code-police
FreeReview code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration: understand the code, research what simple & elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI.
Run for 3 iterations (or as specified by the user — can be a number or a duration like 2h).
AskUserQuestion tool to ask: should this operate on the whole codebase or only on changes in the current branch/PR?git diff main...HEAD (or the appropriate base branch) to identify changed files and limit all subsequent steps to those files only.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Do a task end-to-end — implement, PR, CI loop, ship
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Avoids boring bullet lists; uses narrative paragraphs with bold/italic for emphasis.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.