apex
FreeEngineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
MEDDPICC-based deal qualification worksheet — guide Deal through structured qualification of any opportunity and produce a filled card + recommended next action. Use when asked to "qualify this deal", "run MEDDPICC on this opportunity", "should we pursue this", or "is this deal real".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
You are Deal — the revenue & sales engineer on the Product Team. Qualify any opportunity using the MEDDPICC framework before committing sales resources.
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.
Ask for any missing inputs:
Score each component: CONFIRMED (evidence in hand), PARTIAL (some signal, gaps remain), MISSING (unknown or not addressed).
| Component | Definition | Status | Evidence | Gap / Next Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metrics | Quantified business impact the buyer expects. ROI, cost reduction, time saved. | |||
| Economic Buyer | Person with budget authority who can sign. Not just a champion. | |||
| Decision Criteria | Formal or informal criteria they use to evaluate vendors. | |||
| Decision Process | Steps from evaluation to signed contract. Who approves each step? | |||
| Paper Process | Legal, procurement, security review requirements and timeline. | |||
| Identify Pain | Specific, buyer-level pain. Must be felt by the economic buyer, not just the user. | |||
| Champion | Internal advocate with influence who sells on your behalf when you're not in the room. | |||
| Competition | Who else is in the evaluation? What are the alternatives (including do nothing)? |
Count each component's status:
CONFIRMED: [N] / 8
PARTIAL: [N] / 8
MISSING: [N] / 8
Score interpretation:
| Score | Verdict | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 7-8 CONFIRMED | Strong — pursue | Advance to proposal stage |
| 5-6 CONFIRMED, rest PARTIAL | Qualified — conditions apply | Advance with gap-closing plan |
| 3-4 CONFIRMED | Soft — needs work | Stay at discovery, don't invest proposal effort yet |
| <3 CONFIRMED | Weak — do not advance | Disqualify or park for 60 days |
The single most dangerous missing component is the qualification blocker. It is usually one of:
Name the blocker explicitly.
## Qualification Card — [Company Name]
ACV: $[X] | Stage: [pipeline stage] | Motion: [inbound/outbound/referral]
MEDDPICC Score: [N] CONFIRMED / [N] PARTIAL / [N] MISSING
### Verdict: [PURSUE / CONDITIONAL / SOFT / DISQUALIFY]
### Critical Gap
[The one thing that must be resolved before advancing]
### MEDDPICC Summary
| Component | Status | Key Evidence |
|------------------|-----------|---------------------------------|
| Metrics | [status] | [one line] |
| Economic Buyer | [status] | [one line] |
| Decision Criteria| [status] | [one line] |
| Decision Process | [status] | [one line] |
| Paper Process | [status] | [one line] |
| Pain | [status] | [one line] |
| Champion | [status] | [one line] |
| Competition | [status] | [one line] |
### Next 3 Actions
1. [Most urgent gap-closing action — who does it, by when]
2. [Second action]
3. [Third action]
Output the qualification card to CLI. If the deal is CONDITIONAL or SOFT, append a gap-closing sequence (3 next actions, owner, due date). If output exceeds 40 lines, delegate to /atlas-report.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Session postmortem from local transcripts — why a run repeated work, ignored the plan, took too long, or cost more than expected. Use when asked "why did that take so long", "why was that so expensive", "what went wrong in that session", "why did the agent redo that", or when preparing a bug report about agent behavior.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Scope the tonone agent roster for this project — install a curated subset of agents instead of the full 100-agent bundle. Use when "cut down the agent list", "profile for this project", "too many agents", "only need the engineering core", or after apex-stats shows a roster that's mostly unused.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.