.0)
- [ ] **[Feature Name]**: [Description. Acceptance criteria: ...]
### Phase 2 Features (Should Have — v1.x)
- [ ] **[Feature Name]**: [Description]
### Future Features (Nice to Have — v2.0+)
- [ ] **[Feature Name]**: [Description]

## 6. Technical Architecture
### Stack Decision
| Layer | Technology | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| [Layer] | [Technology] | [Reason] |
### Architecture Decisions (ADRs)
- **ADR-001**: [Decision title] — [Decision made and why]
### Multi-Entry Points (if SaaS)
| Entry Point | Domain | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| [Entry] | [Domain] | [Purpose] |

## 7. Data Model (High-Level)
users ──belongs_to──> workspaces (via workspace_members)
workspaces ──has_many──> projects

## 8. User Flows
### Primary Flow: [Name]
1. User [action 1]
2. System [response 1]

## 9. Non-Functional Requirements
| Requirement | Target |
|---|---|
| Performance | LCP < 2.5s, INP < 200ms |

## 10. Out of Scope
- [Explicitly excluded item]

## 11. Open Questions
- [ ] [Question that needs decision]

## 12. Approval & Sign-off
| Stakeholder | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| [Name] | [Role] | [Status] |

Phase 2: Post-Code Maintenance & Update Protocol

After every successful feature implementation:

  1. CHANGELOG.md: Add entry under [Unreleased] (Keep-a-Changelog standard: Added/Changed/Fixed/Removed/Security).
  2. BLUEPRINT.md: Update only if architecture, schema, stack, or entry points changed.
  3. PROGRESS.md: Mark completed tasks [x], update next steps.
  4. ADR: Create a new ADR (docs/adr/ADR-NNN-title.md) if a significant architectural decision was made and update index (docs/adr/README.md).

Files Maintained Frequency Matrix

FilePurposeUpdate Frequency
CHANGELOG.mdUser-facing list of changesEvery PR / feature
BLUEPRINT.mdTechnical architecture overviewMajor structural changes
PROGRESS.mdDevelopment roadmap and statusEach work session
docs/adr/Architecture Decision RecordsEach key decision

ADR Template

# ADR-001: [Title]
**Status**: Accepted | Rejected | Proposed | Deprecated
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Deciders**: [Team/Individual]
## Context
[What motivated this decision?]
## Decision
[What is being decided?]
## Rationale
[Why this choice?]
## Consequences
**Positive:** / **Negative:**
## Superseded By
[ADR-XXX] (if applicable)

🎨 Automatic Visual Assets Generation Mandate (CRITICAL)

MANDATORY: When building a new application, use generate_image to create a custom logo. Use it as:

  1. The primary application logo (header/navbar).
  2. The website favicon (favicon.ico).
  3. The Open Graph (OG) image for SEO (og:image).

<a name="bahasa-indonesia"></a>

Bahasa Indonesia

Integrasi Orkestrasi

Terhubung dengan brainstorming, zero-to-prod-orchestrator, session-memory-manager, spec-driven-development-expert, dan anti-slop.

Deskripsi

Guardrail siklus hidup wajib untuk rekayasa perangkat lunak modern:

  • Fase 1 (Pra-Kode / Pre-Code): Memaksa perancangan dokumen spesifikasi (PRD, ERD, Dokumentasi, Roadmap) sebelum sebaris kode pun ditulis. Mencegah pemborosan token dan refaktorisasi berulang.
  • Fase 2 (Pasca-Kode / Post-Code): Memelihara dokumentasi hidup secara berkelanjutan setelah setiap fitur selesai: CHANGELOG.md, BLUEPRINT.md, PROGRESS.md, dan Architecture Decision Records (docs/adr/).

Kondisi Pemicu (Trigger Conditions)

  • Fase 1 (Wajib Aktif):
    • Permintaan proyek baru dari nol ("buatkan aplikasi...", "bikin SaaS...").
    • Tidak ada berkas PRD di direktori akar repositori.
    • Ruang lingkup kebutuhan atau model data belum terdefinisi secara eksplisit.
  • Fase 2 (Pemeliharaan Kontinu):
    • Suatu fitur atau modul berhasil diimplementasikan dan diverifikasi lolos tes.
    • Pengguna meminta "perbarui dokumentasi" atau "catat perubahan ini".
    • Keputusan arsitektur besar diambil (migrasi DB, perubahan auth, adopsi library inti).

