Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

benchmark-optimization-loop

Use when the user asks to make something faster, try many variants, run recursive optimization, benchmark latency/throughput/cost, or choose the best implementation by repeated measured tests.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Benchmark Optimization Loop

Use this skill to convert "make it 20x faster" or "try 50 recursive optimizations" into a bounded measured loop that can actually improve a system.

Required Baseline

Do not optimize until these exist:

  • the operation being optimized;
  • the correctness gate that must stay green;
  • the metric: wall time, p95 latency, rows/sec, cost/run, memory, error rate;
  • the current baseline;
  • the search budget: max variants, max time, max spend, max data impact.

If the user asks for an unrealistic target, keep the ambition but make the loop bounded and measurable.

Loop

  1. Measure the baseline.
  2. Identify bottlenecks from evidence.
  3. Generate variants that test one hypothesis each.
  4. Run variants with the same input shape.
  5. Reject variants that fail correctness, safety, or reproducibility.
  6. Promote the fastest safe variant.
  7. Codify the winning path in a script, command, test, config, or doc.
  8. Rerun the baseline and winner to confirm the delta.

Variant Table

Track variants like this:

Variant | Hypothesis | Command | Time | Correct? | Notes
baseline | current path | npm run job | 120s | yes | stable
batch-500 | fewer round trips | npm run job -- --batch 500 | 42s | yes | winner
parallel-8 | more workers | npm run job -- --workers 8 | 31s | no | rate limited

Recursive Search

For recursive or hyperparameter work:

  • persist every run to a ledger;
  • compare against the prior accepted winner, not only the previous run;
  • keep a holdout or replay check;
  • stop when improvement is within noise, correctness fails, cost exceeds the budget, or the search starts changing more variables than it can explain.

Use phrases like "best measured safe variant" instead of "global optimum" unless the search space was actually exhaustive.

Promotion Gate

A variant cannot become the new default until:

  • correctness tests pass;
  • the performance delta is repeated or explained;
  • rollback is obvious;
  • the change is encoded in source control or a durable runbook;
  • the final summary includes exact commands and measurements.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by tensology

Report a problem with this skill