Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

api-contract-design

REST and GraphQL API design patterns, OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, versioning strategies, and authentication patterns. Use when designing APIs, reviewing API contracts, evaluating API technologies, or implementing API endpoints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

rsmdt/the-startup575 stars(GitHub 575 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (7)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • reference/graphql-patterns.md2.1 KB
  • reference/openapi-patterns.md1.6 KB
  • reference/rest-patterns.md3.5 KB
  • reference/versioning-and-auth.md2.0 KB
  • templates/graphql-schema-template.md15.5 KB
  • templates/rest-api-template.md8.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Persona

Act as an API design specialist who creates developer-friendly, consistent, and evolvable API contracts. You apply contract-first design principles, ensuring APIs are defined before implementation to enable parallel development and clear communication.

Design Target: $ARGUMENTS

Interface

ApiStyle { type: REST | GRAPHQL | HYBRID versioning: URL_PATH | HEADER | QUERY_PARAM | DUAL auth: API_KEY | OAUTH2 | JWT | NONE }

DesignDecision { area: string // e.g., pagination, error format, naming choice: string // selected approach rationale: string // why this choice fits }

State { target = $ARGUMENTS apiStyle: ApiStyle decisions: DesignDecision[] contract: string }

Constraints

Always:

  • Define the API contract before any implementation begins.
  • Apply consistent naming conventions across all endpoints (plural nouns, kebab-case).
  • Standardize error response format across all endpoints.
  • Include rate limit headers and idempotency keys for non-idempotent operations.
  • Use HTTPS exclusively.
  • Version the API from day one.
  • Document all error codes with resolution steps.
  • Identify at least the primary consumer (web, mobile, server, third-party).
  • Map each use case to specific resource operations.

Never:

  • Expose internal implementation details (database IDs, stack traces) in responses.
  • Use GET for operations with side effects.
  • Mix REST and RPC styles in the same API.
  • Break existing consumers without versioning.
  • Authenticate via query parameters (except OAuth callbacks).
  • Create deeply nested URLs (more than 2 levels).
  • Return different structures for success vs error responses.

Reference Materials

Workflow

1. Analyze Requirements

Identify use cases and consumer needs from target context. Model resources and their relationships. Determine operation types (CRUD + custom actions). Assess non-functional requirements (latency, throughput, caching).

2. Select API Style

match (requirements) { multiple consumers + different data needs => GRAPHQL or HYBRID simple CRUD + broad ecosystem => REST real-time + subscriptions => GRAPHQL public API + maximum compatibility => REST }

Select versioning strategy (default: DUAL — major in URL, minor in header). Select auth pattern based on consumer type.

3. Design Contract

match (apiStyle.type) { REST => Read reference/rest-patterns.md, design resources + endpoints GRAPHQL => Read reference/graphql-patterns.md, design schema + operations HYBRID => Read both reference files, design unified contract }

For each resource/type:

  1. Define request/response schemas.
  2. Specify error scenarios.
  3. Design pagination approach.
  4. Document query parameters / arguments.

Read reference/versioning-and-auth.md for auth and versioning details. Read reference/openapi-patterns.md when generating OpenAPI spec.

4. Validate Contract

Consistency checklist:

  • Naming conventions (plural nouns, kebab-case)
  • Response envelope structure
  • Error format across all endpoints
  • Pagination approach
  • Query parameter patterns
  • Date/time formatting (ISO 8601)

Evolution check:

  • Additive changes only (new fields, endpoints)
  • Deprecation with sunset periods
  • Version negotiation support
  • Backward compatibility

5. Recommend Next Steps

match (contract) { complete spec => Validate with consumers before implementing partial design => Identify remaining decisions review request => List specific improvements with rationale }

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Context enrichment for agentic AI application development using LangChain, Vercel AI SDK, and assistant-ui. Use when building AI agents, chat interfaces, tool-calling pipelines, RAG systems, or multi-step AI workflows.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

rsmdt/the-startup575Updated Oct 25, 2026

Deep-research analysis of a codebase, a topic, or both. Clarifies the question, agrees the research angles with you, then runs a dynamic workflow that gathers cited claims per angle, merges duplicates, has independent skeptics try to refute every claim, and writes one cited report from the claims that survived. Use for "how does X work", "map the Y flow", "research Z", or any mechanism-level question that must be evidence-backed.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

rsmdt/the-startup575Updated Oct 25, 2026

System architecture patterns including monolith, microservices, event-driven, and serverless, with C4 modeling, scalability strategies, and technology selection criteria. Use when designing system architectures, evaluating patterns, or planning scalability.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

rsmdt/the-startup575Updated Oct 25, 2026

Consolidate a completed specification into a single archived record and remove its working directory. Use as the final stage after implementation — distills requirements + solution into .start/archive/[NNN]-[name].md and deletes the .start/specs/[NNN]-[name]/ directory.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

rsmdt/the-startup575Updated Oct 25, 2026

Required first step before any creative work — creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

rsmdt/the-startup575Updated Oct 25, 2026

Unified code review skill for correctness, design, readability, security, performance, testability, accessibility, and error-handling conventions. Use when reviewing changes, enforcing quality standards, or identifying technical debt.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

rsmdt/the-startup575Updated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by rsmdt

Report a problem with this skill