Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

contrarian-setup-gate

Combine three reports on crowded positions, failed reactions to news, and weekly price reversals into one trading setup status. Identify missing or invalid evidence and determine whether the setup is ready for planning.

OriginalShow the original description

Synthesize the three Jason Shapiro contrarian-pipeline verdicts (COT crowding, news-reaction failure, weekly price-action confirmation) into one actionable setup_status via a fail-closed precedence state machine. Pure, offline synthesis -- no network, no API keys, no computation beyond validation and precedence.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Combine three contrarian strategy reports
  • Check which confirmations are still missing
  • Find stale or inconsistent input reports
  • Prepare confirmed inputs for position sizing

Files included (8)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB
  • references/gate-decision-table.md21.3 KB
  • requirements.txt70 B
  • scripts/gate_logic.py40.1 KB
  • scripts/run_contrarian_setup_gate.py15.7 KB
  • scripts/tests/conftest.py226 B
  • scripts/tests/test_gate_logic.py52.4 KB
  • scripts/tests/test_run_contrarian_setup_gate.py41.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Contrarian Setup Gate

Overview

Synthesize the outputs of Jason Shapiro's 3-step contrarian process into one actionable state. cot-contrarian-detector (step 1) flags crowded positioning, news-reaction-failure-analyzer (step 2) tests whether the market failed to react to news favorable to the crowd, and technical-analyst's contrarian-confirmation mode (step 3) confirms weekly price-action evidence of a reversal. This gate reads those three report JSONs and applies an explicit, exhaustively-tested precedence rule set to produce one setup_status, with a fail-closed reason attached to every input that could not be confirmed.

The gate does no fetching, no API calls, and no computation beyond validating and combining the three inputs it is given. It is the pipeline's synthesis center, not a data source.

When to Use

  • After running cot-contrarian-detector (always required -- this is the pipeline's entry point)
  • Mid-pipeline, with only the detector report, to see the CROWDED state and what steps remain
  • After running news-reaction-failure-analyzer, to see whether the setup advances to WATCHING_PRICE or is REJECTED
  • After running technical-analyst's contrarian-confirmation mode, to see whether the setup reaches READY_FOR_PLAN
  • Before handing a symbol's direction and stop level to a position-sizing skill

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+
  • No API keys -- this skill is fully offline
  • A cot-contrarian-detector JSON report for the symbol under evaluation (required)
  • Optionally, a news-reaction-failure-analyzer JSON report for the same symbol (step 2)
  • Optionally, a technical-analyst contrarian-confirmation JSON report for the same symbol (step 3)

Workflow

Step 1: Run the Gate

python3 skills/contrarian-setup-gate/scripts/run_contrarian_setup_gate.py \
  --symbol B6 \
  --detector-json reports/cot_crowding_2026-07-12.json \
  --news-json reports/nrf_B6_2026-07-12.json \
  --price-action-json reports/ta_confirmation_B6_2026-07-12.json \
  --as-of 2026-07-15 \
  --output-dir reports/

--symbol and --detector-json are required; --news-json and --price-action-json are optional -- omit either to see the state at that pipeline stage. --as-of is required (no implicit "today"): staleness is always evaluated against an explicit reference date so reruns are deterministic.

Exit behavior is intentionally asymmetric: a missing or malformed --as-of (or any other CLI usage error) is an operator config mistake, so the CLI exits 2 with usage text and writes no report. A problem with one of the three untrusted report files -- unreadable, malformed, stale, inconsistent -- is always handled fail-closed instead: the CLI exits 0 and writes a report naming the reason, exactly like every other skill in this pipeline.

