Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

thinking-ooda

Use under time pressure when the situation is still changing and you must act before certainty — cycle Observe→Orient→Decide→Act on ~70% confidence, then re-observe.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

OODA Loop

Core rule: For reversible moves under time pressure, act on ~70% confidence, then immediately re-observe. Cycle faster than the situation compounds; a late perfect plan loses to a fast loop.

When to Use

  • Incident response, outage, or ongoing degradation where state is still moving.
  • Debugging a moving target (intermittent failure, live traffic shift).
  • Any time-bounded decision where waiting for full certainty costs more than a reversible action.

When NOT to Use

  • The situation is static and you have time — deliberate analysis or a hypothesis differential wins.
  • The next action is irreversible or high blast-radius — raise the evidence bar; 70% is not enough.
  • You can cheaply localize the cause (read the failing diff, log, or metric) — test that hypothesis directly instead of looping in the dark.
  • There is no time pressure and no changing environment — OODA adds churn without value.

Procedure

  1. Observe (time-boxed): gather the cheapest high-signal state now — metrics, logs, alerts, recent deploys/config, and feedback from the last action. Cap the window; do not collect forever.
  2. Orient: match observations to a pattern and form ≥2 candidate explanations. Update or discard the mental model when data contradicts it; refuse single-hypothesis lock.
  3. Decide: pick one reversible action that tests the leading hypothesis. State confidence (~70% threshold for reversible moves), the predicted effect, the observation you will check next, and a time box for that check.
  4. Act: execute once, decisively, with a known rollback or degrade path.
  5. Re-observe immediately: compare outcome to prediction within the time box; feed the result into the next Observe. Loop until stable or until the next move is no longer reversible enough for this skill.
  6. Stop condition: exit the loop when the system is stable, the remaining work is static analysis, or the next step requires irreversible commitment — then switch method.

Output

A cycle record (repeat per loop):

  1. Observed — current signals and what changed since last cycle.
  2. Orientation — ≥2 hypotheses; which one leads and why.
  3. Decision — action, confidence, predicted effect, next observation, time box.
  4. Act + result — what ran and what the immediate re-observe showed.
  5. Loop status — continue / stable / escalate out of OODA.

Verification

  • Falsify/stop: if you cannot name a reversible next action and a near-term observation that would refute it, stop looping and gather more evidence or escalate. If re-observe never happens after act, the loop is broken — fix that before another action.
  • Over-application guard: do not OODA static design work, irreversible launches, or cases where a single cheap localization check ends the uncertainty. Do not wait for 100% confidence on reversible mitigations under active incident pressure.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.7KUpdated Aug 8, 2026

Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.7KUpdated Aug 8, 2026

When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.7KUpdated Aug 8, 2026

Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.7KUpdated Aug 8, 2026

When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.7KUpdated Aug 8, 2026

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.7KUpdated Aug 8, 2026

See all skills by tjboudreaux

Report a problem with this skill