Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

ai-security-hardening

Plan security controls for LLM applications and AI agents, covering malicious instructions, data leakage, model tampering, and API access. Includes guidance and code examples for filtering outputs, enforcing permissions, isolating networks, and recording audit events.

OriginalShow the original description

Harden AI/LLM deployments against prompt injection, data exfiltration, model theft, and supply chain attacks.

Works withKubernetes

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Reviewing defenses against prompt injection in AI agents
  • Filtering personal information from LLM responses
  • Designing authentication and rate limits for LLM APIs
  • Checking model provenance and network isolation

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md12.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

AI Security Hardening

Secure LLM and AI systems against prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, and supply chain threats in production environments.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Deploying an LLM-powered application handling sensitive user data
  • Protecting against prompt injection attacks in AI agents
  • Implementing output filtering and content moderation
  • Securing model weights and API endpoints from theft
  • Achieving SOC2 or ISO 27001 compliance for AI systems

AI-Specific Threat Model

Threat                    Risk                          Control
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Prompt injection          System prompt override         Input sanitization, separate context
Data exfiltration         PII in model outputs           Output filtering, DLP scanning
Jailbreaking             Policy bypass                  Content moderation, guardrails
Model theft               Weight extraction via API      Rate limiting, access controls
Training data poisoning   Backdoored fine-tuned model    Dataset validation, provenance
Supply chain attack       Malicious model weights        Signature verification, scanning
Insecure output           XSS/SQLi from LLM response     Output encoding, parameterized queries

Prompt-injection indicators and authorization boundaries

Regex indicators have false positives and bypasses. They do not establish a prompt-injection security boundary. Keep untrusted content separate, enforce server-side tool/data authorization independent of model text, minimize accessible secrets and require approval for scoped side effects. The examples below are illustrative detectors, not proof an input or output is safe.

import re
from typing import Optional

INJECTION_PATTERNS = [
    r"ignore\s+(all\s+)?(previous|prior|above)\s+instructions",
    r"you\s+are\s+now\s+",
    r"new\s+instructions?:",
    r"system\s+prompt",
    r"forget\s+everything",
    r"act\s+as\s+",
    r"jailbreak",
    r"dan\s+mode",
    r"<\s*system\s*>",
    r"\[INST\]",
]

def detect_prompt_injection(user_input: str) -> tuple[bool, Optional[str]]:
    """Return (is_suspicious, matched_pattern)."""
    normalized = user_input.lower().strip()
    for pattern in INJECTION_PATTERNS:
        if re.search(pattern, normalized, re.IGNORECASE):
            return True, pattern
    return False, None

def sanitize_user_input(user_input: str, max_length: int = 4000) -> str:
    """Sanitize input before passing to LLM."""
    # Truncate
    user_input = user_input[:max_length]

    # Remove null bytes and control characters
    user_input = re.sub(r'[\x00-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x7f]', '', user_input)

    # Check for injection
    suspicious, pattern = detect_prompt_injection(user_input)
    if suspicious:
        raise ValueError(f"Potential prompt injection detected: {pattern}")

    return user_input

Guardrails with NeMo Guardrails

# guardrails.yaml
from nemoguardrails import RailsConfig, LLMRails

config = RailsConfig.from_path("./guardrails-config")
rails = LLMRails(config)

async def safe_llm_call(user_message: str) -> str:
    response = await rails.generate_async(
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": user_message}]
    )
    return response["content"]
# guardrails-config/config.yml
models:
  - type: main
    engine: openai
    model: gpt-4o-mini

rails:
  input:
    flows:
      - check jailbreak
      - check sensitive data
  output:
    flows:
      - check output for PII
      - check output for harmful content

Output Filtering & PII Scrubbing

import re
from presidio_analyzer import AnalyzerEngine
from presidio_anonymizer import AnonymizerEngine

analyzer = AnalyzerEngine()
anonymizer = AnonymizerEngine()

