Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

ticket-system

Ticket system and work logs for context anchoring. Use when creating tickets, managing work logs, or anchoring context across multi-step tasks or sessions. Do NOT use for simple patches or single-step tasks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Ticket System

Purpose: Context anchor to prevent LLM loops during complex work. Colocates all artifacts.

Creating a ticket: Run safeword ticket new <slug> (optionally with --type=patch|task|feature and --title="..."). The CLI mints a 6-char Crockford Base32 ID, creates the folder atomically, and writes a starter ticket.md. Do not scan the tickets directory and pick the next ID yourself — that races between parallel sessions and silently collides across git branches.

Location: .safeword-project/tickets/{ID}/ for new tickets (folder name is the ID alone; slug lives in frontmatter). Pre-existing tickets keep their legacy {numeric-id}-{slug}/ layout and remain reachable by ID — both formats are supported forever.

Folder structure:

.safeword-project/
├── tickets/
│   ├── 7K9M3P/                 # New format: folder = Crockford ID, slug in frontmatter
│   │   ├── ticket.md           # Ticket definition (frontmatter + work log)
│   │   ├── test-definitions.md # BDD scenarios (Given/When/Then)
│   │   ├── spec.md             # Feature spec for epics (optional)
│   │   └── design.md           # Design doc for complex features (optional)
│   ├── 080-ticket-id-collision/  # Legacy format: kept readable, never created new
│   │   └── ticket.md
│   └── completed/              # Archive for done tickets
├── learnings/                  # Extracted knowledge (gotchas, discoveries)
└── tmp/                        # Scratch space (research, logs, etc.)

Artifact Levels:

LevelArtifacts
featureticket.md + test-definitions.md (+ spec.md if epic)
taskticket.md with inline tests
patchticket.md (minimal), existing tests

Create ticket? Answer IN ORDER, stop at first match:

  1. Multiple attempts likely needed? → Create ticket
  2. Multi-step with dependencies? → Create ticket
  3. Investigation/debugging required? → Create ticket
  4. Risk of losing context mid-session? → Create ticket
  5. None of above? → Skip ticket

Examples: "Fix typo" → skip. "Debug slow login" → ticket. "Add OAuth" → ticket.

Minimal structure:

---
id: 7K9M3P
slug: feature-name
status: in_progress
---

# [Title]

**Goal:** [one sentence]

## Work Log

- [timestamp] Started: [task]
- [timestamp] Found: [finding]
- [timestamp] Complete: [result]

Frontmatter values (enum — do not invent new keys or values):

  • status: in_progress | done | cancelled | superseded | wontfix | blocked
  • phase: intake | define-behavior | scenario-gate | implement | done (see ticket-template.md)

Rules:

  • Log immediately after each action
  • Re-read ticket before significant actions
  • For detailed scratch notes, use a separate work log (see Work Logs below)
  • CRITICAL: Never mark done without user confirmation

Work Logs

Purpose: Scratch pad and working memory during execution. Think hard. Keep notes.

Location: .safeword/logs/{artifact-type}-{slug}.md

Naming convention:

Working on...Log file name
Ticket 7K9M3P (slug: foo)ticket-7K9M3P-foo.md
Legacy ticket 080-fix-authticket-080-fix-auth.md
Spec task-add-cachespec-task-add-cache.md
Design doc oauthdesign-oauth.md

One artifact = one log. If log exists, append a new session. Don't spawn multiple logs for the same work.

Create log? Answer IN ORDER, stop at first match:

  1. Executing a plan, ticket, or spec? → Create log
  2. Investigation/debugging with multiple attempts? → Create log
  3. Quick single-action task? → Skip log

Think hard behaviors:

  1. Re-read the log before each major action
  2. Pause to review your approach periodically
  3. Log findings as you discover them, not after
  4. Note dead ends so you don't repeat them

Log what helps you stay on track: findings, decisions, hypotheses, blockers, scratch calculations. Use your discretion.

Edge cases:

SituationAction
Multiple artifacts at onceOne log per artifact (don't combine)
No clear artifact (exploratory)Create explore-{topic}.md, convert to proper artifact when scope clarifies

Templates

Use the matching template when ANY trigger fires:

TriggerTemplate
Planning new feature scope OR creating feature spec./.safeword/templates/feature-spec-template.md
Bug, improvement, refactor, or internal task./.safeword/templates/task-spec-template.md
Need test definitions for a feature OR acceptance criteria./.safeword/templates/test-definitions-feature.md
Feature spans 3+ components OR needs technical spec./.safeword/templates/design-doc-template.md
Making decision with long-term impact OR trade-offs./.safeword/templates/architecture-template.md
Task needs context anchoring./.safeword/templates/ticket-template.md
Starting execution of a plan, ticket, or spec./.safeword/templates/work-log-template.md

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

audit

Free

Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

TheMostlyGreat/mythos19Updated Jun 14, 2026

bdd

Free

Behavior-first feature development — use when building new capabilities, continuing feature work, or when work introduces new state or multiple user flows. Discovers desired behavior through examples and scenarios before implementation. Do NOT use for bug fixes, typos, or small isolated changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

TheMostlyGreat/mythos19Updated Jun 14, 2026

Use when the user wants to explore options, weigh approaches, or think through uncertainty before committing to a direction. Collaborative brainstorming and rubber ducking — divergence-first thinking partner.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

TheMostlyGreat/mythos19Updated Jun 14, 2026

Kill zombie dev servers and test processes. Use when ports are blocked, processes are hanging, or test runners won't start.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

TheMostlyGreat/mythos19Updated Jun 14, 2026

debug

Free

Root cause debugging before fixes. Use when investigating bugs, diagnosing test failures, troubleshooting unexpected behavior, or when previous fix attempts failed. Enforces investigate-first discipline.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

TheMostlyGreat/mythos19Updated Jun 14, 2026

elicit

Free

Extract tacit knowledge through non-obvious microquestions — things only the user knows that can't be found in code, docs, or research. Use when you're about to guess at intent, context, or constraints during SAFEWORD's understanding flow. Also use when user says 'ask me', 'what do you need to know', or when another skill (bdd, brainstorm, debug) needs user context before proceeding. Do NOT use for questions answerable by reading the codebase or searching the web.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

TheMostlyGreat/mythos19Updated Jun 14, 2026

See all skills by TheMostlyGreat

Report a problem with this skill