Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

ln-161-skill-creator

Creates .pi/skills from procedural doc sections with proper structure and transformation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • references/command_template.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

ln-161-skill-creator

Type: L3 Worker (standalone-capable) Category: 1XX Documentation Pipeline Coordinator: ln-160-docs-skill-extractor (optional)

Creates skill files from procedural documentation sections. Transforms declarative prose into imperative executable instructions.


Overview

AspectDetails
InputProcedural doc sections (from ln-160 contextStore or standalone scan)
Output.pi/skills/*.md files in target project
Templatereferences/command_template.md

Input Modes

ModeTriggerBehavior
WorkerInvoked by ln-160 with contextStoreUse provided sections directly
StandaloneInvoked directly with $ARGUMENTSSelf-discover + classify docs

Standalone Discovery

When invoked directly (not via ln-160):

  1. If $ARGUMENTS = file paths -> read those docs, extract procedural sections
  2. If $ARGUMENTS = "all" or empty -> scan docs/ recursively
  3. Classify sections using same rules as ln-160 Phase 2

MANDATORY READ: Load ../ln-160-docs-skill-extractor/references/classification_rules.md (standalone mode only)

  1. Present extraction plan to user via AskUserQuestion
  2. Create approved commands
  3. Recommend user to run ln-162-skill-reviewer for quality review

Workflow (Worker Mode)

Phase 1: Prepare

Receive contextStore with approved procedural sections:

approved_sections:
  - source_file: docs/project/runbook.md
    section_header: "Deployment"
    line_range: [45, 92]
    command_name: deploy.md
  - source_file: tests/README.md
    section_header: "Running Tests"
    line_range: [15, 48]
    command_name: run-tests.md

MANDATORY READ: Load references/command_template.md

Phase 2: Transform and Create

For each approved section:

  1. Read source -- extract section content from source file at specified line range

  2. Detect allowed-tools -- infer from content:

Content PatternTool
bash/sh code blocks, shell commandsBash
File read/load referencesRead
File modify/update instructionsEdit
Search/find in filesGrep, Glob
Skill invocationsSkill
User confirmation stepsAskUserQuestion
  1. Transform content using rules below

  2. Write file to .pi/skills/{command_name}

Transformation Rules

RuleFromTo
VoiceDeclarative ("The system uses X")Imperative ("Run X")
Code blocksPreserve as-isKeep unchanged
Numbered listsDescription-styleOrdered workflow steps with ### headers
VerificationImplicit ("should work")Explicit verification commands
Doc metadataSCOPE tags, Maintenance sectionsRemove
TroubleshootingProseTable format (Issue / Solution)
PrerequisitesMentioned inlineDedicated Prerequisites table
Related docsInline referencesRelated Documentation section with relative links

Phase 3: Report

Return to coordinator (or display to user in standalone mode):

created:
  - file: .pi/skills/deploy.md
    source: docs/project/runbook.md#Deployment
    lines: 85
    tools: [Bash, Read]
  - file: .pi/skills/run-tests.md
    source: tests/README.md#Running Tests
    lines: 62
    tools: [Bash]
summary: "Created 2 commands from 2 procedural sections"

Critical Rules

  • Template-driven: All output follows references/command_template.md structure
  • Preserve source: Never modify or delete source documentation files
  • No invention: Only extract content that exists in source docs. Do NOT add commands, steps, or paths not found in the original
  • Imperative voice: Every instruction must be actionable -- no passive descriptions
  • Relative paths: All file references in created commands use paths relative to project root
  • Idempotent: If command file already exists, skip (do not overwrite)

Definition of Done

  • Source sections read at specified line ranges
  • Allowed-tools detected per content patterns
  • Content transformed to imperative voice (all transformation rules applied)
  • Files written to .pi/skills/{command_name}
  • Existing command files not overwritten (idempotent)
  • Report returned with created file list and summary

Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-13

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tensology/decisionsai17Updated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by tensology

Report a problem with this skill