PII_ENTITIES = ["PERSON", "EMAIL_ADDRESS", "PHONE_NUMBER", "CREDIT_CARD",
                "US_SSN", "IBAN_CODE", "IP_ADDRESS", "LOCATION"]

def scrub_pii_from_output(text: str) -> str:
    """Remove PII from LLM output before returning to user."""
    results = analyzer.analyze(text=text, entities=PII_ENTITIES, language="en")
    if not results:
        return text
    anonymized = anonymizer.anonymize(text=text, analyzer_results=results)
    return anonymized.text

def has_no_known_output_indicators(output: str) -> bool:
    """No known regex match; does not prove SQL, HTML or command safety."""
    dangerous_patterns = [
        r"<\s*script\s*>",         # XSS
        r"javascript:",             # XSS
        r";\s*(DROP|DELETE|INSERT)",# SQLi
        r"\$\{.*\}",               # template injection
        r"`.*`",                   # command injection in some contexts
    ]
    for pattern in dangerous_patterns:
        if re.search(pattern, output, re.IGNORECASE):
            return False
    return True

API Security for LLM Endpoints

Schematic example: bind SECRET_KEY, TOKEN_ISSUER and TOKEN_AUDIENCE to a verified trusted configuration. Require explicit scopes and tenant authorization before any model/tool call. The in-process rate map is not a distributed limiter; bound storage and use a shared limiter for multi-worker production. Validate the full request schema and size before indexing messages. Undefined project functions are prerequisites, not bundled implementations.

from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException, Depends, Request
from fastapi.security import HTTPBearer, HTTPAuthorizationCredentials
import jwt
import time
from collections import defaultdict

app = FastAPI()
security = HTTPBearer()

# Rate limiting (per API key)
request_counts = defaultdict(list)

def rate_limit(api_key: str, max_requests: int = 100, window_seconds: int = 60):
    now = time.time()
    requests = request_counts[api_key]
    # Remove old requests outside window
    request_counts[api_key] = [t for t in requests if now - t < window_seconds]
    if len(request_counts[api_key]) >= max_requests:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=429, detail="Rate limit exceeded")
    request_counts[api_key].append(now)

async def verify_token(
    credentials: HTTPAuthorizationCredentials = Depends(security)
) -> dict:
    try:
        payload = jwt.decode(
            credentials.credentials, SECRET_KEY, algorithms=["HS256"],
            issuer=TOKEN_ISSUER, audience=TOKEN_AUDIENCE,
            options={"require": ["exp", "iss", "aud", "sub"]},
        )
        if not isinstance(payload.get("sub"), str) or not payload["sub"]:
            raise jwt.InvalidTokenError("Invalid subject")
        rate_limit(payload["sub"])
        return payload
    except jwt.ExpiredSignatureError:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=401, detail="Token expired")
    except jwt.InvalidTokenError:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=401, detail="Invalid token")

@app.post("/v1/chat/completions")
async def chat(request: Request, token: dict = Depends(verify_token)):
    body = await request.json()

    # Input validation
    user_msg = body.get("messages", [{}])[-1].get("content", "")
    try:
        safe_input = sanitize_user_input(user_msg)
    except ValueError as e:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail=str(e))

    # Call LLM and scrub output
    response = await call_llm(safe_input, token["scope"])
    response["choices"][0]["message"]["content"] = scrub_pii_from_output(
        response["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]
    )
    return response

Model Weight Security

Verify the complete artifact inventory against a manifest signed by a trusted publisher: expected relative paths, per-file digest, model/revision identity, configuration and tokenizer assets. Reject traversal, links, extra/missing files and unsupported formats; compare exact bytes before loading. A hash computed from an untrusted download is not provenance. A local aggregate digest or scanner result alone cannot establish verified model identity. Prefer non-executable formats and an isolated loader; verify installed scanner/tool versions and obtain authorization before downloading weights or consuming paid compute.

Network Isolation for AI Services

# Kubernetes NetworkPolicy — isolate LLM API
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: llm-api-isolation
  namespace: ai-services
spec:
  podSelector:
    matchLabels:
      app: vllm
  policyTypes:
  - Ingress
  - Egress
  ingress:
  - from:
    - namespaceSelector:
        matchLabels:
          name: backend           # only backend can call LLM
    ports:
    - protocol: TCP
      port: 8000
  egress:
  - to:
    - namespaceSelector:
        matchLabels:
          name: monitoring        # metrics only
    ports:
    - protocol: TCP
      port: 9090
  # Block egress to internet — prevent data exfiltration
  # (allow only internal cluster traffic)

