Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

no-explicit-any

Find TypeScript values that bypass type checking through any, including inferred types and assertions. Suggest unknown, generics that preserve type relationships, or Zod validation for external data, with the checks needed where each value is used.

OriginalShow the original description

Use when reviewing TypeScript files for type safety regressions, during code review of functions that handle external data, or when the codebase has ESLint warnings for @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any.

See how to install

Good for

  • Addressing ESLint warnings about explicit any
  • Reviewing type safety around external API data
  • Checking functions that pass any to their callers

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB
  • references/rule.md6.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Avoid the any type — use unknown, generics, or type guards instead

The any type is a local opt-out that becomes a global problem: a function returning any propagates unchecked types to every caller, silently undermining the type system across the entire codebase. Replacing any with unknown forces type narrowing at the point of use, turning latent runtime errors into compile-time failures where they are cheapest to fix.

Quick Reference

  • any disables all type checking for a value and cascades to callers
  • unknown is the safe alternative — it requires a type check before use
  • Use generics to express "I accept any type, but it stays consistent"
  • At API boundaries, validate with Zod rather than asserting with as Type

Check

Scan this TypeScript file for uses of the any type (explicit annotations, implicit any from missing types, and type assertions to any). Report each location and suggest a safer alternative.

Fix

Replace the any types in this code with unknown (for values of unknown shape), appropriate generics (for type-consistent operations), or Zod validation (for external data). Show the narrowing or generic constraint needed at each usage site.

Explain

Explain why the any type undermines TypeScript's guarantees, how unknown differs from any, and when a type assertion (as Type) is acceptable versus dangerous.

Code Review

Review all type annotations, function signatures, and external data handling in this file. Flag every explicit or implicit any, any type assertion that lacks a preceding type guard, and any return types inferred as any from untyped dependencies.


For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md.

Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/javascript/no-explicit-any

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

404-page

FreeSummary

Create and review custom 404 pages that help visitors recover from broken or moved links through search and navigation. Check the rendered page and HTTP response so missing content returns a proper 404 status.

  • Creating a helpful custom 404 page
  • Adding search and navigation for broken links
  • Checking missing pages that return HTTP 200
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74.5KUpdated Oct 6, 2026

about-page

FreeSummary

Audit or create a dedicated About page that explains a website’s purpose and identifies its people or organization. Review the rendered output and supporting information, including expertise and contact details, to find gaps.

  • Reviewing a website’s About page
  • Creating a page about the organization and its mission
  • Checking how operator information appears in rendered output
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74.5KUpdated Oct 6, 2026

Review and add automated accessibility checks for components, pages, and continuous integration workflows. Use axe-based tools to detect structural and attribute issues, while identifying checks that still need keyboard or screen reader testing.

  • Review accessibility coverage for shared components
  • Add accessibility checks to page flow tests
  • Run accessibility tests in CI
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74.5KUpdated Oct 6, 2026

Review sign-in, registration, multi-factor authentication, and account recovery for accessibility barriers. Find blocked paste, difficult code entry, and inaccessible backup methods, then suggest authentication paths that support password managers, autofill, or device approval.

  • Reviewing accessibility across the sign-in process
  • Checking verification code paste and autofill
  • Inspecting password reset and account recovery
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74.5KUpdated Oct 6, 2026

Review form errors, success messages, and live updates so screen reader users receive important notifications. Check the HTML delivered to the browser, announcement settings, display duration, and dismissal controls, then identify specific elements that need changes.

  • Reviewing form error announcements
  • Checking success message display duration
  • Auditing live update notifications
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74.5KUpdated Oct 6, 2026

Review HTML tables so screen reader users can understand how headers and data relate. Check header markup, table descriptions, and merged cells, then identify specific fixes and ways to verify them.

  • Reviewing tables for screen reader accessibility
  • Checking header relationships in tables with merged cells
  • Reviewing table patterns in a design system
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74.5KUpdated Oct 6, 2026

See all skills by thedaviddias

Report a problem with this skill