ase-arch-analyze
FreeReview software architecture, including package cohesion and inter-package coupling
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Distill a provided document into a flat, importance-ranked list of its key points, each with a salience rank, a rationale, and a verbatim line-cited evidence snippet. Use when the user wants to "distill", "summarize the key points", or "extract the essence" of a document or pasted text.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
@${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-control.md @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-skill.md @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-getopt.md
<purpose name="ase-docs-distill"> Distill Key Points </purpose><expand name="getopt" arg1="ase-docs-distill" arg2="--top|-t=5"> $ARGUMENTS </expand>
<objective> *Distill* the content `<getopt-arguments/>` into a *flat*, *importance-ranked* list of its *key points* - each point an *atomic* claim carrying a *0-10 salience rank*, a *one-line rationale*, and a *verbatim, line-cited evidence* snippet - keeping at most `<getopt-option-top/>` points. </objective>Resolve the document source from <getopt-arguments/> using probe-as-file-first semantics:
Only output the following <template/> and then STOP immediately:
<template> ⧉ **ASE**: ✪ skill: **ase-docs-distill**, ▶ status: **no document to distill** </template> </if>Treat the entire <getopt-arguments/> as a file path. If it resolves to a readable file, read that file and capture its content together with its line numbers into <source/>, and set <origin/> to the file path.
Treat <getopt-arguments/> verbatim as pasted text, capture it
into <source/> numbering its lines from 1, and set <origin/>
to empty (so locations are cited as :Ls-Le).
Only output the following <template/> and then STOP immediately:
<template> ⧉ **ASE**: ✪ skill: **ase-docs-distill**, ▶ status: **no document to distill** </template> </if>You MUST NOT output anything else in this STEP 1.
</step>Read <source/> and distill it into its key points.
Extract the document's key points, where each point is one atomic, self-contained claim, decision, or fact - not a section-level summary that blends several claims.
For each point, determine:
A <rank/> on a 0-10 salience scale reflecting its importance-to-the-reader (impact, centrality, consequence)
A one-line <rationale/> that justifies why the point earns that <rank/>.
A <location/> citing the exact source line range as
<origin/>:Ls-Le (for a file) or :Ls-Le (for pasted text),
where Ls is the start line and Le is the end line.
A verbatim <evidence/> snippet, copied exactly from <source/> (but with all newlines replaced with spaces and multiple spaces collapsed into a single space), that proves the point. The cited snippet MUST prove the point verbatim. If it does not, re-investigate and re-cite correctly.
Sort the points by <rank/> from highest to lowest. Within the same rank, keep the order of first appearance in <source/>.
Apply the top-bound <getopt-option-top/> as an upper bound
only: keep at most min(<getopt-option-top/>, number of salient points) points and never pad the list with filler to reach
the bound. If <getopt-option-top/> is non-numeric or less
than or equal to 0, use the default 5 instead.
You MUST NOT output anything in this STEP 2.
</step>For each distilled point, emit the following <template/>, where <rank/> is its salience rank, <point/> is the atomic claim, <location/> is its line-range citation, <evidence/> is the verbatim proving snippet, and <rationale/> is the one-line salience justification:
<template><ase-tpl-bullet-normal/> KEY POINT: <point/>
◯ LOCATION: <location/>
◯ EVIDENCE: "<evidence/>"
◯ RATIONALE: <rationale/>
◯ RANK: <rank/>/10
In the <location/>, mark up the line-range reference as
code (with backticks) and prepend it with ▢ .
Keep the overall report concise and brief. Do not output any further explanation.
</step>No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Review software architecture, including package cohesion and inter-package coupling
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Discover additional, third-party components (libraries/frameworks) for the technology stack to provide needed functionality.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analyze the source code for problems in either the logic and semantics and its related control flow, performance and efficiency, or security.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Edit Source Code: Use when the user wants to "edit" the code base in one shot from a query or a bare analyzer issue id like "P1", fusing crafting, refactoring, and resolving with optional grilling, verification, looping, and Git worktree isolation.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Explains code with WHAT, WHY, ANALOGY, DIAGRAM, CRUXES, and GOTCHAS. Use when you want to know how code works or when the user asks "how does this work?"
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Give insights into the source code.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.