Sync tasks and refresh memory from your current activity. Use when pulling new assignments from your project tracker into TASKS.md, triaging stale or overdue tasks, filling memory gaps for unknown people or projects, or running a comprehensive scan to catch todos buried in chat and email.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Packaging adaptation by AutoGPT, 2026-09-25. Original authorship and licence are retained. Changes are limited to the recorded name, metadata and file references; see ATTRIBUTION.md in this skill package.
Package resources: The original companion guidance is bundled here: task-management, start. The dashboard source is assets/dashboard.html in this skill package. Native /productivity:start and /productivity:update command references remain unchanged; this package does not register those commands. All workflows must use the same persistent working directory for their task and memory state.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Keep your task list and memory current. Two modes:
--comprehensive: Deep scan chat, email, calendar, docs — flag missed todos and suggest new memories/productivity:update
/productivity:update --comprehensive
Read TASKS.md and memory/ directory. If they don't exist, suggest /productivity:start first.
Check for available task sources:
gh issue list --assignee=@meIf no sources are available, skip to Step 3.
Fetch tasks assigned to the user (open/in-progress). Compare against TASKS.md:
| External task | TASKS.md match? | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Found, not in TASKS.md | No match | Offer to add |
| Found, already in TASKS.md | Match by title (fuzzy) | Skip |
| In TASKS.md, not in external | No match | Flag as potentially stale |
| Completed externally | In Active section | Offer to mark done |
Present diff and let user decide what to add/complete.
Review Active tasks in TASKS.md and flag:
Present each for triage: Mark done? Reschedule? Move to Someday?
For each task, attempt to decode all entities (people, projects, acronyms, tools, links):
Task: "Send PSR to Todd re: Phoenix blockers"
Decode:
- PSR → ✓ Pipeline Status Report (in glossary)
- Todd → ✓ Todd Martinez (in people/)
- Phoenix → ? Not in memory
Track what's fully decoded vs. what has gaps.
Present unknown terms grouped:
I found terms in your tasks I don't have context for:
1. "Phoenix" (from: "Send PSR to Todd re: Phoenix blockers")
→ What's Phoenix?
2. "Maya" (from: "sync with Maya on API design")
→ Who is Maya?
Add answers to the appropriate memory files (people/, projects/, glossary.md).
Tasks often contain richer context than memory. Extract and update:
Update complete:
- Tasks: +3 from project tracker (e.g. Asana), 1 completed, 2 triaged
- Memory: 2 gaps filled, 1 project enriched
- All tasks decoded ✓
--comprehensive)Everything in Default Mode, plus a deep scan of recent activity.
Gather data from available MCP sources:
Compare activity against TASKS.md. Surface action items that aren't tracked:
## Possible Missing Tasks
From your activity, these look like todos you haven't captured:
1. From chat (Jan 18):
"I'll send the updated mockups by Friday"
→ Add to TASKS.md?
2. From meeting "Phoenix Standup" (Jan 17):
You have a recurring meeting but no Phoenix tasks active
→ Anything needed here?
3. From email (Jan 16):
"I'll review the API spec this week"
→ Add to TASKS.md?
Let user pick which to add.
Surface new entities not in memory:
## New People (not in memory)
| Name | Frequency | Context |
|------|-----------|---------|
| Maya Rodriguez | 12 mentions | design, UI reviews |
| Alex K | 8 mentions | DMs about API |
## New Projects/Topics
| Name | Frequency | Context |
|------|-----------|---------|
| Starlight | 15 mentions | planning docs, product |
## Suggested Cleanup
- **Horizon project** — No mentions in 30 days. Mark completed?
Present grouped by confidence. High-confidence items offered to add directly; low-confidence items asked about.
--comprehensive always runs interactivelyNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when a support account wobbles or a quarterly business review looms: read the health signals, run the success plan, and prep the review from evidence.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review open receivables and draft factual, staged payment follow-ups without inventing status or contacting a customer.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Write ad variants that each test one idea, within platform limits and supported claims.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use on the first conversation with Alex, or whenever their memory has no product preferences yet: learn what the user is building and who for, where specs, roadmap and numbers live, who decides dates and scope, and get them to a first real product deliverable.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a strategic alliance needs joint selling governance: operating model, joint targeting, steering prep, and milestone accountability.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.