Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

calibrate

Use when workflow components are inconsistent, naming conventions vary, or a new team member's work needs alignment to project standards.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sharpdeveye/maestro591 stars(GitHub 591 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first. Consult the prompt-engineering reference in the agent-workflow skill for naming and style consistency patterns.


Ensure consistency across all workflow components. Inconsistency creates confusion — for the model, for developers, and for users.

Calibration Dimensions

Naming Conventions

  • Tool names follow consistent pattern (verb_noun, noun.verb, or camelCase — pick one)
  • Agent names follow consistent pattern
  • Configuration keys follow consistent pattern
  • File names follow consistent pattern

Prompt Style

  • All prompts use the same structural pattern (4-zone)
  • Consistent delimiter style (XML tags, markdown headers, triple-dash)
  • Consistent output schema format (JSON schema, markdown template)
  • Consistent instruction style (imperative, numbered steps)

Error Handling

  • All tools return errors in the same format
  • Error codes follow consistent scheme
  • Error messages follow consistent tone
  • Retry logic uses consistent strategy

Logging

  • All logs use the same format (JSON structured, text, etc.)
  • Consistent field names across all log entries
  • Consistent log levels (debug, info, warn, error)
  • Consistent PII redaction approach

Calibration Process

  1. Identify the standard: What's the most common pattern in the existing codebase? That's the standard.
  2. List deviations: Find all components that deviate from the standard.
  3. Prioritize: Fix the most impactful deviations first (user-facing > internal).
  4. Apply: Make the changes, ensuring tests still pass.
  5. Document: Update .maestro.md with the established conventions.

Consistency Audit Table

DimensionStandardDeviations FoundPriority
Tool naming?? of ? toolsHigh/Med/Low
Prompt structure?? of ? promptsHigh/Med/Low
Error format?? of ? toolsHigh/Med/Low
Log format?? of ? entriesHigh/Med/Low

Calibration Checklist

  • Convention standard identified for each dimension
  • All deviations listed with location
  • Highest impact deviations fixed first
  • Tests pass after each calibration change
  • Updated .maestro.md with established conventions

Recommended Next Step

After calibration, run /refine for a final polish pass, or /evaluate to verify consistency improvements.

NEVER:

  • Invent new conventions when existing ones work
  • Calibrate in a way that changes behavior (this is standardization, not refactoring)
  • Skip test verification after calibration
  • Change naming conventions without updating all references

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when the workflow is too slow, too expensive, or both and needs latency, cost, or token usage optimization.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sharpdeveye/maestro591Updated Apr 29, 2026

Use when porting a workflow to a different AI provider, deployment environment, model tier, or organizational context.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sharpdeveye/maestro591Updated Apr 29, 2026

Use when any Maestro command is invoked — provides foundational workflow design principles across prompt engineering, context management, tool orchestration, agent architecture, feedback loops, knowledge systems, and guardrails.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sharpdeveye/maestro591Updated Apr 29, 2026

Use when the workflow works but needs to handle more complex cases or produce higher-quality output through better tools, context, prompts, or models.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sharpdeveye/maestro591Updated Apr 29, 2026

Capture a session summary — what was done, what decisions were made, and what to do next.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sharpdeveye/maestro591Updated Apr 29, 2026

chain

Free

Use when the workflow needs multi-step processing with sequential, parallel, or conditional tool compositions and proper data flow.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

sharpdeveye/maestro591Updated Apr 29, 2026

See all skills by sharpdeveye

Report a problem with this skill