Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

cloudflare-workers-miniflare

Wraps Miniflare 3 (the official Cloudflare Workers simulator) and Wrangler dev for testing Workers locally. Covers Miniflare's getMiniflare() programmatic API (workerd-backed simulation matching prod), the wrangler dev local-mode (live-reload during dev), KV / Durable Objects / R2 / D1 bindings emulation, and Vitest + @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers for in-process tests. Use when testing Cloudflare Workers code locally.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13 stars(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
Works withCloudflare

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json567 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

cloudflare-workers-miniflare

Overview

Miniflare 3 is the official Workers simulator. Per developers.cloudflare.com/workers, Miniflare 3 is built on top of workerd - the same runtime that serves production Workers traffic. This means local-mode behaviour matches prod with very high fidelity.

Three integration patterns:

  1. wrangler dev (CLI; live-reload during dev).
  2. Programmatic Miniflare (getMiniflare(); for integration tests).
  3. @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers (Vitest + in-process Workers; the recommended unit-test path).

When to use

  • Unit / integration tests for Cloudflare Workers code.
  • Tests for KV / Durable Objects / R2 / D1 bindings.
  • Local-development of Workers without deploying.

Authoring

Install

npm install --save-dev wrangler miniflare @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers vitest

wrangler dev (CLI)

wrangler dev --local        # workerd locally; no remote calls
wrangler dev                # default = local-mode in Wrangler 3+

Now curl http://localhost:8787 hits the local Worker.

Programmatic Miniflare

Per miniflare.dev:

import { Miniflare } from 'miniflare';

const mf = new Miniflare({
  scriptPath: './src/worker.js',
  modules: true,
  kvNamespaces: ['MY_KV'],
  d1Databases: ['DB'],
  r2Buckets: ['MY_BUCKET'],
  durableObjects: {
    COUNTER: 'Counter',
  },
});

const res = await mf.dispatchFetch('https://example.com/');
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(await res.text()).toBe('Hello');

await mf.dispose();

@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers (recommended for unit tests)

Per developers.cloudflare.com/workers/testing/vitest-integration:

// vitest.config.ts
import { defineWorkersConfig } from '@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers/config';

export default defineWorkersConfig({
  test: {
    poolOptions: {
      workers: {
        wrangler: { configPath: './wrangler.toml' },
      },
    },
  },
});

// src/worker.test.ts
import { env, SELF } from 'cloudflare:test';
import { expect, test } from 'vitest';

test('responds with hello', async () => {
  const response = await SELF.fetch('https://example.com/');
  expect(await response.text()).toBe('Hello');
});

test('writes to KV', async () => {
  await env.MY_KV.put('key', 'value');
  expect(await env.MY_KV.get('key')).toBe('value');
});

This is the lowest-overhead test path - runs inside workerd.

Durable Objects testing

import { env } from 'cloudflare:test';

test('counter increments', async () => {
  const id = env.COUNTER.idFromName('test');
  const stub = env.COUNTER.get(id);
  const r1 = await stub.fetch('https://example.com/increment');
  expect(await r1.text()).toBe('1');
  const r2 = await stub.fetch('https://example.com/increment');
  expect(await r2.text()).toBe('2');
});

Per Cloudflare docs, the vitest-pool-workers env exposes the Durable Object namespace exactly as in production.

D1 testing

import { env } from 'cloudflare:test';

test('d1 query', async () => {
  await env.DB.exec('CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS users (id INT, name TEXT)');
  await env.DB.prepare('INSERT INTO users VALUES (?, ?)').bind(1, 'alice').run();
  const { results } = await env.DB.prepare('SELECT * FROM users').all();
  expect(results).toEqual([{ id: 1, name: 'alice' }]);
});

Running

npx vitest run                # @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers
wrangler dev                  # CLI dev

CI integration

jobs:
  workers-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npx vitest run

No CF account/API key needed - vitest-pool-workers runs locally via workerd.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Test against deployed WorkerSlow; flaky; rate-limitedUse vitest-pool-workers
Mock the fetch APILoses Workers' standard-Web-Platform shapeUse real Worker isolation
Skip Durable Object testsFan-out + consistency bugs hideTest DO classes directly
KV getWithMetadata not tested for stale-read behaviorKV is eventually consistentTest the consistency requirements
Local-mode time differs from prodCron / scheduled triggers won't fireTest via deployed Worker + Cloudflare Cron Trigger
Hardcoded API key in workerExposed in source map / fetchUse Workers Secrets (wrangler secret)
No assertion on response headersCache-Control / CORS bugsInspect response.headers
Cold-start tests against local WorkerLocal cold start ~0ms; not representativePer cold-start-budget-reference, test cold-start budget on deployed Worker

Limitations

  • Workerd local-mode mirrors prod with ~95% fidelity. Edge- cases around network egress, KV durability, R2 ranges may differ. Test against staging for high-fidelity.
  • No production analytics in local-mode. Workers Analytics Engine writes are no-ops locally.
  • Bindings to remote services (e.g., remote KV from a different account) need explicit remote: true config in Wrangler 3.
  • Cron Triggers don't fire locally. Schedule events need manual dispatchFetch('https://example.com/__scheduled').
  • WebSocket Hibernation (Durable Objects) has subtleties in local mode; verify against deployed.

References

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by testland

Report a problem with this skill