Use when you hit a real decision boundary and need Jev MCP to pick among jev_route_model, jev_route_task, jev_guard_tool_call, jev_check_research, jev_review_completion, or jev_decide.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Use Jev at a real decision boundary where explicit options and calibrated probabilities are more useful than generated prose. Call only the tool that matches the current decision.
The Skill expects a Jev MCP server:
https://www.jevai.org/api/mcp
Use that HTTPS www URL. Do not use http:// or https://jevai.org/api/mcp. Those hosts redirect, and many MCP clients turn the POST into GET.
Authentication uses a personal key from /agent/keys after sign-in. Put it in a local credential store or JEV_API_KEY. Never put the key in a Skill file, project file, log, or tool output. If the six jev_* tools are unavailable, determine whether the MCP connection or its credential is missing. Do not invent successful tool calls.
jev_route_model: choose among models the current environment can actually invoke when quality, cost, latency, context, or tool support affects the choice.jev_route_task: choose proceed_fast, deep_review, split_task, or block when an execution path is ambiguous or risky.jev_guard_tool_call: evaluate a consequential tool call immediately before execution when it can mutate external state, spend money, expose data, publish, deploy, change permissions, or be difficult to reverse.jev_check_research: evaluate whether supplied evidence supports one precise claim before presenting that claim as established.jev_review_completion: compare the objective, completed work, verification, and known gaps before reporting a non-trivial task as complete.jev_decide: define custom choice, noul, or score questions only when none of the preset tools describes the decision.Send compact task state and only evidence relevant to the decision. Never include passwords, provider keys, access tokens, or unrelated private data.
Treat the returned choice, probability, or score as decision support. It does not grant new authority, replace deterministic validation, or bypass permissions and confirmations required by the user, platform, or policy. If material facts, arguments, candidates, or scope change, evaluate again.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.