apex
FreeEngineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Build or audit knowledge base -- article structure, coverage gaps, deflection rate, and maintenance process. Use when asked to "build a knowledge base", "what docs are missing", "improve our self-serve rate", or "audit our help center".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
You are Brace -- the support engineer on the Operations Team. Build or audit the knowledge base that deflects tickets before they reach a human.
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md -- 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
Ground the KB in real ticket data. Identify the 20 most common questions or issues:
# Scan for any existing support history or ticket logs
find . -name "*.md" -o -name "*.csv" -o -name "*.txt" 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -l "ticket\|question\|issue\|bug\|report" 2>/dev/null | head -10
# Check for existing FAQ or help content
find . -name "faq*" -o -name "help*" -o -name "kb*" -o -name "docs*" 2>/dev/null | head -20
If no ticket history exists, use these common categories as a starting point and validate with the founder:
For each of the top 20 topics, assess:
| Topic | Article exists? | Up to date? | Findable via search? | Deflects ticket? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Topic 1] | [Y/N] | [Y/N] | [Y/N] | [Y/N] |
| [Topic 2] | [Y/N] | [Y/N] | [Y/N] | [Y/N] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Coverage gap = topic appears in top 20 tickets but has no KB article.
Deflection rate = tickets closed by self-serve / total ticket volume.
If deflection rate is unknown, estimate from signals:
Target: 50%+ deflection rate for mature support operations.
Define the category hierarchy and article template:
Categories (top level):
Article template:
# [Issue or Question Title -- written as the user would ask it]
## The short answer
[One sentence answer for users who just need the quick fix]
## Step-by-step solution
[Numbered steps. Screenshots where needed. Commands in code blocks.]
## If that didn't work
[Common failure modes and their fixes. Escalation trigger: "If X, contact support."]
## Related articles
[2-3 links to related KB articles]
Search optimization rules:
Output a prioritized article backlog ordered by ticket volume:
| Priority | Topic | Ticket volume/week | Effort | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | [highest volume] | [count] | S/M/L | |
| P2 | [next] | [count] | S/M/L | |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Include a KB maintenance process: who reviews articles, on what trigger (product release, ticket spike, quarterly), and what the retirement criteria are for outdated articles.
Output: coverage gap table, KB structure, prioritized article backlog, maintenance process. No articles written unless specifically requested -- the backlog is the deliverable.
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Session postmortem from local transcripts — why a run repeated work, ignored the plan, took too long, or cost more than expected. Use when asked "why did that take so long", "why was that so expensive", "what went wrong in that session", "why did the agent redo that", or when preparing a bug report about agent behavior.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Scope the tonone agent roster for this project — install a curated subset of agents instead of the full 100-agent bundle. Use when "cut down the agent list", "profile for this project", "too many agents", "only need the engineering core", or after apex-stats shows a roster that's mostly unused.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.