Audit Logging

import structlog
from datetime import datetime, timezone

audit_log = structlog.get_logger("ai.audit")

def log_llm_interaction(
    user_id: str,
    session_id: str,
    model: str,
    prompt_tokens: int,
    completion_tokens: int,
    was_filtered: bool,
    injection_detected: bool,
):
    audit_log.info(
        "llm_interaction",
        timestamp=datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
        user_id=user_id,
        session_id=session_id,
        model=model,
        prompt_tokens=prompt_tokens,
        completion_tokens=completion_tokens,
        was_filtered=was_filtered,
        injection_detected=injection_detected,
        # DO NOT log prompt/completion content — PII risk
    )

Common Issues

IssueCauseFix
False positive injection blocksOverly broad regexTune patterns; use ML-based classifier for high-traffic
PII in model outputsModel trained on PII dataAdd Presidio scrubbing to output layer
API key leakageKeys in logs or responsesMask keys in logging; use vault for key storage
Model weight tamperingUnverified downloadsVerify a trusted publisher manifest and full inventory; scanning is supplemental
Rate limit bypassPer-IP not per-userRate limit on authenticated user ID, not IP

Best Practices

  • Never log raw prompts or completions — they may contain PII or sensitive data.
  • Treat LLM output as untrusted input — always encode before rendering in HTML.
  • Use network policies to prevent LLM pods from making outbound internet calls.
  • Rotate API keys quarterly; use short-lived JWT tokens for service-to-service auth.
  • Run modelscan on any model downloaded from the internet before serving.

Related Skills

  • hashicorp-vault (hashicorp-vault) - Secrets management for API keys
  • network-security - Network-level controls (verify it is installed before use)
  • linux-hardening (linux-hardening) - Host hardening
  • agent-observability (agent-observability) - AI audit logging
  • llm-gateway (llm-gateway) - Centralized access control

Limitations

  • Apply guidance only within authorized scope; test destructive steps in non-production first.
  • Docs-only import: upstream scripts and templates not bundled.

Example

# Read-only first: inventory before any active step.
which <tool> && <tool> --help | head -n 20

Adapted from BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills (MIT); frontmatter, When to Use/Limitations, and safety boundaries added for upstream compliance. Docs-only import: helper scripts and templates not bundled.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Assess a new or existing AI project by examining its code, goals, and constraints. Recommend skills confirmed to exist in the available registry, then outline tasks and implementation phases with dependencies, completion criteria, and checks.

  • Planning the first steps of a new AI project
  • Assessing technical issues in an existing project
  • Selecting relevant skills from an available registry
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

007

FreeSummary

Review code and infrastructure for security risks, map potential threats, and plan stronger defenses. The skill covers OWASP checks, attack and defense exercises, and incident response, with validation required for each environment.

  • Reviewing code and infrastructure security
  • Mapping threats with STRIDE or PASTA
  • Planning stronger security settings
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Turn a repeatable task into an Andru.ia skill with clear inputs, outputs, examples, and limits. Draft SKILL.md, check the folder structure and required validations, and prepare a pull request describing the changes for review.

  • Creating a skill for a repeatable task
  • Improving an existing skill’s examples and limits
  • Validating skill files and preparing a pull request
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare an industry briefing once a project's sector is defined. It covers sector context, potentially applicable regulations, familiar interface patterns, technology choices, and risks, while separating verified evidence from hypotheses and questions requiring further review.

  • Researching industry requirements before product design
  • Checking regulations for a project's jurisdiction
  • Choosing interface patterns familiar to target users
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Create presentation drafts from text, outlines, or documents through the 2slides API. Match a reference image's style, choose themes, add AI voice narration, and export slide images or audio for review and use.

  • Create a presentation from text or an outline
  • Summarize a document into slides
  • Match slide styling to a reference image
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Plan a 360-degree or peer feedback process and create empty response templates from confirmed requirements. Produces consistent CSV, SQL, JSON Schema, or Notion property mappings while keeping visibility choices and scoring configuration separate.

  • Plan an anonymous peer feedback process
  • Create a CSV template for feedback responses
  • Align feedback fields across SQL and JSON Schema
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills48.4KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by sickn33

Report a problem with this skill