Format CVs for academic positions with publications, grants, and teaching
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Final evidence, clarity, parsing, and defensibility gate for generated resumes. Produces a qualitative audit rather than arbitrary numeric quality scores.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Use this as the final quality gate before PDF delivery.
The resume should not be declared ready while a material issue remains unresolved. Do not convert editorial judgment into a universal score.
Check that the resume clearly and accurately shows relevant graduation timing, degree, location, availability, and other hard criteria when the job requires them.
Check standard section names, text-based PDF output, readable extraction order, and absence of unnecessary layout complexity.
Every substantive bullet must trace to one or more of:
Flag wording that exceeds evidence. Examples:
For every metric record:
If provenance is absent, remove the number or rewrite descriptively.
The resume should emphasize one role family. Remove low-value technologies and projects that dilute the target.
Check concise bullets, consistent tense, dates, section hierarchy, links, and enough whitespace for normal reading.
For every project/experience bullet, ask:
If the candidate could not answer from actual work, the bullet needs revision.
Linked repositories should visibly support project titles, current architecture, and stated technologies.
Compile/export the actual PDF and verify:
| Gate | Status | Evidence / issue | Required fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eligibility visibility | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Parsing safety | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Evidence coverage | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Truthfulness | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Metric provenance | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Role relevance | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Readability | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Interview defensibility | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Repository consistency | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
| Export validation | Pass / Needs revision | ... | ... |
A resume is ready only when no material "Needs revision" item remains.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Format CVs for academic positions with publications, grants, and teaching
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Decides whether to apply to a specific role, with what level of effort, and with which resume variant. Prevents wasted applications on roles with fundamentally poor fit and prioritizes high-probability opportunities.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Decide how to prioritize job applications using hard eligibility, evidence coverage, role alignment, and real application outcomes rather than arbitrary fit scores.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Define a clear primary role identity and supporting evidence so a resume reads coherently for the target job.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Determines the candidate's primary role identity before any JD analysis. Classifies into role families, selects core tech identity, ranks projects by role relevance, and outputs a Candidate Position Brief consumed by all downstream stages. This is Phase -1 of the pipeline.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Translate skills from one industry to another, identify transferable skills
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.