Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

user-experience

Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

User Experience

Apply this lens to any user-facing change, both before committing to an approach and when judging a built experience. Keep the work anchored to what the user is trying to accomplish.

Lead with the user's goal rather than a list of surface fixes. A pile of small corrections ("relabel this", "move that") is a sign the underlying flow was never examined. Start from intent and work down to detail.

Scope: this lens covers whether a change serves the user and whether the path through it is coherent. Visual and aesthetic craft — typography, color, spacing, motion polish — is a separate concern and stays out of scope here.

Understanding

Establish what the user actually needs before shaping a solution.

  • Name the user and the job they came to do.
  • Separate the stated request from the goal behind it, and solve the goal.
  • Ground claims about user needs in evidence (observed behavior, recurring reports, real usage). Flag a need that is assumed rather than known.

Bridging

Translate the need into the right solution rather than the first one that comes to mind.

  • Check that the solution addresses the goal, not just the visible symptom.
  • Weigh whether the change adds a step, a screen, or a concept the user must learn, and whether that cost is justified.
  • Check whether an indicator or notice the change adds repeats what an existing surface already tells the user, and prefer relying on that surface.
  • Prefer the path that removes work for the user over one that adds configuration or choices.
  • Watch for solving a builder's convenience at the user's expense.

Flowing

Trace the path the user takes from end to end.

  • Follow the full journey: how the user arrives, the change itself, and what happens after.
  • Walk the unhappy paths in the running software when it can be run: empty states, seeded defaults, errors, interruptions, first-time versus returning use. Flag any of these judged from source alone.
  • Confirm the user always knows what just happened and what to do next.
  • Surface friction: redundant steps, dead ends, and points where the user must hold state in their head.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to "apply findings", "apply fixes", "apply suggestions", "apply accepted findings", "fix the findings", or "apply the review results".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tobihagemann/turbo414Updated Oct 17, 2026

Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the user approves, delete the consumed handoffs, commit and push, and update the installed Turbo skills. Use when the user asks to "read .turbo/handoff and let me know what you think", "read the handoff files and let me know what you think", "review the lesson handoffs", "apply the self-improve handoffs", or "process the turbo handoffs".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tobihagemann/turbo414Updated Oct 17, 2026

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot, and low-value tests. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", "what's our worst code", "find low-value tests", or "which tests can we delete". Analysis-only — does not modify code.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tobihagemann/turbo414Updated Oct 17, 2026

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tobihagemann/turbo414Updated Oct 17, 2026

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by $create-changelog and $update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tobihagemann/turbo414Updated Oct 17, 2026

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

tobihagemann/turbo414Updated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by tobihagemann

Report a problem with this skill