Mengapa PRD Sebelum Kode (Why PRD Before Code)

  1. Mencegah Scope Creep: Membatasi batas fungsional sebelum implementasi.
  2. Penyelarasan Konteks AI: Memberikan grounding akurat bagi seluruh subagen swarm.
  3. Traceability Penuh: Setiap endpoint API dan tabel DB memiliki justifikasi kebutuhan pengguna.
  4. Zero-Slop Standard: Mengeliminasi buzzword pemasaran dan memastikan skema DDL PostgreSQL, kontrak JSON REST/RPC, serta target latensi NFR terukur secara matematis.

Fase 1: Protokol Penegakan 6 Langkah

  1. Deteksi (Detect): Kenali instruksi pembuatan proyek baru dari pengguna.
  2. Jeda (Pause): JANGAN membuat atau mengedit berkas kode program apa pun.
  3. Hasilkan Berkas Spesifikasi (Zero-Slop): Secara otomatis susun draf PRD.md, ERD.md, DOKUMENTASI.md, dan PROGRESS.md.
  4. Tinjau (Review): Sajikan draf kepada pengguna untuk validasi dan penyesuaian parameter bisnis.
  5. Konfirmasi (Confirm): Mulai penulisan kode sumber HANYA setelah pengguna memberikan persetujuan ("Proceed", "Lanjut", atau perbaikan disetujui).
  6. Jadikan Referensi (Reference): Rujuk dokumen PRD ini dalam setiap keputusan arsitektur dan penulisan tes TDD.

Template PRD-as-Code Standar (12 Bagian Lengkap)

# Product Requirements Document (PRD)
**Project**: [Nama Proyek / Aplikasi]
**Versi**: 1.0.0
**Status**: Draft | In Review | Approved
**Dibuat**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Terakhir Diperbarui**: YYYY-MM-DD

---
## 1. Ringkasan Eksekutif (Executive Summary)
[2-3 kalimat lugas: Apa produk ini? Siapa target audiensnya? Masalah spesifik apa yang diselesaikan?]

## 2. Pernyataan Masalah (Problem Statement)
- **Masalah Utama**: [Deskripsi konkret pain point di dunia nyata]
- **Target Pengguna**: [Segmen persona spesifik]
- **Kelemahan Solusi Saat Ini**: [Daftar inefisiensi atau risiko dari cara lama]

## 3. Sasaran & Metrik Keberhasilan (Goals & Success Metrics)
| Sasaran Bisnis / Teknis | Metrik Evaluasi | Target Kuantitatif |
|---|---|---|
| Kecepatan Transaksi | Latensi p95 Checkout | < 250ms |
| Adopsi Pengguna | Monthly Active Users | 5,000 pengguna di Q1 |
| Kestabilan Sistem | Error Rate API | < 0.05% |

## 4. Persona Pengguna (User Personas)
### Persona 1: [Nama Karakteristik]
- **Peran**: [Jabatan / Peran Pengguna, misal: Finance Manager]
- **Tujuan Utama**: [Apa hasil yang ingin mereka capai secepat mungkin]
- **Frustrasi Terbesar**: [Halangan yang paling sering mereka hadapi]
- **Pola Interaksi**: [Bagaimana & kapan mereka membuka aplikasi ini]

## 5. Kebutuhan Fitur (Feature Requirements - MoSCoW)
### Fitur MVP (Must Have — v1.0)
- [ ] **[Nama Fitur 1]**: [Deskripsi fungsional. Kriteria Penerimaan: Given-When-Then]
- [ ] **[Nama Fitur 2]**: [Deskripsi fungsional. Kriteria Penerimaan: Given-When-Then]
### Fitur Tahap Lanjutan (Should Have — v1.x)
- [ ] **[Nama Fitur 3]**: [Deskripsi fungsional yang meningkatkan efisiensi]
### Fitur Masa Depan (Nice to Have — v2.0+)
- [ ] **[Nama Fitur 4]**: [Eksperimen fitur AI atau otomasi tambahan]

