codex
Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Files included (1)
- SKILL.md8.5 KB
SKILL.md (original)
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Codex Skill Guide
Running a Task
- For a new session (resumes inherit the prior model/effort — see step 5), ask the user (via
AskUserQuestion) which model AND which reasoning effort to use, in a single prompt with two questions. When the user expresses no preference, default togpt-6-astraathigh.- Model — default
gpt-6-astra:- GPT-6:
gpt-6-astra(frontier / most capable — default),gpt-6.1-sol(latest workhorse for coding and everyday work),gpt-6-sol(previous-generation workhorse),gpt-6-luna(fast & affordable, easier tasks) - GPT-5.6:
gpt-5.6-sol(reliable agentic workhorse),gpt-5.6-terra(balanced, everyday),gpt-5.6-luna(fast & affordable) - Legacy (rejected as unsupported when Codex is signed in with a ChatGPT account):
gpt-5.5,gpt-5.4,gpt-5.4-mini,gpt-5.3-codex-spark,gpt-5.3-codex
- GPT-6:
- Reasoning effort — default
high:low,medium,high,xhigh,max,ultra.max/ultrarequire a GPT-6 or GPT-5.6 model;ultrais only onastra/sol/terra(lunacaps atmax); legacy models cap atxhigh.ultra= maximum reasoning with automatic task delegation (slowest and most expensive — reserve for the hardest jobs).- If the chosen effort exceeds the chosen model's maximum, fall back to that model's highest supported effort and tell the user.
- Model — default
- Select the sandbox mode required for the task; default to
--sandbox read-onlyunless edits or network access are necessary. - Assemble the command with the appropriate options:
-m, --model <MODEL>--config model_reasoning_effort="<low|medium|high|xhigh|max|ultra>"(max/ultra only on GPT-6 / GPT-5.6 models; ultra only on astra/sol/terra — see step 1)--sandbox <read-only|workspace-write|danger-full-access>-C, --cd <DIR>--skip-git-repo-check(only when permitted by step 4)"your prompt here"(as final positional argument)
- Determine whether the effective target directory is inside a Git repository, including any explicit working directory such as
-C <DIR>.- Unknown Git context is unresolved, not consent; resolve it before invoking.
- Inside Git, omit
--skip-git-repo-checkby default; include it only for an applicable explicit request for that flag. - Outside Git, include it only with applicable approval or an explicit flag request. If permission is missing, ask using
AskUserQuestionand do not invoke until permission is given. - Applicable previous approval satisfies the gate; a later denial overrides any previous approval or request. A general request to use Codex or a sandbox mode is not skip-flag approval.
- If denied inside Git, omit the flag and continue only if the remaining task is authorized. If denied outside Git, stop and explain the blocked invocation.
- Do not use an unapproved retry, fallback, or Git initialization to bypass this gate.
- When continuing a previous session, use
codex exec resume --lastvia stdin. Resuming does not authorize--skip-git-repo-check; apply step 4 before each resume and add the flag only when permitted. When resuming don't use any configuration flags unless explicitly requested by the user e.g. if he species the model or the reasoning effort when requesting to resume a session. Resume syntax inside Git by default:echo "your prompt here" | codex exec resume --last 2>/dev/null. All flags have to be inserted between exec and resume. - IMPORTANT: By default, append
2>/dev/nullto allcodex execcommands to suppress thinking tokens (stderr). Only show stderr if the user explicitly requests to see thinking tokens or if debugging is needed. - IMPORTANT (stdin):
codex execalways reads stdin and concatenates it with the positional prompt -- even when the prompt is fully supplied as a positional argument. If stdin is not closed, codex blocks forever. When invoking from a harness (background tasks, hooks, scripts where stdin is not a TTY but also not closed), explicitly redirect stdin: append</dev/nullto the command, e.g.codex exec ... "prompt" </dev/null 2>/dev/null. Symptom of getting this wrong: zero bytes of stdout, zero CPU accumulated, process appears hung indefinitely. - Run the command, capture stdout/stderr (filtered as appropriate), and summarize the outcome for the user.
- After Codex completes, inform the user: "You can resume this Codex session at any time by saying 'codex resume' or asking me to continue with additional analysis or changes."
Quick Reference
| Use case | Sandbox mode | Key flags |
|---|---|---|
| Read-only review or analysis | read-only | --sandbox read-only 2>/dev/null |
| Apply local edits | workspace-write | --sandbox workspace-write 2>/dev/null |
| Permit network or broad access | danger-full-access | --sandbox danger-full-access 2>/dev/null |
| Resume recent session | Inherited from original | echo "prompt" | codex exec resume --last 2>/dev/null (inside Git by default; no configuration flags unless explicitly requested; apply step 4 to the skip flag) |
| Run from another directory | Match task needs | -C <DIR> plus other flags 2>/dev/null |
Execution timeouts
Codex produces no intermediate output — it writes the result only at completion. If the process is killed before finishing, the output file is silently empty (no error).
Preferred approach: run synchronously — eliminates timeout risk entirely and the conversation waits for the result anyway.
If running in background, set the execution timeout based on reasoning effort:
| Reasoning effort | Timeout |
|---|---|
low | 150s |
medium | 300s |
high | 600s |
xhigh | 1200s |
max | 1800s |
ultra | 1800s |
Following Up
- After every
codexcommand, immediately useAskUserQuestionto confirm next steps, collect clarifications, or decide whether to resume withcodex exec resume --last. - When resuming, apply step 4's skip-flag gate and pipe the new prompt via stdin:
echo "new prompt" | codex exec resume --last 2>/dev/null(inside Git by default). The resumed session automatically uses the same model, reasoning effort, and sandbox mode from the original session. - Restate the chosen model, reasoning effort, and sandbox mode when proposing follow-up actions.
Critical Evaluation of Codex Output
Codex is powered by OpenAI models with their own knowledge cutoffs and limitations. Treat Codex as a colleague, not an authority.
Guidelines
- Trust your own knowledge when confident. If Codex claims something you know is incorrect, push back directly.
- Research disagreements using WebSearch or documentation before accepting Codex's claims. Share findings with Codex via resume if needed.
- Remember knowledge cutoffs - Codex may not know about recent releases, APIs, or changes that occurred after its training data.
- Don't defer blindly - Codex can be wrong. Evaluate its suggestions critically, especially regarding:
- Model names and capabilities
- Recent library versions or API changes
- Best practices that may have evolved
When Codex is Wrong
- State your disagreement clearly to the user
- Provide evidence (your own knowledge, web search, docs)
- Optionally resume the Codex session to discuss the disagreement. Identify yourself as Claude so Codex knows it's a peer AI discussion. Use your actual model name (e.g., the model you are currently running as) instead of a hardcoded name:
echo "This is Claude (<your current model name>) following up. I disagree with [X] because [evidence]. What's your take on this?" | codex exec resume --last 2>/dev/null - Frame disagreements as discussions, not corrections - either AI could be wrong
- Let the user decide how to proceed if there's genuine ambiguity
Error Handling
- Stop and report failures whenever
codex --versionor acodex execcommand exits non-zero; request direction before retrying. - Before you use high-impact flags (
--sandbox danger-full-access,--skip-git-repo-check) ask the user for permission using AskUserQuestion unless it was already given. For--skip-git-repo-check, applicable previous approval or an explicit flag request satisfies this gate; apply step 4's Git-context and denial rules to executions and resumes. A later denial overrides previous approval or request. - When output includes warnings or partial results, summarize them and ask how to adjust using
AskUserQuestion.
Reviews
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
Comments
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.