Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

dispatching-parallel-agents

Splits a coding task into independent parallel agent workstreams with disjoint write sets, explicit inputs and outputs, dependency ordering, and a merge/review plan. Use when several subtasks can proceed without shared mutable state. Not for tightly coupled edits, one failing root cause, or parallel changes to the same files.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Dispatching Parallel Agents

Parallelism reduces elapsed time only when it does not multiply integration ambiguity.

Dispatch checklist

  1. Define the shared outcome and acceptance evidence.
  2. Map dependencies and identify the critical path.
  3. Split by coherent responsibility, not arbitrary file count.
  4. Give every agent a disjoint write set and a narrow prompt.
  5. State repository rules, interfaces, expected artifacts, and stop conditions.
  6. Decide who integrates, resolves conflicts, and runs the final proof.

Good units are an independent reference/eval update, a script with its tests, or separate adapters with a stable manifest contract. Bad units are two agents editing the same public skill, guessing an interface that another agent owns, or investigating one symptom with competing hypotheses.

Handoff contract

Each agent returns:

  • files changed;
  • decisions and assumptions;
  • commands run and exact result;
  • known gaps or conflicts;
  • follow-up needed by the integrator.

Treat agent output as untrusted work product. Read the diff and rerun the relevant checks before merging. Do not claim the aggregate task is complete because every agent reported success.

Completion condition

Parallel work is integrated only after interface compatibility, conflict resolution, focused checks, and one fresh aggregate verification pass.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Designs or reviews HTTP, REST, GraphQL, RPC, CLI, webhook, event, and service interfaces with explicit inputs, outputs, errors, compatibility, idempotency, pagination, authentication, versioning, and observability. Use when introducing or changing an API or cross-component contract. Not for internal implementation details with no boundary or for debugging one API failure; use root-cause-debugging there.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Reviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Validates a running application, CLI, API, service, or generated artifact as a user or operator against a prewritten observable behavior contract while remaining source-blind. Use for acceptance checks, runtime proof, anti-fake probes, release smoke tests, or an independent companion to code review. Not for source-quality findings, root-cause diagnosis, or visual design judgment outside the contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Closes a completed development branch by checking the final diff and proof, presenting merge, pull-request, keep, or discard options, and cleaning up only after the user or repository workflow chooses a path. Use when feature work is complete and the branch must be integrated or retired. Not for claiming a feature is complete before verification.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

Tests a real web user flow with a browser by asserting semantic behavior, network and loading states, keyboard access, responsive layouts, and stable visual evidence. Use for browser bugs, end-to-end UI behavior, responsive or accessibility checks, and screenshot baselines. Not for static source review without a browser or for backend-only tests.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

thiientv/godmode98Updated Aug 26, 2026

See all skills by thiientv

Report a problem with this skill