Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

reqnroll-testing

Configures Reqnroll (the canonical .NET BDD framework) - install via `dotnet add package Reqnroll`, author `.feature` files in Gherkin, write step bindings as `[Given/When/Then]`-decorated methods in any C# class, runs via `dotnet test`. Reqnroll is the SpecFlow successor (SpecFlow reached end-of-life 2024-12-31); covers the SpecFlow-to-Reqnroll migration path, and references/specflow-legacy.md maintains not-yet-migrated SpecFlow projects. Use for .NET projects starting BDD, migrating from SpecFlow, or maintaining legacy SpecFlow suites.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13 stars(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json675 B
  • references/bindings-and-hooks.md2.5 KB
  • references/specflow-legacy.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

reqnroll-testing

Overview

Per reqnroll-home:

"Reqnroll is described as 'an open-source Cucumber-style BDD test automation framework for .NET. It has been created as a reboot of the SpecFlow project.'"

The "reboot" framing is the key: SpecFlow's maintenance slowed in 2023; the community forked into Reqnroll, which has continued active development.

When to use

  • A new .NET project starts BDD - pick Reqnroll over SpecFlow.
  • An existing SpecFlow project plans to migrate (SpecFlow-compatible; see Step 9).
  • The team needs full Gherkin support including Rule blocks (per reqnroll-home: "Full Gherkin support with tagged Rule blocks").

For SpecFlow-locked legacy projects mid-migration (packages, bindings, EOL background), see references/specflow-legacy.md.

Worked example

A checkout team adds one BDD scenario, "Apply valid promo," to a new xUnit project.

  1. dotnet add package Reqnroll.xUnit and dotnet add package Reqnroll.Tools.MsBuild.Generation.
  2. Features/Cart.feature declares the scenario under Rule: Promo codes apply only when valid, with When I enter "WELCOME10" in the promo input / Then the subtotal updates to $22.49.
  3. Steps/CartSteps.cs binds each line - [When(@"I enter ""([^""]*)"" in the promo input")] calls _page.EnterPromoAsync(code), and the Then asserts Assert.Equal(22.49m, _page.GetSubtotal(), 2).
  4. dotnet test --filter "FullyQualifiedName~Cart" runs only that feature.
  5. Result: the scenario turns green, and the MSBuild generator has produced the runnable test class from the .feature file - no glue code beyond the bindings.

Step 1 - Install

# In the test project directory
dotnet add package Reqnroll.xUnit                    # or Reqnroll.NUnit / Reqnroll.MsTest
dotnet add package Reqnroll.Tools.MsBuild.Generation  # generates code from .feature files

Per reqnroll-home: "Works across common operating systems and .NET versions (including .NET 8.0)."

Verify: dotnet build succeeds and restores both packages before you author features. If code generation does not run, confirm Reqnroll.Tools.MsBuild.Generation is referenced in the test project.

Step 2 - Author a Feature

# Features/Cart.feature
Feature: Apply promo code at checkout

  Background:
    Given a logged-in user with email confirmed
    And the cart contains 1 of "BOOK-001" at $24.99

  Rule: Promo codes apply only when valid

    Scenario: Apply valid promo
      When I enter "WELCOME10" in the promo input
      And I click "Apply"
      Then the subtotal updates to $22.49

    Scenario Outline: Reject invalid codes
      When I enter "<code>" in the promo input
      And I click "Apply"
      Then an error appears: "<error>"

      Examples:
        | code       | error                 |
        | EXPIRED50  | This code has expired |
        | NOTREAL    | Code not found        |

Rule: blocks (Gherkin 6+) group related scenarios; per reqnroll-home this is supported.

Step 3 - Step bindings

Write step bindings as [Given/When/Then]-decorated methods in a [Binding] class. Per reqnroll-home: "Supports flexible step definitions using regex or cucumber expressions" - regex is more flexible, cucumber expressions ({int}, {string}, {double}) more readable. Full CartSteps binding class and the cucumber-expression variant: references/bindings-and-hooks.md.

Step 4 - Async support

Per reqnroll-home: "Async step definitions and hooks."

[Then("the order arrives within (\\d+) minutes")]
public async Task ThenOrderArrives(int minutes)
{
    await EmailInbox.WaitForOrderConfirmation(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(minutes));
}

async Task step methods work transparently; no special config.

Step 5 - Hooks

Use [BeforeTestRun], [BeforeScenario] / [AfterScenario], and tag-scoped hooks (e.g. [BeforeScenario("@browser")]) for setup and teardown; wrap each scenario in a transaction and roll back in [AfterScenario] so state does not leak between scenarios. Full hook class: references/bindings-and-hooks.md.

Step 6 - Tags

@critical @regression
Scenario: Apply valid promo
  ...

@browser @wip
Scenario: New checkout flow
  ...
dotnet test --filter "Category=critical"
dotnet test --filter "Category!=wip"

Step 7 - Run

# All tests
dotnet test

# Specific feature
dotnet test --filter "FullyQualifiedName~Cart"

# Generate JUnit XML for CI
dotnet test --logger "junit;LogFilePath=reports/test-results.xml"

If a scenario fails or reports an undefined step, fix the matching binding in the [Binding] class and re-run until it turns green.

Step 8 - IDE support

Per reqnroll-home: "IDE support for Visual Studio 2022, VS Code, and Rider."

The Reqnroll plugin enables:

  • Step navigation (Gherkin → step binding).
  • Scaffolding (auto-generate step from undefined Gherkin line).
  • Run/debug per-scenario.

Step 9 - Migrate from SpecFlow

Per reqnroll-home: "Compatible with SpecFlow, allowing quick migration of existing projects."

Migration path:

  1. Replace SpecFlow.* NuGet packages with Reqnroll.* equivalents.
  2. Update using SpecFlow → using Reqnroll (single find/replace).
  3. Update [Binding] (compatible) and step decorators (mostly compatible).
  4. Run tests; fix any compatibility issues.

Most SpecFlow projects migrate in <1 day for typical scope.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Starting new .NET BDD with SpecFlow in 2026+SpecFlow's maintenance has slowed; Reqnroll is the active fork.Pick Reqnroll (Step 1).
Mixing SpecFlow + Reqnroll in one solutionTwo BDD runners; double maintenance.Migrate everything (Step 9).
Regex-only steps when cucumber expressions would workLess readable; harder to maintain.Cucumber expressions for typical cases (Step 3).
No [BeforeScenario] cleanupState leaks between scenarios.Per-scenario hook + transaction rollback (Step 5).
Sync step methods that block on asyncDeadlocks in xUnit / NUnit / MsTest.async Task step methods (Step 4).

Limitations

  • Newer than SpecFlow. Some third-party SpecFlow plugins haven't been ported yet.
  • Per-test-framework variant. xUnit / NUnit / MsTest each have their own Reqnroll package; pin matching versions.
  • Gherkin parser quirks. Some edge cases differ between Reqnroll and Cucumber-JVM; cross-port scenarios need verification.

References

  • rh - Reqnroll overview: SpecFlow reboot, Gherkin Rule blocks, SpecFlow-compatible migration, async hooks, IDE support (VS / VS Code / Rider).
  • references/bindings-and-hooks.md - full step-binding class, cucumber-expression variant, and hook class.
  • references/specflow-legacy.md - legacy SpecFlow support + EOL background + full migration path.
  • cucumber-testing, behave-testing - sibling language wrappers.
  • bdd-step-library-curator - addresses step proliferation.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by testland

Report a problem with this skill