Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

golang-testing

Write, review, audit, and debug Go tests that check observable behavior. Covers named test cases, integration test isolation, concurrent execution, race and goroutine leak detection, and finding causes of intermittent failures or gaps in test coverage.

OriginalShow the original description

Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark`.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Adding tests for edge cases and error paths
  • Reviewing test changes in a pull request
  • Auditing unit and integration test isolation
  • Debugging intermittent failures and concurrency issues

Files included (9)

  • SKILL.md17.5 KB
  • evals/evals.json21.5 KB
  • references/benchmarks.md1.9 KB
  • references/coverage.md1.8 KB
  • references/examples.md1.9 KB
  • references/helpers.md1.0 KB
  • references/http-testing.md2.2 KB
  • references/integration-testing.md4.4 KB
  • references/mocking.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.

Thinking mode: Reason as thoroughly as possible for test strategy design and failure analysis — shallow reasoning misses edge cases and produces brittle tests that pass today but break tomorrow. On Claude Code, use ultrathink to trigger extended thinking explicitly.

Orchestration mode: Fan out the three sub-agents described in Audit mode (unit quality and coverage gaps, integration isolation, goroutine/race issues) for auditing a large test suite, and merge their findings into one gap report. On Claude Code, use ultracode to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.

Modes:

  • Write mode — generating new tests for existing or new code. Work sequentially through the code under test; use gotests to scaffold table-driven tests, then enrich with edge cases and error paths.
  • Review mode — reviewing a PR's test changes. Focus on the diff: check coverage of new behaviour, assertion quality, table-driven structure, and absence of flakiness patterns. Sequential.
  • Audit mode — auditing an existing test suite for gaps, flakiness, or bad patterns (order-dependent tests, missing t.Parallel(), implementation-detail coupling). Launch up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) unit test quality and coverage gaps, (2) integration test isolation and build tags, (3) goroutine leaks and race conditions.
  • Debug mode — a test is failing or flaky. Work sequentially: reproduce reliably, isolate the failing assertion, trace the root cause in production code or test setup.

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill takes precedence.

Dependencies:

  • gotests: go install github.com/cweill/gotests/gotests@latest

Go Testing Best Practices

This skill guides the creation of production-ready tests for Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, fast, and reliable tests.

Best Practices Summary

  1. Table-driven tests MUST use named subtests -- every test case needs a name field passed to t.Run
  2. Integration tests MUST use build tags (//go:build integration) to separate from unit tests
  3. Tests MUST NOT depend on execution order -- each test MUST be independently runnable
  4. Independent tests SHOULD use t.Parallel() when possible
  5. Tests MUST assert observable behavior and public API contracts, not implementation details -- a test coupled to internals turns every refactor into a test rewrite while proving nothing about the contract
  6. Packages with goroutines SHOULD use goleak.VerifyTestMain in TestMain to detect goroutine leaks
  7. Use testify as helpers, not a replacement for standard library
  8. Mock interfaces, not concrete types
  9. Keep unit tests fast (< 1ms), use build tags for integration tests
  10. Run tests with race detection in CI
  11. Include examples as executable documentation
  12. Test files MUST be named after the source file under test, not after the function or method being tested
  13. Test functions SHOULD appear in the same order as the functions/methods they test in the source file

Test Structure and Organization

File Conventions

// package_test.go - tests in same package (white-box, access unexported)
package mypackage

// mypackage_test.go - tests in test package (black-box, public API only)
package mypackage_test

Name the test file after the source file it tests, not after the function or method under test. Go's convention is one test file per source file (foo.go -> foo_test.go), because tools (go test, coverage reports, IDE "jump to test" navigation, gotests) and reviewers all resolve tests by source file, not by symbol. A source file usually declares several functions/methods; splitting its tests by symbol name scatters them across many files and breaks that file-to-file mapping.

// ✓ Good — one test file per source file
helloworld.go       -> helloworld_test.go   // contains TestHelloWorld, TestAbcd, TestXyz, ...

