Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

completion-verification

Verifies a completion, fix, passing, compatibility, release, or readiness claim with fresh task-specific evidence mapped to the actual requirements. Use before saying a change is done, before merge, after review fixes, and at release gates. Not a substitute for diagnosing the cause of a failing check.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md1.8 KB
  • references/evidence-map.md595 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Completion Verification

No completion claim without fresh evidence that can falsify the claim.

Completion gate

  1. State the exact claim and its scope.
  2. Map each requirement to the smallest meaningful evidence: focused test, type check, build, package validation, browser flow, API response, screenshot, database state, static analysis, or independent review.
  3. Run the full relevant command now. Do not rely on an earlier transcript or another agent's report.
  4. Read the output and record exit status, counts, and failures.
  5. Compare what was exercised with what the claim covers.
  6. Report blocked checks, unavailable environments, unrelated failures, and residual risk explicitly.

Use evidence-map.md for multi-surface changes.

Evidence discipline

  • A unit test does not prove deployment or a browser flow.
  • A build does not prove user-visible behavior.
  • A screenshot does not prove keyboard or data correctness.
  • A reviewer report does not prove runtime behavior.
  • One green path does not prove negative and boundary paths.

If a check fails, preserve the failure and hand it to root-cause-debugging. Never weaken, delete, skip, or rewrite a check merely to obtain green output.

Completion condition

Every in-scope acceptance item has a fresh result, every unavailable check is marked as a limit, and the final wording is no broader than the evidence.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Designs or reviews HTTP, REST, GraphQL, RPC, CLI, webhook, event, and service interfaces with explicit inputs, outputs, errors, compatibility, idempotency, pagination, authentication, versioning, and observability. Use when introducing or changing an API or cross-component contract. Not for internal implementation details with no boundary or for debugging one API failure; use root-cause-debugging there.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Reviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Validates a running application, CLI, API, service, or generated artifact as a user or operator against a prewritten observable behavior contract while remaining source-blind. Use for acceptance checks, runtime proof, anti-fake probes, release smoke tests, or an independent companion to code review. Not for source-quality findings, root-cause diagnosis, or visual design judgment outside the contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Closes a completed development branch by checking the final diff and proof, presenting merge, pull-request, keep, or discard options, and cleaning up only after the user or repository workflow chooses a path. Use when feature work is complete and the branch must be integrated or retired. Not for claiming a feature is complete before verification.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Tests a real web user flow with a browser by asserting semantic behavior, network and loading states, keyboard access, responsive layouts, and stable visual evidence. Use for browser bugs, end-to-end UI behavior, responsive or accessibility checks, and screenshot baselines. Not for static source review without a browser or for backend-only tests.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

See all skills by thiientv

Report a problem with this skill