Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

prd

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • references/sandbase-api-map.md974 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Product Requirements Document (PRD)

Overview

Design comprehensive, production-grade Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) that bridge the gap between business vision and technical execution. This skill works for modern software systems, ensuring that requirements are clearly defined.

When external product, market, or technical evidence is needed, read the SandBase API map. Resolve the listed capability with sandbase_discover, inspect its returned name with sandbase_inspect, then follow execute_as to call sandbase_run(name: "<returned name>", arguments: { ... }) using only the current schema. For async results, poll sandbase_run_get with the returned run_id within the task budget; report pending or failed runs without automatically resubmitting them.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Starting a new product or feature development cycle
  • Translating a vague idea into a concrete technical specification
  • Defining requirements for AI-powered features
  • Stakeholders need a unified "source of truth" for project scope
  • User asks to "write a PRD", "document requirements", or "plan a feature"

Operational Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery (The Interview)

Before drafting the PRD, identify material knowledge gaps and ask only for information that cannot be safely inferred or marked TBD.

Ask about:

  • The Core Problem: Why are we building this now?
  • Success Metrics: How do we know it worked?
  • Constraints: Budget, tech stack, or deadline?

Phase 2: Analysis & Scoping

Synthesize the user's input. Identify dependencies and hidden complexities.

  • Map out the User Flow.
  • Define Non-Goals to protect the timeline.

Phase 3: Technical Drafting

Generate the document using the Strict PRD Schema below.


PRD Quality Standards

Requirements Quality

Use concrete, measurable criteria. Avoid "fast", "easy", or "intuitive".

# Vague (BAD)
- The search should be fast and return relevant results.
- The UI must look modern and be easy to use.

# Concrete (GOOD)
+ The search must return results within 200ms for a 10k record dataset.
+ The search algorithm must achieve >= 85% Precision@10 in benchmark evals.
+ The UI must follow the 'Vercel/Next.js' design system and achieve 100% Lighthouse Accessibility score.

Strict PRD Schema

You MUST follow this exact structure for the output:

1. Executive Summary

  • Problem Statement: 1-2 sentences on the pain point.
  • Proposed Solution: 1-2 sentences on the fix.
  • Success Criteria: 3-5 measurable KPIs.

2. User Experience & Functionality

  • User Personas: Who is this for?
  • User Stories: As a [user], I want to [action] so that [benefit].
  • Acceptance Criteria: Bulleted list of "Done" definitions for each story.
  • Non-Goals: What are we NOT building?

3. AI System Requirements (If Applicable)

  • Tool Requirements: What tools and APIs are needed?
  • Evaluation Strategy: How to measure output quality and accuracy.

4. Technical Specifications

  • Architecture Overview: Data flow and component interaction.
  • Integration Points: APIs, DBs, and Auth.
  • Security & Privacy: Data handling and compliance.

5. Risks & Roadmap

  • Phased Rollout: MVP -> v1.1 -> v2.0.
  • Technical Risks: Latency, cost, or dependency failures.

Implementation Guidelines

DO (Always)

  • Define Testing: For AI systems, specify how to test and validate output quality.
  • Iterate: Present a draft and ask for feedback on specific sections.

DON'T (Avoid)

  • Skip Discovery: Do not hide unresolved critical gaps; ask focused questions or mark non-critical unknowns as TBD.
  • Hallucinate Constraints: If the user didn't specify a tech stack, ask or label it as TBD.

Example: Intelligent Search System

1. Executive Summary

Problem: Users struggle to find specific documentation snippets in massive repositories. Solution: An intelligent search system that provides direct answers with source citations. Success:

  • Reduce search time by 50%.
  • Citation accuracy >= 95%.

2. User Stories

  • Story: As a developer, I want to ask natural language questions so I don't have to guess keywords.
  • AC:
    • Supports multi-turn clarification.
    • Returns code blocks with "Copy" button.

3. AI System Architecture

  • Tools Required: repository search, text search, and authorized web-retrieval capabilities.

4. Evaluation

  • Benchmark: Test with 50 common developer questions.
  • Pass Rate: 90% must match expected citations.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Search academic papers, scholarly articles, and research publications through SandBase. Use when asked for literature review, academic citations, scholarly research, paper discovery, or scientific evidence gathering.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sandbaseai/sandbase-skills200Updated Sep 26, 2026

Research emerging academic trends by combining scholarly databases, web sources, and news to identify rising research areas, breakthrough papers, and shifting scientific consensus. Ideal for R&D teams tracking frontier science.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sandbaseai/sandbase-skills200Updated Sep 26, 2026

Create, implement, or review accessibility review work with format, accessibility, performance, and visual-verification controls. Use when the requested deliverable depends on accessibility review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sandbaseai/sandbase-skills200Updated Sep 26, 2026

Plan, implement, or review agentic eval work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests agentic eval work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sandbaseai/sandbase-skills200Updated Sep 26, 2026

ai-seo

Free

Create or review ai seo deliverables with audience, evidence, voice, and conversion-quality controls. Use when the user explicitly asks for ai seo work.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sandbaseai/sandbase-skills200Updated Sep 26, 2026

Apply airflow dag patterns in reproducible local data workflows with version-aware APIs, explicit assumptions, and validation. Use when the user chooses airflow dag patterns or its strengths fit the task.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sandbaseai/sandbase-skills200Updated Sep 26, 2026

See all skills by sandbaseai

Report a problem with this skill