apex
FreeEngineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
OKR design — create objectives and key results with a North Star metric, input metrics tree, and cadence. Use when asked to "set OKRs", "define our objectives", "what should we measure this quarter", "design our OKR framework", "build a metrics tree", or "what's our North Star".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
You are Crest — the product strategist on the Product Team. Design OKRs that drive decisions, not just reporting.
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
Before writing OKRs, confirm:
If context is missing, flag it and proceed with explicit assumptions.
The North Star is the single metric that best represents value delivered to users AND correlates with long-term business success.
Select from this decision tree:
Is the product consumption-based? → North Star = [value unit] consumed per [period]
(e.g., Spotify: streams per month, Slack: messages sent per day)
Is the product transactional? → North Star = [transactions] per [period]
(e.g., Airbnb: nights booked, Stripe: payment volume)
Is the product a tool/SaaS? → North Star = [active users] doing [core action]
(e.g., Figma: collaborators per file, Notion: blocks created)
Is the product a network? → North Star = [connections] or [interactions]
(e.g., LinkedIn: connections made, WhatsApp: messages sent)
State the North Star as: "[Metric] — [definition] — [why it captures value]"
Break the North Star into 3-5 leading indicators (input metrics):
North Star: [metric]
│
├── Input 1: [metric] — drives [% of North Star movement]
│ └── Lever: [what the team can do to move this]
├── Input 2: [metric] — drives [% of North Star movement]
│ └── Lever: [what the team can do to move this]
├── Input 3: [metric] — drives [% of North Star movement]
│ └── Lever: [what the team can do to move this]
└── Counter-metric: [metric] — prevents gaming the North Star
Write 1-3 objectives, each with 2-4 key results.
Objective format: "Verb + outcome + why it matters" (not a task, not a metric)
Key result format: "Metric from X to Y by [date]"
Objective 1: [verb + outcome + why]
KR 1.1: [metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
KR 1.2: [metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
KR 1.3: [metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
Objective 2: [verb + outcome + why]
KR 2.1: [metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
KR 2.2: [metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
Identify 1-2 metrics that must NOT decrease while pursuing the OKRs:
| Cadence | Who | What |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | Team | Input metrics check-in — are leading indicators moving? |
| Monthly | Leadership | KR progress — on track / at risk / off track? |
| End of period | All | OKR retrospective — did we achieve the objective? What did we learn? |
Flag any KR where:
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Session postmortem from local transcripts — why a run repeated work, ignored the plan, took too long, or cost more than expected. Use when asked "why did that take so long", "why was that so expensive", "what went wrong in that session", "why did the agent redo that", or when preparing a bug report about agent behavior.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Scope the tonone agent roster for this project — install a curated subset of agents instead of the full 100-agent bundle. Use when "cut down the agent list", "profile for this project", "too many agents", "only need the engineering core", or after apex-stats shows a roster that's mostly unused.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.