Guide users through ECC's current agents, skills, commands, hooks, rules, install profiles, and project onboarding by reading the live repository surface before answering.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Use this skill when a user needs help understanding, navigating, installing, or choosing parts of Everything Claude Code.
Use this skill when the user:
Answer from current files, not memory. ECC changes quickly, so hard-coded catalog counts, feature lists, and install instructions go stale.
When the ECC repository is available, inspect the relevant files before giving a concrete answer:
node scripts/ci/catalog.js --json
find skills -maxdepth 2 -name SKILL.md | sort
find commands -maxdepth 1 -name '*.md' | sort
find agents -maxdepth 1 -name '*.md' | sort
node scripts/install-plan.js --list-profiles
node scripts/install-plan.js --list-components --json
Use the smallest set of reads needed for the user's question.
README.md: install paths, uninstall/reset guidance, public positioning, FAQsAGENTS.md: contributor guidance and project structureagent.yaml: exported gitagent surface and command listcommands/: maintained slash-command compatibility shimsskills/*/SKILL.md: reusable workflows and domain playbooksagents/*.md: delegated subagent role promptsrules/: language and harness ruleshooks/README.md, hooks/hooks.json, scripts/hooks/: hook behavior and safety gatesmanifests/install-*.json: selective install modules, components, profiles, and target supportdocs/: harness guides, architecture notes, translated docs, release docsLead with the answer, then give the next action. Most users do not need a full catalog dump.
Good first response shape:
Avoid:
Give a short menu:
Point to README.md for install/reset and /project-init for project-specific onboarding.
For "what should I use for X?":
skills/, commands/, and agents/.Useful searches:
rg -n "<query>" skills commands agents docs
find skills -maxdepth 2 -name SKILL.md | sort
Use managed install paths:
node scripts/install-plan.js --list-profiles
node scripts/install-plan.js --profile minimal --target claude --json
node scripts/install-apply.js --profile minimal --target claude --dry-run
For specific skill installs:
node scripts/install-plan.js --skills <skill-id> --target claude --json
node scripts/install-apply.js --skills <skill-id> --target claude --dry-run
Warn users not to stack plugin installs and full manual/profile installs unless they intentionally want duplicate surfaces.
Use /project-init when the user wants ECC configured for a target repo. The expected sequence is:
CLAUDE.md and settings filesAsk for the target harness and install path first, then inspect:
.claude/, .cursor/, .codex/, .gemini/, .opencode/, .codebuddy/, .joycode/, or .qwen/hooks/hooks.jsonFor repo health, suggest:
npm run harness:audit -- --format text
npm run observability:ready
npm test
Use <skill-or-command>. It fits because <reason>.
Canonical file: <path>
Verify with: <command>
Next: <one concrete action>
Best matches:
- <path>: <why it matters>
- <path>: <why it matters>
Recommendation: <which one to use first and why>
Detected: <stack evidence>
Target: <harness>
Plan: <profile/modules/skills>
Dry run: <command>
Would change: <paths>
Needs approval before apply: <yes/no>
/project-init: stack-aware onboarding plan for a target repo/harness-audit: deterministic readiness scorecard/skill-health: skill quality review/skill-create: generate a new skill from local git history/security-scan: inspect Claude/OpenCode configuration securityNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.