// ✗ Bad — test file named after the function/method instead of the source file
helloworld.go       -> abcd_test.go         // wrong: should be helloworld_test.go

Exception: very large source files MAY be split into multiple _test.go files by concern (e.g. foo_test.go + foo_edgecases_test.go), but each split file's name MUST still be derived from the source file name, never from an individual function name. Prefer keeping a single _test.go file per source file even when it grows large — splitting adds navigation overhead and is rarely worth it; reach for the exception only when a single file becomes genuinely unwieldy to browse or review.

Within a test file, order test functions to match the order their tested functions/methods appear in the source file. A reader (human or agent) scrolling foo.go alongside foo_test.go can then find the matching test by position instead of searching; drift between the two orderings compounds every time either file grows.

Naming Conventions

func TestAdd(t *testing.T) { ... }               // function test
func TestMyStruct_MyMethod(t *testing.T) { ... } // method test
func BenchmarkAdd(b *testing.B) { ... }          // benchmark
func ExampleAdd() { ... }                        // example
func FuzzAdd(f *testing.F) { ... }               // fuzz test

Table-Driven Tests

Table-driven tests are the idiomatic Go way to test multiple scenarios. Always name each test case.

func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name     string
        quantity int
        unitPrice float64
        expected  float64
    }{
        {
            name:      "single item",
            quantity:  1,
            unitPrice: 10.0,
            expected:  10.0,
        },
        {
            name:      "bulk discount - 100 items",
            quantity:  100,
            unitPrice: 10.0,
            expected:  900.0, // 10% discount
        },
        {
            name:      "zero quantity",
            quantity:  0,
            unitPrice: 10.0,
            expected:  0.0,
        },
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got := CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)
            if got != tt.expected {
                t.Errorf("CalculatePrice(%d, %.2f) = %.2f, want %.2f",
                    tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice, got, tt.expected)
            }
        })
    }
}

Common Pitfall: Assert Scope Leaking into Subtests

Never create a testify assert/require instance in the parent test function and reuse it inside t.Run closures. assert.New(t) captures the exact *testing.T it was built with, so if that t belongs to the parent, every failure raised inside the subtest gets attributed to the parent test in go test output — the failing subtest itself still reports --- PASS, silently hiding which case broke. This happens whether or not the subtest calls t.Parallel().

// WRONG -- `is` is bound to the parent's t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
    is := assert.New(t)
    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)) // misattributed on failure
        })
    }
}

// RIGHT -- each subtest builds its own instance from its own t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            is := assert.New(t)
            is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice))
        })
    }
}

Verify with a deliberately-broken case: if go test -v -run TestName shows --- FAIL: TestName but every --- PASS: TestName/subtest_name line still says PASS, the assert scope is leaking.

Unit Tests

Unit tests should be fast (< 1ms), isolated (no external dependencies), and deterministic.

Testing HTTP Handlers

Use httptest for handler tests with table-driven patterns. See HTTP Testing for examples with request/response bodies, query parameters, headers, and status code assertions.

Goroutine Leak Detection with goleak

Use go.uber.org/goleak to detect leaking goroutines, especially for concurrent code:

import (
    "testing"
    "go.uber.org/goleak"
)

func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
    goleak.VerifyTestMain(m)
}

To exclude specific goroutine stacks (for known leaks or library goroutines):

func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
    goleak.VerifyTestMain(m,
        goleak.IgnoreCurrent(),
    )
}

Or per-test:

func TestWorkerPool(t *testing.T) {
    defer goleak.VerifyNone(t)
    // ... test code ...
}

testing/synctest for Deterministic Goroutine Testing

testing/synctest (Go 1.25+) provides deterministic tests for goroutines, timers, deadlines, and context cancellation. Time advances only when all goroutines are blocked, making ordering predictable.