## 6. Arsitektur Teknis (Technical Architecture)
### Pilihan Teknologi (Stack Decision)
| Lapisan (Layer) | Teknologi Terpilih | Alasan & Justifikasi Teknis |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend | Next.js 15 App Router + React 19 | Server Component streaming, caching terintegrasi |
| Styling | Tailwind CSS v4 | CSS-first configuration, performa kompilasi instan |
| Backend API | Node.js 24 LTS + Hono / Express 5 | Latensi ultra-rendah, typing TypeScript end-to-end |
| Database | PostgreSQL 16 + Drizzle ORM | ACID compliance, type-safety, migrasi deterministik |

### Multi-Entry Points (Jika Arsitektur SaaS)
| Entry Point | Subdomain / Path | Tujuan & Peruntukan |
|---|---|---|
| Web Publik | `example.com` | Landing page pemasaran & pendaftaran publik |
| Dashboard Tenant | `app.example.com` | Panel kerja terautentikasi pengguna |
| API Gateway | `api.example.com` | Endpoint integrasi pihak ketiga & webhook |

## 7. Model Data & Hubungan Entitas (High-Level ERD)

users ──1:N──> workspace_members <──N:1── workspaces workspaces ──1:N──> projects ──1:N──> tasks


## 8. Alur Pengguna Utama (Core User Flows)
### Alur 1: Pendaftaran Organisasi & Pembayaran Langganan
1. Pengguna membuka halaman registrasi dan memasukkan kredensial email/password.
2. Sistem membuat baris baru di tabel `users` dan mengirim tautan verifikasi.
3. Pengguna memilih paket langganan dan diarahkan ke gateway pembayaran DOKU / Stripe.
4. Webhook pembayaran menerima status sukses → akun diaktivasi secara atomik.

## 9. Kebutuhan Non-Fungsional (Non-Functional Requirements - NFR)
| Kategori | Parameter | Target Kepatuhan |
|---|---|---|
| Performa Web | Core Web Vitals | LCP < 2.0s, INP < 150ms, CLS < 0.05 |
| Keamanan | Autentikasi | Hashing Argon2id, CSRF token, CSP Level 3 |
| Ketersediaan | SLA Uptime | 99.9% Uptime bulanan |
| Aksesibilitas | Standar A11y | WCAG 2.2 Level AA penuh, kontras rasio >= 4.5:1 |

## 10. Batasan Ruang Lingkup (Out of Scope)
- [Daftar hal yang secara eksplisit TIDAK dikerjakan pada versi v1.0]

## 11. Pertanyaan Terbuka & Keputusan Tertunda (Open Questions)
- [ ] [Poin teknis atau regulasi yang masih memerlukan konfirmasi pihak eksternal]

## 12. Persetujuan & Tanda Tangan (Approval & Sign-off)
| Pemangku Kepentingan | Peran / Divisi | Status Persetujuan | Tanggal |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Nama Pemimpin Proyek] | Product Owner | Approved | YYYY-MM-DD |
| [Nama Lead Engineer] | Tech Lead | Approved | YYYY-MM-DD |

Fase 2: Protokol Pemeliharaan & Pembaruan Pasca-Kode

Setelah setiap kali penyelesaian fitur atau perbaikan kode penting:

  1. CHANGELOG.md: Tambahkan catatan versi pada bagian [Unreleased] mengikuti konvensi Keep a Changelog (Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security).
  2. BLUEPRINT.md: Perbarui diagram atau pemetaan arsitektur HANYA jika terdapat perubahan skema database, dependensi inti, atau struktur rute.
  3. PROGRESS.md: Centang kotak tugas yang selesai ([x]) dan perbarui prioritas kerja berikutnya.
  4. ADR (Architecture Decision Records): Terbitkan dokumen baru docs/adr/ADR-NNN-judul.md bila terjadi pemilihan arsitektur strategis, serta sinkronkan indeks pada docs/adr/README.md.