Step 2: Read the Setup Status

StatusMeaningNext Step
READY_FOR_PLANAll three steps confirmed; direction, entry_trigger, and invalidation_level are populatedHand direction and invalidation_level to a position-sizing skill
WATCHING_PRICECrowding + news confirmed; price action still pendingRun technical-analyst's contrarian-confirmation mode
CROWDEDCrowding confirmed; news and/or price still pendingRun news-reaction-failure-analyzer
REJECTEDCrowding is NOT_CONFIRMED (classification NEUTRAL), or news/price came back NOT_CONFIRMEDStop -- do not run further steps for this symbol/direction
INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCEA required input is missing, unreadable, stale, inconsistent, or could not itself reach a verdictStop -- fix or regenerate the named input before rerunning

missing_confirmations lists every step still blocking, with its state and reason. warnings never change the status -- they flag audit-worthy conditions such as a MEDIUM-confidence confirming signal or a near-stale input.

Step 3: Act on READY_FOR_PLAN Only

At READY_FOR_PLAN, direction (SHORT/LONG, the fade side of the crowd), entry_trigger (a factual echo of the confirming weekly signal), and invalidation_level (the stop reference from the price-action report) are populated. gate_confidence is the weaker of the news and price-action confidences (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW -- LOW is a token both upstream skills document as reserved but never actually emit; the gate accepts it and ranks it weakest rather than rejecting it as unknown). Position sizing is the next pipeline stage (not yet built as of this skill's release -- see the roadmap in the repository's workflow docs); this gate never places or recommends an order.

Precedence (Summary)

Each step is evaluated in strict pipeline order -- crowding, then news, then price-action -- and each step fully settles before the next step's file is even consulted. An earlier step's definitive verdict is never softened by a later step's problem.

  1. Crowding is evaluated first and exclusively: INVALID/INSUFFICIENT crowding is always INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE; a NOT_CONFIRMED (NEUTRAL) classification is always REJECTED, regardless of any downstream file's state or corruption.
  2. With crowding CONFIRMED, news is evaluated next, on its own: INVALID (unreadable, malformed, stale, symbol mismatch, direction mismatch, unsupported schema) forces INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE; NOT_CONFIRMED forces REJECTED; INSUFFICIENT forces INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE -- in every one of these cases, price-action is never even inspected for the decision.
  3. Once news is CONFIRMED (or PENDING, for out-of-order use), price-action is evaluated last, with the same four-way settlement. Running price-action before news (out-of-order pipeline use) caps the status at CROWDED with a warning -- a NOT_CONFIRMED price-action verdict still REJECTs even out of order, since price-action is still fully evaluated in that branch.
  4. Crowding confirmed, both downstream steps pending -> CROWDED.
  5. Crowding + news confirmed, price-action pending -> WATCHING_PRICE.
  6. All three confirmed -> READY_FOR_PLAN.

See references/gate-decision-table.md for the full decision table (every reachable {crowding} x {news} x {price-action} state combination), the reason-token glossary, and worked examples.

Output Contract

The script writes contrarian_setup_gate_<SYMBOL>_<as-of>.json and .md to --output-dir:

symbol: B6
setup_status: READY_FOR_PLAN | WATCHING_PRICE | CROWDED | REJECTED | INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE
direction: SHORT | LONG | null
gate_confidence: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | null
entry_trigger: string | null
invalidation_level: number | null
missing_confirmations: [{step, state, reason}, ...]
warnings: [string, ...]
inputs:
  crowding: {state, classification, data_date, age_days, report_path}
  news_failure: {state, verdict, confidence, verdict_reason, as_of, age_days, report_path}
  price_action: {state, verdict, confidence, verdict_reason, stop_reference, as_of, age_days, report_path}
run_context: {symbol, as_of, max_detector_age_days, max_report_age_days, schema_version, skill}

Every input's state is one of CONFIRMED, NOT_CONFIRMED, INSUFFICIENT, PENDING (report not provided), or INVALID (a report was provided but is unusable -- unreadable, malformed, stale, or inconsistent with the other inputs; always carries a named reason).

