Turn research findings stored in memory into structured reports with evidence ratings, source references, and practical recommendations. Compare conflicting claims, identify unresolved questions, and explain limitations so accumulated research can support decisions and next steps.
Synthesize research findings from memory into structured reports with evidence grading, contradiction resolution, and actionable recommendations
Collects research findings saved in memory and turns them into a report that supports decisions and action. It searches findings, references, and previously discovered patterns, then rates evidence as high, medium, or low. When information conflicts, it compares the claims, evidence quality, and recency, and explicitly records contradictions that remain unresolved. It assesses relevance to the original goal and organizes the summary, key findings, methodology, limitations, recommendations, and sources.
Use it after one or more rounds of deep-research when you need a coherent view of the results. It helps when growing research notes make conclusions hard to see, or when you want to separate well-supported information from speculation before deciding what to do next. The consolidated findings can also be consulted later.
Uses accumulated research and tools such as ruflo-core memory search and storage, and AgentDB. Its role is to synthesize saved findings rather than conduct new research. The completed report is saved in research-synthesis.
This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.
AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.
The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 21, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Synthesize accumulated research findings into actionable reports.
After running deep-research (one or multiple times), when you need to pull together findings from memory into a coherent synthesis with recommendations.
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search namespace research for raw findingsmcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search namespace research-sources for referencesmcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__agentdb_pattern-search for discovered patternsmcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__agentdb_context-synthesize for AI-assisted context buildingmcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__neural_predict to score which findings are most relevant to the original goalmcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store namespace research-synthesis with the full report# [Research Topic] — Synthesis Report
## Summary
[2-3 sentence answer]
## Key Findings
1. [Finding] — Evidence: High/Medium/Low
2. [Finding] — Evidence: High/Medium/Low
## Contradictions
- [Claim A] vs [Claim B]: [resolution or "unresolved"]
## Recommendations
1. [Action] — because [reasoning]
## Sources
- [key]: [description]
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Compare models available through the HuggingFace router with chat-ui configuration, research missing models, and write short English descriptions of their architecture and capabilities. Add entries to both production and development configuration files and commit the changes.
Create an Architecture Decision Record, a document for recording important design choices, with the next sequential number. It generates a Markdown template, registers the record in AgentDB, and links related decisions found through search.
Build a searchable index and relationship graph from ADRs, records of architectural decisions. Import two supported document formats, refresh existing metadata without duplicate relationships, and review summaries of statuses, missing references, and inconsistencies.
Rebuild the index of ADRs, records of architectural decisions, after files or relationship lines are deleted. It clears stored records and relationships, indexes the files still present, and checks that the final record count matches.
Review code changes against accepted Architecture Decision Records, documents that capture agreed design choices. Report violations, outdated references, compliant changes, and areas without ADR coverage, then suggest code fixes or a new decision record where appropriate.
Check saved architecture decision records (ADRs) for broken references, circular replacement relationships, and inconsistent statuses. Use the results to verify imported records or stop a CI check when selected integrity rules fail.