Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

aws-sam-local-testing

Wraps AWS SAM (Serverless Application Model) Local CLI for testing Lambda functions locally: `sam local invoke` (single invocation with event payload), `sam local start-api` (local API Gateway emulator), `sam local start-lambda` (local Lambda invoke endpoint for AWS SDK clients), and event-payload generation (`sam local generate-event`). For C#/.NET Lambdas, references/dotnet.md covers handler-direct testing with Amazon.Lambda.TestUtilities (TestLambdaContext, TestLambdaLogger) and the dotnet-lambda CLI. Use when testing Lambda + API Gateway + integrated AWS services locally.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13 stars(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
Works withAWSDocker

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json719 B
  • references/dotnet.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

aws-sam-local-testing

Overview

AWS SAM Local is the canonical local-testing toolchain for AWS Lambda. Per docs.aws.amazon.com/serverless-application-model, it runs Lambdas in Docker containers locally with images that mirror the Lambda runtime - same Linux, same Node/Python/Java binaries, same handler-invocation contract.

When to use

  • Local unit + integration tests for Lambda handlers.
  • Testing API Gateway + Lambda routing locally.
  • Reproducing prod Lambda behaviour without deploying.
  • Event-payload-driven tests (S3 event, SQS message, API GW request).

Authoring

Install

brew install aws-sam-cli
sam --version            # 1.x or higher
docker --version         # Required for sam local

Project structure

A SAM project has template.yaml declaring Lambda functions:

AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Transform: AWS::Serverless-2016-10-31

Resources:
  HelloFunction:
    Type: AWS::Serverless::Function
    Properties:
      CodeUri: src/
      Handler: app.handler
      Runtime: python3.12
      Timeout: 10
      MemorySize: 512
      Events:
        Api:
          Type: Api
          Properties:
            Path: /hello
            Method: GET

Generate an event payload

Per SAM docs:

sam local generate-event apigateway aws-proxy --path /hello --method GET > event.json
sam local generate-event s3 put --bucket mybucket --key file.txt > s3-event.json
sam local generate-event sqs receive-message > sqs-event.json

Single invocation

sam local invoke HelloFunction --event event.json

Output: handler's return value, plus the simulated Lambda runtime log lines.

Local API Gateway

sam local start-api --port 3000

Now curl http://localhost:3000/hello exercises the full API Gateway → Lambda routing.

Local Lambda invoke endpoint

sam local start-lambda --port 3001

Then point AWS SDK clients at http://localhost:3001:

import boto3
lambda_client = boto3.client('lambda', endpoint_url='http://localhost:3001', region_name='us-east-1')
lambda_client.invoke(FunctionName='HelloFunction', Payload=b'{}')

Useful for testing Lambda → Lambda invocations end-to-end.

.NET Lambdas - handler-direct testing

For C#/.NET Lambda handlers, prefer in-process handler-direct invocation with Amazon.Lambda.TestUtilities (TestLambdaContext, TestLambdaLogger) over per-test sam local invoke spawns - setup, worked tests, and the dotnet-lambda CLI are in references/dotnet.md.

Integration with pytest

import subprocess, json

def invoke_lambda(name, event):
    proc = subprocess.run(
        ["sam", "local", "invoke", name, "--event", "-"],
        input=json.dumps(event), text=True, capture_output=True,
    )
    return json.loads(proc.stdout)

def test_hello():
    result = invoke_lambda("HelloFunction", {"name": "world"})
    assert result["statusCode"] == 200
    assert "Hello, world" in result["body"]

Running

sam build                # Package Lambdas
sam local invoke HelloFunction --event event.json

For watch-mode:

sam build --use-container --watch

CI integration

jobs:
  sam-local-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: aws-actions/setup-sam@v2
      - run: sam build --use-container
      - run: pytest tests/lambda/

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Skip sam build between code changesStale package; old code runssam build (or watch mode)
sam local invoke for full-suiteSpawn cost per invocation; slowsam local start-lambda once, invoke many
Compare local timing to prodDocker overhead; cold-start model differs per cold-start-budget-referenceTest correctness locally; latency in prod
No event-payload generationHand-rolled events miss fieldssam local generate-event
Mock AWS SDK calls locallyTests pass but prod IAM / endpoints failUse LocalStack or test against real low-cost AWS account
Skip API Gateway routing testLambda alone passes; API GW integration breakssam local start-api
Hardcoded path in testOS-specificUse generated events

Limitations

  • Docker overhead. Cold starts in SAM Local are 5-15s (Docker container spin-up); not representative of prod cold-start budgets per cold-start-budget-reference.
  • Doesn't test IAM. Local invocations run with your AWS CLI credentials, not the Lambda's role.
  • Doesn't test event-source mapping. SQS / DynamoDB Streams / EventBridge bindings are SAM-template-only locally.
  • VPC + private endpoints can't be simulated. Local Lambdas reach internet directly.
  • Pair with LocalStack for fuller AWS-service emulation (localstack.cloud).

References

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by testland

Report a problem with this skill