Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

ask-codex

Get a second opinion or independent review from Codex (OpenAI) via the local Codex CLI. Use when the user wants Codex to review a design memo, PR, diff, or decision, or to cross-check an approach from another model. Also trigger on "Codexに聞いて", "Codexと相談", "Codexにレビュー", "Codexの意見", "別のモデルで確認".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withOpenAI
See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Purpose

Delegate a focused question or review to Codex (OpenAI's CLI) and relay its answer back to the user as an independent, attributed second opinion.

This skill does not replace your own judgment — it gathers Codex's view so the user can compare it against yours (and against other reviewers such as Antigravity).

How Codex is invoked

The repository ships a project-local Codex config (.codex/config.toml) and a wrapper script. Always call Codex through the script so the project config and working directory are correct:

npm run codex:exec -- "<prompt>"

This runs codex exec non-interactively (CODEX_HOME=.codex, -C <repo root>) and prints Codex's answer to stdout. Codex runs in the repo, so it can read files itself — reference paths in the prompt instead of pasting large files.

Steps

  1. Frame the prompt. Turn the user's request into a single self-contained prompt for Codex. Include:

    • the role ("You are a senior reviewer of River Review …"),
    • the file paths Codex should read (e.g. docs/development/1255-…md, runners/core/review-runner.mjs),
    • the specific questions to answer, numbered,
    • a request to be concise and to state a clear conclusion.
  2. Run Codex with a generous timeout (design reviews can take minutes). Set the timeout on the Bash tool call itself (e.g. timeout: 600000 ms) — do not prefix the command with timeout 600: macOS ships no GNU timeout binary, so that prefix fails with command not found.

    npm run codex:exec -- "<prompt>"
    
  3. Handle authentication failure. If the output contains 401 Unauthorized / Missing bearer / Reconnecting..., Codex is not authenticated. Do not retry blindly. Tell the user to authenticate themselves in this session (these are interactive / secret-bearing and you cannot run them for them):

    • ! CODEX_HOME="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.codex" codex login (the CODEX_HOME prefix is required — a bare codex login writes credentials to ~/.codex and the project-local config keeps failing), or
    • set OPENAI_API_KEY in the environment (warn that pasting a key into chat leaves it in history; prefer env/keychain). Then offer to re-run once authenticated.
  4. Relay faithfully. Quote or summarize Codex's answer and attribute it to Codex ("Codex の見解:"). Keep Codex's conclusion distinct from your own. If you disagree, say so separately — do not silently overwrite its opinion.

  5. Persist when useful. For design decisions, offer to record Codex's verdict in the relevant memo / issue / PR so it is not lost.

Guardrails

  • Never paste secrets or .env contents into the Codex prompt.
  • Codex executes in workspace-write sandbox; treat its file edits as proposals to review, not as automatically trusted changes.
  • This skill is for advisory review. Decisions and commits stay with the user and with you.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

<What this skill does>

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

画像・ボタン・フォーム要素に適切なアクセシブルネームがあるか確認する。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Ensure ADRs capture context, decision, alternatives, tradeoffs, and follow-ups in a way that prevents future drift.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

敵対的分析手法を統合したレビューの entry skill。認知バイアス対策の3手法 (Pre-mortem / War Game / Logic Torturing)と、宣言・主張と実態の乖離を突く claim-vs-actual 検出3パターン(Self-Contradiction / Refactor-Claim Audit / Cross-File Leakage)へルーティングし、通常のレビューでは見えない設計の盲点・ 防御の穴・論理の弱点・宣言と実装のズレを可視化する。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Review changes to the Agent Skills import/export bridge for path safety, round-trip fidelity, and validation correctness.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Checks whether AI-assisted work defines review criteria, accessible context, explicit review loop, human judgment boundary, and feedback capture before delegating to an agent.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by s977043

Report a problem with this skill