Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

lizard-complexity

Run Lizard against production source to enforce per-function cyclomatic complexity (CCN), NLOC, and parameter-count thresholds - language-agnostic (30+ languages). Scoped to production code via `-x"./tests/*"`; test complexity is reviewed separately. Use when a codebase spans several languages and needs one complexity gate across all of them, or when a function has grown unreviewable and the team wants a numeric threshold in CI.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13 stars(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json567 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

lizard-complexity

Lizard analyzes source code per function for NLOC (non-comment LoC), CCN (cyclomatic complexity), token count, and parameter count across 30+ languages including C/C++, Java, Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, TypeScript, Swift, Kotlin (per the Lizard README). Default CCN warning threshold is 15.

When to use

  • Polyglot codebase where per-language linters give inconsistent complexity metrics.
  • Adding a CCN ceiling to CI without buying a commercial scanner.
  • One-off audit of "where is the most complex code?" before a refactor.

Step 1 - Install

pip install lizard

Or run the standalone script:

python lizard.py path/to/code

Per the Lizard README, no external deps required.

Step 2 - Baseline scan

lizard src/

Default output groups by file with per-function NLOC/CCN/token/param counts. Default warning threshold: CCN ≥ 15.

Step 3 - Set production-only thresholds

lizard src/ \
  -x"./tests/*" \
  -x"./vendor/*" \
  -C 10 \
  -L 100 \
  -a 5
FlagMeaning
-x PATTERNExclude (must include tests/** for production-only scope)
-C NCCN warning threshold (default 15; tighten to 10 for new codebases)
-L NMax function NLOC (default 1000; tighten to 80 - 100)
-a NMax parameter count (5 = "if you need more, pass an object")

Step 4 - CSV/XML for CI

# CSV for grep / jq pipelines
lizard src/ -x"./tests/*" -C 10 --csv > lizard.csv

# XML for CI parsers (cppncss-style)
lizard src/ -x"./tests/*" -C 10 -X > lizard.xml

# HTML for human review
lizard src/ -x"./tests/*" -C 10 -H > lizard.html

Step 5 - Fail CI on warnings

lizard src/ -x"./tests/*" -C 10 -L 100 -a 5 -w
EXIT=$?
if [ "$EXIT" -ne 0 ]; then
  echo "Complexity threshold breached. See report."
  exit 1
fi

-w prints warnings only (clang/gcc style). Lizard exits non-zero when any function exceeds the configured threshold.

Step 6 - Per-language scope

# Only Python
lizard src/ -l python -C 10

# Only TypeScript + JS
lizard src/ -l typescript -l javascript -C 10

Useful when a polyglot repo has language-specific budgets (e.g., Python tolerates higher CCN than C).

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Run on whole repo including testsTest setup helpers ("create user with 12 fields") look complex; tests get refactored away from clarityAlways exclude tests/, spec/ (Step 3)
Set CCN threshold to default (15)Too lax for new codeStart at 10 for new code; track existing code as baseline
Block PRs on absolute countLegacy code can't add a single lineDiff-only: scan PR-changed functions only with git diff --name-only filter
Refactor for CCN at expense of claritySplitting a clear linear function into 4 helpers raises overall complexityUse CCN as a smell signal, not a hard rule
Skip parameter-count guard"God functions" with 12 args slip through-a 5 enforces object-arg style

Limitations

  • Lizard's CCN counts decision points (if/else/case/&&/||/?:); doesn't reflect cognitive complexity (nesting depth weight). Use SonarQube / sonarqube-maintainability-gate for cognitive complexity if needed.
  • No per-class metrics for OO code beyond per-method.

References

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by testland

Report a problem with this skill