When to use synctest instead of real time:

  • Testing concurrent code with time-based operations (time.Sleep, time.After, time.Ticker)
  • When race conditions need to be reproducible
  • When tests are flaky due to timing issues
import (
    "context"
    "testing"
    "testing/synctest"
    "time"
)

func TestContextTimeout(t *testing.T) {
    synctest.Test(t, func(t *testing.T) {
        const timeout = 5 * time.Second

        ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(t.Context(), timeout)
        defer cancel()

        time.Sleep(timeout - time.Nanosecond)
        synctest.Wait()
        if err := ctx.Err(); err != nil {
            t.Fatalf("before timeout: %v", err)
        }

        time.Sleep(time.Nanosecond)
        synctest.Wait()
        if err := ctx.Err(); err != context.DeadlineExceeded {
            t.Fatalf("after timeout: got %v, want DeadlineExceeded", err)
        }
    })
}

Use synctest.Test in Go 1.25+ and later. Do not use the old Go 1.24 experimental synctest.Run API in Go 1.25+ code. If a module explicitly targets Go 1.24 and opts into GOEXPERIMENT=synctest, use the old API only as a compatibility fallback.

Key differences in synctest:

  • time.Sleep advances synthetic time instantly when the goroutine blocks
  • time.After fires when synthetic time reaches the duration
  • All goroutines run to blocking points before time advances
  • Test execution is deterministic and repeatable
  • Go 1.27+ adds synctest.Sleep(d) as a direct helper to advance the bubble's fake clock, equivalent to time.Sleep(d) followed by synctest.Wait() but without needing a real goroutine to block on

Go 1.27+ also adds httptest.NewTestServer(), an in-memory fake-network variant of httptest.NewServer that composes with synctest — no real socket, so server tests can run inside a synctest.Test bubble instead of needing httptest.NewServer plus real timers.

Test Timeouts

For tests that may hang, use a timeout helper that panics with caller location. See Helpers.

Benchmarks

Write benchmarks as sub-benchmarks (b.Run per variant) so each variant gets its own name in the output — that name is what comparison tooling diffs. For Go 1.24+, use b.Loop() rather than a b.N loop.

→ See Benchmarks in a Test Suite for the code shape and size-parameterized examples.

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for measurement methodology: benchstat, profiling from benchmarks, and CI regression detection.

Go 1.26+: test artifacts

When a test, benchmark, or fuzz target needs to persist files for inspection, use ArtifactDir() instead of ad-hoc paths or repo-local output.

func TestRenderGoldenArtifact(t *testing.T) {
    dir := t.ArtifactDir()

    out := filepath.Join(dir, "rendered.json")
    if err := os.WriteFile(out, renderedBytes, 0o644); err != nil {
        t.Fatal(err)
    }

    t.Logf("artifact written: %s", out)
}

Available on *testing.T, *testing.B, and *testing.F in Go 1.26+.

Go 1.27+: stdversion runs automatically

go test now invokes the stdversion vet check by default, flagging any use of an API newer than the module's go directive. A CI failure from this check means either the go directive needs bumping or the code needs to stop using the newer API — it is not a check to silence.

Parallel Tests

Use t.Parallel() to run tests concurrently:

func TestParallelOperations(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name string
        data []byte
    }{
        {"small data", make([]byte, 1024)},
        {"medium data", make([]byte, 1024*1024)},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            t.Parallel()
            is := assert.New(t)

            result := Process(tt.data)
            is.NotNil(result)
        })
    }
}

Fuzzing

Use fuzzing to find edge cases and bugs:

func FuzzReverse(f *testing.F) {
    f.Add("hello")
    f.Add("")
    f.Add("a")

    f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, input string) {
        reversed := Reverse(input)
        doubleReversed := Reverse(reversed)
        if input != doubleReversed {
            t.Errorf("Reverse(Reverse(%q)) = %q, want %q", input, doubleReversed, input)
        }
    })
}

Examples as Documentation

ExampleXxx functions are executable documentation: go test compares their stdout to the // Output: comment, so a drifting example fails the build instead of misleading readers.

→ See Examples as Documentation for naming rules, Unordered output, and placement.

Code Coverage

Generate a profile with go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./..., then read the uncovered lines with go tool cover -html=coverage.out. Coverage locates untested paths; it does not measure assertion quality, so treat a percentage as a gap finder rather than a target.

→ See Code Coverage for coverage modes, -coverpkg, and reporting pitfalls.

