Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

harness-security-bench

Benchmark security detection systems against 10 known vulnerabilities and nine harmless decoys. Compare four approaches, including an evolved champion, and receive structured JSON covering detection, false alarms, patch tests, reproduction, unsafe outputs, and overall pass or fail.

OriginalShow the original description

Run `@metaharness/darwin security bench` (upstream "Darwin Shield" / ADR-155) — evolves a champion security-detection harness against a 10-vuln / 9-decoy corpus and grades it on TPR/FPR/patch-pass/repro/unsafe vs four baselines (B0 static, B1 LLM-single-pass, B2 fixed-agent, B3 Darwin-champion). Closest reference implementation for ruflo's own ADR-155 nightly self-learning security harness (PR

See how to install

Good for

  • Comparing security detection approaches
  • Tracking changes in detection and false alarms
  • Flagging failed checks in scheduled benchmarks

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Surfaces the upstream metaharness-darwin security bench command. This is the upstream's own ADR-155 — Darwin Shield — and is the closest reference implementation for ruflo's nightly self-learning security harness (#2417).

Why this matters for ruflo's ADR-155

ruflo's ADR-155 proposes three learning loops (per-dimension confidence, severity calibration, auto-fix bid). Loop A trains on accumulated (finding, dimension, human_outcome) tuples — but the gradient signal is only sound if the underlying detection mechanism converges on a known-good corpus. Darwin Shield evolves exactly that mechanism on a 10-vuln/9-decoy ground-truth set. Running this nightly gives us:

  • Empirical floor: if Darwin Shield's champion can't reach TPR=1/FPR=0 on the bench corpus, our Loop A's reward signal is noise.
  • Drift detection: week-over-week champion fitness deltas surface when the security landscape (or our mutator policy) shifts.
  • Baseline diversity: the 4 baselines (B0–B3) give us 4 anchor points to weight per-dimension confidence against.

Algorithm

Implementation: scripts/security-bench.mjs.

  1. Run metaharness-darwin security bench --population N --cycles N [--seed S] from the installed @metaharness/darwin (pin in _darwin.mjs; one-time cache install only if no installed copy qualifies — never npx).
  2. Default timeout = 3s × 19 evaluations × population × cycles + 30s overhead. At default --population 2 --cycles 1 ≈ 144s; at --population 4 --cycles 3 ≈ 12 min.
  3. Parse the markdown report — overall PASS/FAIL plus per-gate pass/fail rows (gate examples: "TPR improvement ≥ 25% vs fixed", "FPR reduction ≥ 40%", "Patch-test pass rate ≥ 80%", "Reproduction success ≥ 90%", "Unsafe outputs = 0", "Cost increase ≤ 2× fixed", "Beyond SOTA: champion statistically beats previous champion", "Compounding: false-positive repeat-rate drop ≥ 35%").
  4. Parse the baselines-vs-champion table (4 rows: fitness/TPR/FPR/patchPass/ repro/unsafe/cost per harness).
  5. Emit structured JSON. With --alert-on-fail, exit 1 when overall = FAIL.

Output shape

{
  "success": true,
  "data": {
    "overall": { "ok": true, "icon": "✅" },
    "gates": {
      "total": 11,
      "passed": 11,
      "failed": 0,
      "details": [{ "ok": true, "criterion": "TPR improvement ≥ 25% vs fixed harness", "measured": "+150% (B2 0.4 → B3 1)" }, ...]
    },
    "baselines": [
      { "harness": "static-only", "fitness": 0.5665, "tpr": 0.3, "fpr": 1, "unsafe": 0, ... },
      { "harness": "LLM single-pass", "fitness": 0.1365, ... },
      { "harness": "fixed agent", "fitness": 0.598, ... },
      { "harness": "Darwin champion", "fitness": 0.93275, "tpr": 1, "fpr": 0, ... }
    ],
    "rawMarkdown": "...",
    "shape": { "population": 2, "cycles": 1, "seed": null },
    "durationMs": 142000
  }
}

Wiring into ADR-155 nightly harness

The ADR-155 nightly workflow (per #2418 task W1.5) will spawn this as one of the active-pentest dimension's calls — its results become a trajectory record:

{
  "dimension": "mcp-pentest",
  "subdimension": "darwin-shield-bench",
  "champion_fitness": 0.93275,
  "champion_tpr": 1, "champion_fpr": 0,
  "gates_passed": 11, "gates_failed": 0,
  "shape": { "population": 4, "cycles": 3 }
}

Loop A learns: if darwin-shield-bench consistently passes on the seeded corpus, weight findings caught only by mcp-pentest higher.

Exit codes

CodeMeaning
0Bench ran (overall PASS or FAIL — distinguish via JSON overall.ok), or degraded
1--alert-on-fail and overall.ok === false
2Config error or upstream infrastructure failure

Graceful degradation

When @metaharness/darwin is absent, emits {degraded: true, reason: 'metaharness-darwin-not-available'} and exits 0.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Compare models available through the HuggingFace router with chat-ui configuration, research missing models, and write short English descriptions of their architecture and capabilities. Add entries to both production and development configuration files and commit the changes.

  • Adding newly available router models to chat-ui
  • Writing concise descriptions of model capabilities
  • Updating production and development model entries together
ruvnet/ruflo77KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

adr-create

FreeSummary

Create an Architecture Decision Record, a document for recording important design choices, with the next sequential number. It generates a Markdown template, registers the record in AgentDB, and links related decisions found through search.

  • Record the reasoning behind adopting a technology
  • Start an ADR for an API or data model change
  • Document an infrastructure decision
ruvnet/ruflo77KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

adr-index

FreeSummary

Build a searchable index and relationship graph from ADRs, records of architectural decisions. Import two supported document formats, refresh existing metadata without duplicate relationships, and review summaries of statuses, missing references, and inconsistencies.

  • Index ADRs imported from another project
  • Refresh a graph that differs from files on disk
  • Set up ADR tracking in an existing codebase
ruvnet/ruflo77KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

adr-reindex

FreeSummary

Rebuild the index of ADRs, records of architectural decisions, after files or relationship lines are deleted. It clears stored records and relationships, indexes the files still present, and checks that the final record count matches.

  • Rebuild the index after deleting an ADR file
  • Remove stale relationships after editing an ADR
  • Reconcile the ADR index on a schedule
ruvnet/ruflo77KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

adr-review

FreeSummary

Review code changes against accepted Architecture Decision Records, documents that capture agreed design choices. Report violations, outdated references, compliant changes, and areas without ADR coverage, then suggest code fixes or a new decision record where appropriate.

  • Check a pull request before merging
  • Review major code changes against agreed design decisions
  • Find references to superseded ADRs
ruvnet/ruflo77KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

adr-verify

FreeSummary

Check saved architecture decision records (ADRs) for broken references, circular replacement relationships, and inconsistent statuses. Use the results to verify imported records or stop a CI check when selected integrity rules fail.

  • Checking ADR integrity after import
  • Blocking CI when ADR issues are found
  • Reviewing ADR data before a release
ruvnet/ruflo77KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by ruvnet

Report a problem with this skill