Guardrails

  1. Never places or recommends orders. READY_FOR_PLAN is the furthest state this skill reaches. Order entry and position sizing are separate, downstream decisions.
  2. INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE and REJECTED never advance. No warning, confidence, or partial input ever pushes the status past what the precedence rules allow.
  3. Fail closed on every input, always. An unreadable, malformed, stale, symbol-mismatched, or unknown-enum report is never treated as a pass -- it is named and blocks or downgrades the status. This includes the price-action report's verdict_reason (allowlisted against technical-analyst's actual confirming-signal vocabulary, not merely type-checked) and its stop_reference (must be a finite, positive number -- never non-finite, zero, negative, or a boolean). Before any of the three report files reaches this validation, the CLI also rejects a file outright (reason <input>_non_finite) if it contains a non-finite number (Infinity/-Infinity/NaN, including an ordinary-looking number like 1e309 that overflows on parse) ANYWHERE in it, not just in a field the gate reads -- this is what keeps every report a valid, complete JSON file even under adversarial input.
  4. READY_FOR_PLAN always carries a usable plan. entry_trigger is guaranteed non-empty and invalidation_level is guaranteed a finite positive number whenever the status is READY_FOR_PLAN -- enforced both by input validation and by a defensive invariant check.
  5. Not investment advice. entry_trigger and invalidation_level are factual echoes of the upstream price-action report, not recommendations.

Resources

  • scripts/run_contrarian_setup_gate.py -- CLI: hardened JSON loading (unreadable / parse_error incl. RecursionError / non_finite via an iterative whole-file scan), report generation
  • scripts/gate_logic.py -- Pure synthesis core: normalization (incl. malformed-shape detection), consistency checks, the precedence state machine
  • references/gate-decision-table.md -- Full decision table, reason-token glossary, worked examples (including the real B6 REJECTED case)

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

backtest-expert

FreeSummary

Plan and assess backtests, which test trading rules against historical data. Examine sensitivity to rule changes, trading costs, and data bias, then use supplied performance metrics to generate a structured evaluation with reasons that block adoption.

  • Define a backtesting plan for rule-based trading
  • Test sensitivity to parameters and trading costs
  • Investigate suspiciously strong backtest results
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills3.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Assess how broadly US stock market gains are shared across stocks using public CSV data and optional charts. Produce English reports covering market conditions, trading signals, scenarios, and positioning for different investment timeframes.

  • Checking how broadly US stocks are participating in a market rise
  • Reviewing medium- to long-term market positioning
  • Assessing short-term swing trading signals
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills3.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Analyze chart images showing how broadly US stocks are participating in market trends. Assess medium-term conditions and short-term signals, then produce an English report with positioning guidance, alternative scenarios, and risks based on the visible data.

  • Assessing the market cycle from an S&P 500 breadth chart
  • Checking short-term signals in an uptrend stock ratio chart
  • Comparing medium-term and short-term market signals
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills3.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Turn VCP screening results, which identify narrowing price swings, into breakout trade plans. Calculate entry, stop-loss, target prices, and position sizes using worst-case entries, while applying portfolio risk limits and producing Alpaca-compatible order templates.

  • Planning entries, stop-losses, and profit targets for VCP candidates
  • Calculating position sizes from account size and risk limits
  • Checking total portfolio risk and sector exposure
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills3.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

canslim-screener

FreeSummary

Screen US growth stocks with William O'Neil's CANSLIM method, which evaluates seven factors including earnings, price strength, trading volume, and market direction. Receive ranked candidates with composite scores, factor breakdowns, market warnings, and data quality notes.

  • Find US stocks with earnings growth and price momentum
  • Compare a chosen list of stocks using CANSLIM scores
  • Screen a sector-focused stock list
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills3.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Screen futures markets for unusually crowded speculative positions using COT reports, which track traders’ holdings. Compare three-year and 26-week positioning measures, produce ranked reports, and identify markets for further contrarian research without generating trade signals.

  • Finding futures markets with crowded speculative positions
  • Checking positioning in a specific futures market
  • Reviewing weekly changes in speculative holdings
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills3.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by tradermonty

Report a problem with this skill