Integration Tests

Use build tags to separate integration tests from unit tests:

//go:build integration

package mypackage

func TestDatabaseIntegration(t *testing.T) {
    db, err := sql.Open("postgres", os.Getenv("DATABASE_URL"))
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatal(err)
    }
    defer db.Close()

    // Test real database operations
}

Run integration tests separately:

go test -tags=integration ./...

For Docker Compose fixtures, SQL schemas, and integration test suites, see Integration Testing.

Mocking

Mock interfaces, not concrete types. Define interfaces where consumed, then create mock implementations.

For mock patterns, test fixtures, and time mocking, see Mocking.

Enforce with Linters

Many test best practices are enforced automatically by linters: thelper, paralleltest, testifylint. See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for configuration and usage.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify skill for detailed testify API (assert, require, mock, suite)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill (testing.md) for database integration test patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency skill for goroutine leak detection with goleak
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skill for CI test configuration and GitHub Actions workflows
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for testifylint and paralleltest configuration
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skill for automated AI-driven code review in CI using these guidelines

Quick Reference

go test ./...                          # all tests
go test -run TestName ./...            # specific test by exact name
go test -run TestName/subtest ./...    # subtests within a test
go test -run 'Test(Add|Sub)' ./...     # multiple tests (regexp OR)
go test -run 'Test[A-Z]' ./...         # tests starting with capital letter
go test -run 'TestUser.*' ./...        # tests matching prefix
go test -run '.*Validation.*' ./...    # tests containing substring
go test -run TestName/. ./...          # all subtests of TestName
go test -run '/(unit|integration)' ./... # filter by subtest name
go test -race ./...                    # race detection
go test -cover ./...                   # coverage summary
go test -bench=. -benchmem ./...       # benchmarks
go test -fuzz=FuzzName ./...           # fuzzing
go test -tags=integration ./...        # integration tests

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

golang-benchmark

FreeSummary

Measure Go performance by writing benchmarks, examining CPU and memory profiles, and comparing repeated runs with benchstat. Use the results to assess code changes, detect slowdowns in CI, and investigate production performance.

  • Compare performance before and after a code change
  • Investigate CPU usage and memory allocations
  • Detect performance regressions in CI
samber/cc-skills-golang3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

golang-cli

FreeSummary

Build, extend, or review Go command-line tools with clear commands, flags, and configuration priorities. It guides output formats, exit codes, shell completion, cancellation, and tests so tools behave predictably in scripts and terminals.

  • Build a Go command-line tool with subcommands
  • Combine flags, environment variables, and configuration files
  • Review output and exit codes for use in scripts
samber/cc-skills-golang3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Make Go code easier to read by reviewing line breaks, variable declarations, branching, function parameters, and file organization. Provides concrete style guidance for implementation, code reviews, and project standards where formatting tools alone cannot judge clarity.

  • Reviewing Go code for readability
  • Simplifying nested branches and complex conditions
  • Improving long function signatures and calls
samber/cc-skills-golang3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Design and review concurrent Go code with clear goroutine ownership, shutdown paths, and error handling. Choose channels, locks, or atomic operations to protect shared data, and structure worker pools with controlled concurrency and cancellation.

  • Design goroutine shutdown and cancellation
  • Choose channels or mutexes for concurrent code
  • Protect shared maps and counters
samber/cc-skills-golang3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

golang-context

FreeSummary

Design how Go requests carry cancellation signals, time limits, and request metadata through application layers. Helps investigate work that continues after cancellation, choose suitable context types, and separate background tasks from the request lifecycle.

  • Reviewing context propagation from HTTP handlers to database calls
  • Investigating missing cancellation and lingering timers
  • Keeping background work running after a request ends
samber/cc-skills-golang3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Set up or improve GitHub Actions pipelines for Go projects. Configure automated tests, code checks, vulnerability scans, dependency update bots, releases, and Docker publishing, with workflow templates and repository settings that control permissions and merge requirements.

  • Set up automated tests and code checks for Go
  • Add vulnerability scanning to a pipeline
  • Configure dependency update bots
samber/cc-skills-golang3.6KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by samber

Report a problem with this skill