Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

decisions-headroom

Use when a DecisionsAI, Codex, Cursor, or Claude task contains unusually large logs, files, JSON, search results, or tool output that should be compressed locally without losing access to the original.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

DecisionsAI Headroom

Headroom is bundled with DecisionsAI and its standalone MCP is enabled by default in DecisionsAI, Codex, and Cursor. The MCP keeps original content in a local store and does not require the provider traffic proxy. Use it when large context would otherwise crowd out the task instructions or implementation state.

Tools

  • headroom_compress: compress a large text payload locally and return a hash.
  • headroom_retrieve: recover the original by hash, optionally filtered by a query.
  • headroom_stats: inspect compression and retrieval savings.

DecisionsAI policy

  1. Keep automatic provider traffic proxying disabled. DecisionsAI callback blocks, work packets, acceptance criteria, and user instructions must never be compressed implicitly.
  2. Keep the standalone MCP registered and enabled. Its on-demand compression and retrieval use the MCP process's local store, with proxy access only as an optional fallback.
  3. Compress large logs, generated JSON, search results, or repeated tool output on demand. Do not compress short instructions or small source files.
  4. Preserve the returned hash in the active task or result packet when a later workflow step may need the original.
  5. Retrieve the original before quoting exact wording, line numbers, API values, or security-sensitive evidence.
  6. Treat compression as a context optimization, not verification. Tests and direct file inspection remain authoritative.

Recovery

  • If the Headroom MCP is unavailable, continue with normal local file reads and targeted searches. Do not block the task.
  • If an original has expired from Headroom's local store, read the source file or rerun the producing command instead of guessing.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 24, 2026

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 24, 2026

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 24, 2026

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 24, 2026

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 24, 2026

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 24, 2026

See all skills by tensology

Report a problem with this skill