Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

gate-check

Find the decisions in a pipeline that do not need the expensive model and propose the gate for each: a rule, a classic classifier, or a small model, with fail-closed routing. Use when the user asks to cut model costs or latency, says the big model handles everything, or wants a triage / routing / filter layer in front of an agent. Analysis plus an optional baseline scaffold. Do NOT use for auditing context layout (context-audit) or for building eval suites (evals-bootstrap).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Find the gates

Theory: Cheap decisions and Gate practice. An agent does two kinds of work: it writes, which needs a big model, and it decides — is this spam, which queue, does this need a person — which is a bounded question the answer to which comes from a set you already know. A gate is a cheap decision layer that sorts the stream so the expensive model only sees the items that actually need judgement.

Workflow

  1. Map the decisions. Read the pipeline's entry points and prompts and list every decision made before or during a model call: classification, routing, filtering, yes/no triage, priority, language, "is this even for us". Ignore the writing — only bounded decisions with a known label set.
  2. Count what each costs today. For each decision currently made by the big model: calls per day if known, tokens per call, and what a wrong answer costs. A decision worth one bit that burns a frontier call is the headline finding.
  3. Propose the cheapest gate that can hold it, in rising order of cost:
    • a rule — regex, allowlist, header check: free, instant, blind to anything unanticipated; always the first layer, never the last
    • a classic classifier — logistic regression or similar over simple features, trained on a few hundred labelled examples: milliseconds, fractions of a cent, and the baseline every fancier option must beat
    • a small / System One model — when the input is too varied for features but the output is still a label with a confidence score
  4. Route fail-closed. Every gate needs a confidence threshold, and doubt goes down the safe path: unsure means escalate to the big model (or a person), never means guess. Say explicitly what each gate's unsure route is.
  5. Offer the baseline scaffold. If the user wants to proceed, generate the module's thirty-minute exercise for their data: a label.py that samples ~200 real examples for hand-labelling, and a baseline.py that trains the classic classifier and prints accuracy against a held-out split. Every vendor claim and small-model option must beat this number on their data before it earns a place in the pipeline.

Output format

Gate check — <pipeline>
decisions found: <n>, currently on the big model: <n>

1. <decision> — <where in the code>
   today: <who decides, est. cost>   label set: <the labels>
   gate: <rule | classifier | small model> — <why this tier>
   unsure -> <escalation path>
   saves: <est. calls/tokens diverted>
...

Rank by savings. If a decision genuinely needs the big model — open-ended, no stable label set, wrong answers are cheap to fix — say so and leave it alone; a gate that guesses is worse than no gate.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Audit an agent's context layout against the four places: system prompt, tools, history, tail. Use when the user asks to audit, review or fix their agent's context, prompt caching, token spend per turn, or CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md layout. Read-only: reports findings and a fix list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for writing evals (evals-bootstrap) or for loop design (goal-test).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1.1KUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Scaffold a first eval suite for an agent: mine real failures into cases, write behavioural checks over traces, and generate the runner. Use when the user wants evals, regression tests for an agent, a golden set, or asks how to know a prompt/model change did not break things. Do NOT use for a single task's done-check (goal-test) or for auditing context (context-audit).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1.1KUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Turn a vague task into a testable definition of done and generate an executable goal-test script for it, optionally with a bounded retry loop around a headless agent. Use when the user wants to run an agent in a loop, asks how to know when an agent task is finished, or says a goal like "improve X" needs to become checkable. Do NOT use for building eval suites over many cases — that is evals-bootstrap.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1.1KUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Audit an agent's harness against the four rings: containment, guides, sensors, permissions. Use when the user asks whether their agent setup is safe, wants a review of sandboxing / permissions / hooks / AGENTS.md guardrails, or asks what a bad session could break. Read-only: reports the blast radius and a hardening list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for context layout (context-audit) or cost routing (gate-check).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1.1KUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Import a large archive into the vault in controlled batches: triage what is worth ingesting, process oldest first, checkpoint after every batch, and keep cost visible. Use this skill whenever the user wants to import years of bookmarks, an export from another notes app, a downloads folder, a chat history dump, or says "backfill", "bulk import", "process my archive". Do NOT use for ingesting one or a few new sources, which is second-brain-ingest.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1.1KUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Trace where the user's recorded position on something has shifted: superseded claims, contradictions between sources of different dates, and what evidence moved them. Use this skill when the user asks what they have changed their mind about, how their thinking on a topic developed, what they used to believe, or wants a quarterly look back at their own positions. Do NOT use for finding contradictions between sources with no time dimension, or for a current-state answer.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

undefined-ui/second-brain-os1.1KUpdated Oct 14, 2026

See all skills by undefined-ui

Report a problem with this skill