Matriks Frekuensi Pembaruan Berkas

Berkas DokumentasiPeruntukan UtamaFrekuensi Pembaruan
CHANGELOG.mdRiwayat perubahan yang dapat dibaca manusiaSetiap kali pull request atau fitur selesai
BLUEPRINT.mdIkhtisar teknis arsitektur sistemPerubahan struktural besar
PROGRESS.mdPelacak status pengerjaan & checklist tugasSetiap sesi kerja pengembangan
docs/adr/Catatan keputusan arsitektur kunciSetiap keputusan teknologi permanen

Template Standar ADR (Architecture Decision Record)

# ADR-001: [Judul Keputusan Arsitektur]
**Status**: Diterima (Accepted) | Ditolak (Rejected) | Diusulkan (Proposed) | Kedaluwarsa (Deprecated)
**Tanggal**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Pengambil Keputusan**: [Tim / Arsitek Perangkat Lunak]

## Konteks (Context)
[Apa masalah atau tantangan arsitektur yang mendasari perlunya keputusan ini?]

## Keputusan (Decision)
[Teknologi, pola, atau pendekatan arsitektur spesifik apa yang diputuskan untuk diadopsi?]

## Alasan & Dasar Pertimbangan (Rationale)
[Mengapa opsi ini dipilih dibandingkan dengan alternatif lain yang tersedia?]

## Konsekuensi (Consequences)
- **Dampak Positif:** [Keuntungan performa, keterbacaan kode, efisiensi biaya, atau keamanan]
- **Dampak Negatif & Risiko:** [Trade-off komputasi, kompleksitas operasional, atau kurva belajar]

## Digantikan Oleh (Superseded By)
[ADR-XXX] (jika di kemudian hari keputusan ini direvisi oleh ADR yang lebih baru)

🎨 Mandat Pembuatan Aset Visual Otomatis (KRITIS)

WAJIB: Saat menginisialisasi aplikasi web baru dari awal, agen HARUS menggunakan tool generate_image untuk menghasilkan logo merek visual profesional. Aset ini wajib ditempatkan sebagai:

  1. Logo utama aplikasi di komponen header/navbar.
  2. Ikon tab browser atau favicon resmi (favicon.ico atau icon.png).
  3. Banner kartu media sosial Open Graph untuk SEO (og:image).

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Expert guide for automated and manual Web Accessibility (a11y) testing — axe-core, Pa11y, Playwright a11y, screen reader testing, and WCAG 2.2 Level AA/AAA compliance / Panduan ahli pengujian aksesibilitas web.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug105Updated Oct 20, 2026

Expert guide for intelligent model cascading and routing — complexity-scored task routing from Flash/Haiku to Sonnet/Opus/Astra, dynamic escalation with quality gates, 40-60% token cost reduction while maintaining output quality / Panduan ahli untuk kaskade dan routing model cerdas — routing tugas berbasis skor kompleksitas dari Flash/Haiku ke Sonnet/Opus/Astra, eskalasi dinamis dengan gerbang kualitas, pengurangan biaya token 40-60% dengan kualitas output terjaga.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug105Updated Oct 20, 2026

Expert guide for Affective Computing, emotional AI, and real-time sentiment analysis through native multimodal tokens (voice intonation and facial micro-expressions) / Panduan ahli komputasi afektif, AI emosional, dan analisis sentimen real-time melalui token multimodal native.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug105Updated Oct 20, 2026

Expert guide for AI-assisted coding workflows — agentic code generation, multi-agent code swarms, self-healing CI/CD, automated PR review, spec-to-code pipelines, codebase knowledge graphs, and human-in-the-loop approval gates / Panduan ahli untuk workflow pengkodean berbasis AI — generasi kode agentic, code swarm multi-agen, CI/CD self-healing, review PR otomatis, pipeline spec-to-code, knowledge graph codebase, dan gate persetujuan human-in-the-loop.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug105Updated Oct 20, 2026

Expert guide for autonomous Machine-to-Machine (M2M) agent settlement, dual-rail fiat & stablecoin micro-clearing, dynamic budget envelopes, and cryptographic agent invoicing / Panduan ahli settlement otonom antar-agen (M2M), kliring mikro dual-rail fiat & stablecoin, pagu anggaran dinamis, dan penagihan agen kriptografis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug105Updated Oct 20, 2026

Expert guide for long-term episodic memory integration (Mem0 v2, Letta/MemGPT, Zep v2), memory tier architecture, pgvector HNSW storage, and unified context management for autonomous AI agents / Panduan ahli untuk integrasi memori episodik jangka panjang (Mem0 v2, Letta/MemGPT, Zep v2), arsitektur tier memori, penyimpanan pgvector HNSW, dan manajemen konteks terpadu untuk agen AI otonom.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug105Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by roedyrustam

Report a problem with this skill