Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

exploitability-analyzer

Adversarially assess whether a verified bug primitive can be exercised by a realistic attacker in production and produce the claimed security impact with measurable reliability.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Sekolah76/syadagentic92 stars(GitHub 92 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • references/domain-checks.md796 B
  • templates/exploitability-analysis.yaml962 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Exploitability Analyzer

Mission

Bridge the gap between “the defect exists” and “an attacker can exploit it.” Evaluate reachability, controllability, prerequisites, mitigations, reliability, economics, timing, victim interaction, deployment relevance, and impact realization.

This skill must actively search for blockers and must not reward optimistic assumptions.

Required inputs

  • Verified primitive and evidence.
  • Root-cause analysis.
  • Target scope and threat model.
  • Deployment/configuration profile.
  • Claimed impact and proposed attack path.

Exploitability dimensions

1. Attacker position

Classify the least-privileged realistic attacker:

  • remote unauthenticated;
  • authenticated ordinary user;
  • cross-tenant user;
  • malicious contract/token/peer;
  • relayer/oracle/validator subset;
  • local user;
  • administrator/insider;
  • compromised host or victim malware.

2. Reachability

Confirm the production path from attacker input to primitive. Account for upstream proxies, gateways, middleware, feature flags, network topology, compile profile, and default configuration.

3. Controllability

Determine exactly which values, ordering, timing, state, identities, signatures, balances, or messages the attacker controls. Partial control must not be treated as arbitrary control.

4. Preconditions

List every prerequisite and classify:

  • attacker-provided;
  • naturally occurring;
  • victim-dependent;
  • privileged;
  • rare/race-dependent;
  • out-of-scope compromise;
  • economically acquired.

5. Mitigations and blockers

Search for:

  • validation at another layer;
  • rate limits and quotas;
  • authentication/authorization binding;
  • sandboxing and process isolation;
  • supervisor restart and redundancy;
  • transaction reversion and atomicity;
  • slippage, liquidity, fees, finality, and MEV competition;
  • quorum, honest-majority, replay protection, and deterministic checks;
  • monitoring, circuit breakers, caps, timelocks, pause controls;
  • user warnings or explicit confirmations.

6. Reliability

Measure or bound:

  • success rate;
  • attempts required;
  • timing window;
  • race reproducibility;
  • environmental sensitivity;
  • persistence;
  • ability to repeat or scale;
  • detectability and interruption risk.

Do not use “reliable” without repeated evidence.

7. Impact realization

Separate primitive from final impact:

verified primitive → intermediate capability → boundary crossed → measurable impact

Examples:

  • worker panic is not automatically service-wide DoS;
  • token disclosure is not automatically account takeover;
  • arbitrary external call is not automatically fund loss;
  • local state mismatch is not automatically consensus divergence;
  • temporary oracle deviation is not automatically extractable profit.

8. Economic and operational feasibility

For Web3 record capital, liquidity, slippage, fees, gas, unwind, net value, transaction ordering, oracle windows, and recoverability.

For Web2 record infrastructure scale, victim interaction, request volume, access durability, cloud permissions, and operational blast radius.

Confidence caps

Apply these maximum confidence values unless stronger evidence exists:

  • path not proven: 45;
  • attacker control inferred only: 55;
  • production configuration unknown: 60;
  • primitive reproduced but final impact not demonstrated: 70;
  • relies on rare race without statistics: 65;
  • requires excluded compromise or malware: classify threat-model mismatch;
  • economic profitability not modeled: 70 for financial impact;
  • consensus/network-wide effect not reproduced or formally established: 75.

Verdicts

  • PRACTICALLY_EXPLOITABLE
  • CONDITIONALLY_EXPLOITABLE
  • THEORETICAL_ONLY
  • BLOCKED_BY_MITIGATION
  • THREAT_MODEL_MISMATCH
  • INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE

Output

Use templates/exploitability-analysis.yaml. Required next tests must be minimal, safe, and specific.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Sekolah76/syadagentic92Updated Aug 27, 2026

Web2 attack chain plugin — apply Web2 trust boundaries and composition rules on top of attack-chaining-core for authorized testing of web apps, APIs, identity, cloud, and internal services.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Sekolah76/syadagentic92Updated Aug 27, 2026

Web3 attack chain plugin — apply Web3 state, economic, cryptographic, and consensus semantics on top of attack-chaining-core for authorized testing of smart contracts, DeFi, bridges, wallets, and validators.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Sekolah76/syadagentic92Updated Aug 27, 2026

Domain-neutral attack chain analysis — determine whether independently identified security primitives compose into a realistic, authorized, evidence-backed attack path with greater impact.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Sekolah76/syadagentic92Updated Aug 27, 2026

Build an evidence-backed map of externally and internally reachable attack surfaces, trust boundaries, privileged transitions, security assets, and high-value audit targets before vulnerability hunting.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Sekolah76/syadagentic92Updated Aug 27, 2026

Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Sekolah76/syadagentic92Updated Aug 27, 2026

See all skills by Sekolah76

Report a problem with this skill