Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

Normalization Consistency Review

Detect inconsistencies in ID formatting, date/time display, monetary amounts, and enum/status labels compared to existing patterns in the codebase.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (5)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB
  • fixtures/01-inline-date-format.md1.7 KB
  • fixtures/01-should-detect.md977 B
  • fixtures/02-shared-utility-consistent.md1.6 KB
  • fixtures/02-should-not-detect.md704 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Pattern declaration

Primary pattern: Reviewer Secondary patterns: Inversion Why: 正規化の不整合は差分単体では見えにくく、既存コードとの比較が必要

Guidance

  • Compare new date/time formatting with existing patterns (e.g., mixing format(date, 'yyyy/MM/dd') with date.toLocaleDateString(), or dayjs vs date-fns).
  • Check monetary amount display: inconsistent currency symbols, decimal places, or formatting utilities (toLocaleString vs Intl.NumberFormat).
  • Check ID formatting: mixing hyphenated UUIDs with non-hyphenated, or mixing numeric IDs with string IDs in the same context.
  • Check enum/status label rendering: if existing code uses a statusLabel() helper, flag direct string literals for status values.
  • Flag when new code introduces a different normalization approach for the same data type.

Non-goals

  • 意図的なフォーマット差異(管理画面と公開画面の表示形式が異なる等)は指摘しない。
  • テストコード内のハードコードされた値は対象外。

Pre-execution Gate / 実行前ゲート

このスキルは以下の条件がすべて満たされない限りNO_REVIEWを返す。

  • 差分にUI表示に関連するコード(date, amount, id, status labelの表示処理)が含まれている
  • または差分にフォーマット処理関数の変更が含まれている

ゲート不成立時の出力: NO_REVIEW: normalization-consistency — 表示正規化に関連する変更が検出されない

False-positive guards

  • 既存パターンと同じユーティリティを使っている場合は指摘しない。
  • コメントやdoc stringのみの変更は対象外。

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

<What this skill does>

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

画像・ボタン・フォーム要素に適切なアクセシブルネームがあるか確認する。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Ensure ADRs capture context, decision, alternatives, tradeoffs, and follow-ups in a way that prevents future drift.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

敵対的分析手法を統合したレビューの entry skill。認知バイアス対策の3手法 (Pre-mortem / War Game / Logic Torturing)と、宣言・主張と実態の乖離を突く claim-vs-actual 検出3パターン(Self-Contradiction / Refactor-Claim Audit / Cross-File Leakage)へルーティングし、通常のレビューでは見えない設計の盲点・ 防御の穴・論理の弱点・宣言と実装のズレを可視化する。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Review changes to the Agent Skills import/export bridge for path safety, round-trip fidelity, and validation correctness.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

Checks whether AI-assisted work defines review criteria, accessible context, explicit review loop, human judgment boundary, and feedback capture before delegating to an agent.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

s977043/river-review7Updated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by s977043

Report a problem with this skill