Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

agent-qa-result-triage

Investigate failed Agent QA runs using recorded steps, logs, and saved evidence. Classify each failure, explain confidence and supporting findings, and identify the likely area to fix and the next action.

OriginalShow the original description

Triage failed Agent QA runs with MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, fixed failure categories, confidence, and actionable next steps.

See how to install

Good for

  • Investigating a failed or interrupted Agent QA run
  • Reviewing saved evidence and execution logs
  • Comparing recurring failures across recent runs
  • Identifying the likely team or component responsible

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB
  • references/triage-categories.md1.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Agent QA Result Triage

Overview

Classify a failed Agent QA run from its recorded evidence instead of guessing. Inspect the run, steps, artifacts, and logs; choose one fixed category; and return confidence, likely ownership, and the next evidence-backed action.

When to Use

  • Investigating a failed or interrupted Agent QA run.
  • Inspecting run artifacts, step results, or execution logs.
  • Comparing recent related runs for recurring failure patterns.
  • Deciding whether a failure belongs to a test, product, hook, browser/mobile runtime, or infrastructure owner.

Workflow

  1. Start with agent_qa_get_run for run status, suite child context, steps, and attempts.
  2. Fetch evidence before deciding:
    • agent_qa_get_run_artifact
    • agent_qa_get_run_steps
    • agent_qa_get_run_logs
    • agent_qa_get_run_execution_logs
  3. Call agent_qa_classify_failure and use its category as the default classification unless stronger evidence contradicts it.
  4. Compare recent related runs when they are available in the classifier output.
  5. Return a concise triage result: category, confidence, evidence, likely fix area, and next action.
  6. For code changes, switch to agent-qa-debug-fix after triage is complete.

Categories

Use exactly one category from references/triage-categories.md:

  • timeout
  • appium_startup
  • browser_disconnect
  • element_not_found
  • assertion_failure
  • hook_failure
  • infrastructure
  • unknown_failure

Evidence Rules

  • Quote or summarize concrete artifact, log, or step evidence.
  • Mention missing artifact sections when they limit confidence.
  • Do not invent screenshots, videos, logs, or memory context that MCP did not return.
  • If MCP is unavailable, use dashboard REST APIs or Agent QA CLI output as a fallback and state which evidence was unavailable.
  • Redact credentials, session tokens, personal data, and unrelated application content from the report.

Example

{
  "category": "element_not_found",
  "confidence": "high",
  "evidence": ["Step 4 could not resolve the described checkout button"],
  "likely_fix_area": "test definition or changed product UI",
  "next_action": "Inspect the captured UI context, then compare the current checkout screen"
}

Limitations

  • Classification is only as reliable as the retained run artifacts and logs.
  • A failure category identifies the most likely failure surface; it does not prove root cause.
  • Missing screenshots, DOM/accessibility context, device logs, or prior runs must lower confidence.
  • This skill does not modify tests or application code; use agent-qa-debug-fix for an authorized repair.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Assess a new or existing AI project by examining its code, goals, and constraints. Recommend skills confirmed to exist in the available registry, then outline tasks and implementation phases with dependencies, completion criteria, and checks.

  • Planning the first steps of a new AI project
  • Assessing technical issues in an existing project
  • Selecting relevant skills from an available registry
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

007

FreeSummary

Review code and infrastructure for security risks, map potential threats, and plan stronger defenses. The skill covers OWASP checks, attack and defense exercises, and incident response, with validation required for each environment.

  • Reviewing code and infrastructure security
  • Mapping threats with STRIDE or PASTA
  • Planning stronger security settings
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Turn a repeatable task into an Andru.ia skill with clear inputs, outputs, examples, and limits. Draft SKILL.md, check the folder structure and required validations, and prepare a pull request describing the changes for review.

  • Creating a skill for a repeatable task
  • Improving an existing skill’s examples and limits
  • Validating skill files and preparing a pull request
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare an industry briefing once a project's sector is defined. It covers sector context, potentially applicable regulations, familiar interface patterns, technology choices, and risks, while separating verified evidence from hypotheses and questions requiring further review.

  • Researching industry requirements before product design
  • Checking regulations for a project's jurisdiction
  • Choosing interface patterns familiar to target users
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Create presentation drafts from text, outlines, or documents through the 2slides API. Match a reference image's style, choose themes, add AI voice narration, and export slide images or audio for review and use.

  • Create a presentation from text or an outline
  • Summarize a document into slides
  • Match slide styling to a reference image
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Plan a 360-degree or peer feedback process and create empty response templates from confirmed requirements. Produces consistent CSV, SQL, JSON Schema, or Notion property mappings while keeping visibility choices and scoring configuration separate.

  • Plan an anonymous peer feedback process
  • Create a CSV template for feedback responses
  • Align feedback fields across SQL and JSON Schema
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by sickn33

Report a problem with this skill