Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

varnish-test-vtc-syntax

Wraps the varnishtest CLI + VTC (Varnish Test Case) syntax for testing VCL configurations. Covers the VTC test-file format (varnishtest scripts with server { ... } + client { ... } + varnish v1 -vcl+backend { ... } blocks), the grace-mode + saint-mode behaviours (stale-while-revalidate + stale-if-error equivalents in VCL), the PURGE method handler pattern (vcl_purge subroutine + ACL guards), and surrogate-key invalidation via xkey vmod. Use when authoring or testing Varnish-based caching layers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13 stars(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json639 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

varnish-test-vtc-syntax

Overview

varnishtest (CLI) executes .vtc (Varnish Test Case) files that spin up a Varnish instance + a mock backend + a mock client in-process. Per varnish-cache.org/docs, VTC is the canonical way to test VCL - Varnish's configuration language - without a real network.

When to use

  • Authoring or modifying VCL.
  • Testing PURGE handlers, grace/saint mode, surrogate-key logic.
  • Regression-testing VCL after Varnish version bump.
  • CI gate before a VCL deploy.

Authoring

Install

Varnish ships varnishtest in the standard distribution:

apt install varnish        # Debian/Ubuntu
brew install varnish       # macOS
varnishtest -v             # verify

Anatomy of a VTC

varnishtest "basic cache hit test"

server s1 {
  rxreq
  txresp -hdr "Cache-Control: max-age=60" -body "hello"
} -start

varnish v1 -vcl+backend {
  // VCL goes here
} -start

client c1 {
  txreq -url "/"
  rxresp
  expect resp.status == 200
  expect resp.body == "hello"

  txreq -url "/"
  rxresp
  expect resp.http.x-cache == "HIT"   // assumes vcl_deliver sets this
} -run

varnish v1 -expect cache_hit == 1

Per Varnish docs, the VTC file has four block types:

BlockPurpose
server sNMock origin
varnish vNVarnish instance with VCL
client cNSend requests, assert responses
barrier, delay, shellSynchronisation + setup

Testing PURGE

The canonical pattern from Varnish docs:

acl purge {
  "localhost";
  "10.0.0.0"/8;
}

sub vcl_recv {
  if (req.method == "PURGE") {
    if (!client.ip ~ purge) {
      return (synth(403, "Not allowed"));
    }
    return (purge);
  }
}

sub vcl_purge {
  return (synth(200, "Purged"));
}

The VTC:

client c1 {
  txreq -url "/foo"           // populate cache
  rxresp
  expect resp.status == 200

  txreq -url "/foo" -method "PURGE"
  rxresp
  expect resp.status == 200

  // Next request should hit origin again
  txreq -url "/foo"
  rxresp
  expect resp.http.x-cache == "MISS"
} -run

Grace mode (stale-while-revalidate equivalent)

Per Varnish docs and per cache-coherence-patterns-reference references/stale-while-revalidate.md:

sub vcl_backend_response {
  set beresp.grace = 1h;       // serve stale for 1h while async-refreshing
}

sub vcl_deliver {
  if (obj.ttl < 0s) {
    set resp.http.x-cache = "GRACE";
  } else if (obj.hits == 0) {
    set resp.http.x-cache = "MISS";
  } else {
    set resp.http.x-cache = "HIT";
  }
}

VTC for grace mode:

varnishtest "grace serves stale while refreshing"

server s1 {
  rxreq
  txresp -hdr "Cache-Control: max-age=1"

  rxreq
  delay 2                        // simulate slow refresh
  txresp -hdr "Cache-Control: max-age=1"
} -start

varnish v1 -vcl+backend {
  sub vcl_backend_response {
    set beresp.grace = 60s;
  }
} -start

client c1 {
  txreq -url "/"
  rxresp
  expect resp.status == 200

  delay 1.5                      // past TTL

  txreq -url "/"
  rxresp
  expect resp.status == 200
  expect resp.http.x-cache == "GRACE"
} -run

Surrogate-key (xkey vmod)

import xkey;

sub vcl_backend_response {
  set beresp.http.xkey = "user-1 posts-feed";   // tag the object
}

sub vcl_recv {
  if (req.method == "PURGE" && req.http.xkey-purge) {
    set req.http.X-Purges = xkey.softpurge(req.http.xkey-purge);
    return (synth(200));
  }
}

Running

varnishtest -v cache-tests.vtc
# Or: varnishtest -v tests/*.vtc

# Verbose with full Varnish log output:
varnishtest -vvv cache-tests.vtc

Exit code 0 = pass; non-zero = fail.

Parallel runs

varnishtest -j 4 tests/*.vtc

Each VTC runs in an isolated Varnish instance; parallel-safe.

Parsing results

varnishtest output:

**** v1   vsl:  0     SLT_End
**** v1   vsl_dispatch_complete
*    top  TEST cache-tests.vtc passed (1.34)

passed or FAILED. The failure output shows the failing expect line and the actual value.

For CI: parse passed / FAILED count in the summary.

CI integration

jobs:
  vcl-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    container: varnish:7
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - name: Run VCL tests
        run: varnishtest -v tests/vcl/*.vtc

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Testing VCL by hitting a real Varnish in devSlow; environment-dependentUse varnishtest - in-process
delay 60 for TTL testTests slow; flakySet short TTL (max-age=1, delay 1.5)
Missing -expect cache_hit == NPass relies on observer-affects-systemAlways assert cache counters
Untested PURGE ACLOpen PURGE = cache-flush DoSTest 403 from external IP
No grace-mode testProduction grace surprisesVerify x-cache GRACE on stale fetch
One mega-VTCFailures opaqueOne concern per file
Skip varnishlog inspectionHard to debug failuresUse -vvv in CI for failure logs
Hand-roll surrogate-key without xkey vmodManual ban-list grows; slow regex matchesUse xkey vmod

Limitations

  • VTC is Varnish-specific. Doesn't transfer to nginx / Apache cache testing.
  • Mock client/server is in-process. Doesn't catch network- layer issues (TLS handshake, slow-client, hostname resolution).
  • xkey vmod requires Varnish Plus or self-compile. Open-source Varnish has purge.soft but not surrogate keys natively.
  • Doesn't test CDN-edge behaviour. Varnish is one tier; full multi-tier tests need cdn-cache-purge-tests patterns.

References

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

testland/qa13Updated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by testland

Report a problem with this skill