Skeptical analysis and critique of claims, plans, and code without taking anyone at face value. Use when the user says "don't trust me", wants adversarial review, red-teaming, assumption checking, or verification that generated or proposed code is actually correct. Triggers on skepticism, critique everything, verify claims, challenge assumptions, red team, devil's advocate, prove it, smell test.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Resolve merge conflicts non-interactively, validate build and tests, and finalize conflict resolution

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Fetch and summarize review comments from the active pull request

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Can critique architecture. Use why for motivation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Implements a new planned feature

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Triggers on UI polish, design details, "make it feel better", "feels off", stagger animations, border radius, optical alignment, font smoothing, tabular numbers, image outlines, box shadows.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.