Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

fix-verification

Comprehensive fix verification methodology to ensure bugs are truly fixed. Use after implementing any bug fix to verify it works and hasn't caused regressions. Keywords: verify, confirm, test, validate, check, ensure, regression, fixed

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md9.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

✅ Fix Verification Skill

Philosophy: A bug isn't fixed until it's verified. Twice.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • You've implemented a bug fix
  • Someone else's fix needs verification
  • Deploying a fix to production
  • Bug was high-impact and needs thorough verification
  • Previous fixes for this bug have failed

Do NOT use this skill when:

  • Just exploring code (no fix yet)
  • Bug is trivial (e.g., typo fix)
  • Running standard CI (automated verification)

Prerequisites

Before starting:

  • Fix has been implemented
  • You know the expected behavior
  • You can reproduce the original bug (or have a failing test)
  • You have access to test environment

Process

Phase 1: DIRECT VERIFICATION 🎯

Goal: Confirm the fix addresses the exact reported issue.

Steps:

  1. Recreate the Original Bug Scenario

    Exact steps that caused the bug:
    1. [step 1]
    2. [step 2]
    3. [step 3]
    
    Expected result: [what should happen]
    Previous result: [what was happening - the bug]
    
  2. Execute Test with Fix Applied

    • Follow exact same steps
    • Document actual result
    • Compare to expected
  3. Verify the FIX, Not Just Absence of Error

    ❌ "It doesn't crash anymore" (incomplete)
    ✅ "It returns the expected user object with correct fields" (complete)
    
  4. Test Multiple Times

    • Run at least 3 times
    • Note any inconsistency

Verification Checklist:

  • Original bug scenario no longer produces error
  • Expected behavior now occurs
  • Result is consistent across multiple runs
  • All variations of bug scenario work

Phase 2: EDGE CASE VERIFICATION 🔲

Goal: Ensure fix works for edge cases and variations.

Steps:

  1. Identify Edge Cases

    edge_cases:
      boundary_values:
        - Empty input
        - Maximum length input
        - Minimum valid input
        - Just over limit
        - Just under limit
      
      special_inputs:
        - Null/undefined
        - Special characters
        - Unicode/emoji
        - Numbers as strings
        - Whitespace only
      
      state_variations:
        - First time user
        - Returning user
        - Admin user
        - Concurrent users
        - High load
    
  2. Create Edge Case Matrix

    Edge CaseInputExpectedActualPass?
    Empty""Error msg
    Max length1000 charsSuccess
    Special chars"<>&"Escaped
  3. Test Each Edge Case

    • Document results
    • Note any failures

Edge Case Checklist:

  • All boundary values tested
  • Special inputs handled correctly
  • Different user states work
  • Concurrent access works (if applicable)

Phase 3: REGRESSION TESTING 🔄

Goal: Ensure fix hasn't broken anything else.

Steps:

  1. Identify Affected Areas

    affected_areas:
      directly_affected:
        - The fixed function/component
        - Its callers
        - Its dependencies
      
      indirectly_affected:
        - Related features
        - Shared utilities used
        - Configuration changes
    
  2. Run Targeted Tests

    # Run tests for affected module
    npm test -- --grep "auth"
    
    # Run integration tests
    npm run test:integration
    
  3. Run Full Test Suite

    # Ensure no regressions anywhere
    npm test
    
  4. Manual Smoke Test

    • Test main user flows
    • Pay attention to anything that feels different

Regression Checklist:

  • All unit tests pass
  • All integration tests pass
  • Smoke test passes
  • No new warnings in logs
  • Performance not degraded

Phase 4: NEGATIVE TESTING 🚫

Goal: Verify error handling and failure modes.

Steps:

  1. Test Invalid Inputs

    • What happens with bad data?
    • Are errors handled gracefully?
    • Are error messages helpful?
  2. Test Failure Scenarios

    failure_scenarios:
      - Database connection lost
      - API timeout
      - Invalid credentials
      - Missing permissions
      - Disk full
    
  3. Test Recovery

    • Does system recover after failure?
    • Is data consistent after recovery?

Negative Testing Checklist:

  • Invalid inputs produce clear errors
  • System fails gracefully
  • Recovery works correctly
  • No security information leaked in errors

Phase 5: ENVIRONMENT VERIFICATION 🌍

Goal: Ensure fix works across all environments.

Steps:

  1. Test Across Environments

    EnvironmentTestedResultNotes
    Local dev
    CI/CD
    Staging
    Production
  2. Test Across Configurations

    • Different browsers (if applicable)
    • Different OS (if applicable)
    • Different database sizes
    • Different load levels
  3. Test Across User Types

    • Regular users
    • Admin users
    • New users
    • Users with existing data

Environment Checklist:

  • Works in development
  • Works in staging
  • Works in production (or production-like)
  • Works across configurations

Phase 6: DOCUMENTATION & SIGN-OFF 📝

Goal: Document verification and get sign-off.

Steps:

  1. Complete Verification Report

    ## Fix Verification Report
    
    **Bug ID:** [ID]
    **Fix Description:** [brief description]
    **Verified By:** [name]
    **Date:** [date]
    
    ### Direct Verification
    - [x] Original bug no longer occurs
    - [x] Expected behavior confirmed
    
    ### Edge Cases
    - [x] [edge case 1] - PASS
    - [x] [edge case 2] - PASS
    
    ### Regression Testing
    - [x] Unit tests: 100% pass
    - [x] Integration tests: 100% pass
    - [x] Smoke test: PASS
    
    ### Environment Testing
    - [x] Local: PASS
    - [x] Staging: PASS
    - [x] Production: [pending/pass]
    
    ### Sign-off
    - [ ] Developer
    - [ ] QA (if applicable)
    - [ ] Stakeholder (for critical bugs)
    
  2. Update Bug Tracking

    • Change status to "Verified Fixed"
    • Add verification notes
    • Link to any new tests added
  3. Add/Update Tests

    • Ensure test exists for this bug
    • Test should fail without fix, pass with fix

Quick Verification Checklist

For simpler bugs, use this shortened checklist:

## Quick Verification

- [ ] Original bug scenario fixed
- [ ] Edge cases work
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] No new warnings/errors
- [ ] Reviewed by another person (if critical)

Verification Decision Tree

Fix Implemented
      │
      ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Does original   │
│ scenario work?  │
└────────┬────────┘
    YES  │  NO → Back to debugging
         ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Edge cases      │
│ work?           │
└────────┬────────┘
    YES  │  NO → Expand fix
         ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ All tests       │
│ pass?           │
└────────┬────────┘
    YES  │  NO → Fix regressions
         ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Works in all    │
│ environments?   │
└────────┬────────┘
    YES  │  NO → Environment-specific fix
         ▼
   VERIFIED ✅

Guidelines

DO ✅

  • Verify the fix, not just absence of error
  • Test edge cases thoroughly
  • Document your verification
  • Run the full test suite
  • Have someone else verify critical fixes

DON'T ❌

  • Assume fix works because code looks right
  • Skip edge case testing
  • Forget to check for regressions
  • Test only in development environment
  • Skip documentation

Common Pitfalls

"Works on My Machine"

Problem: Fix works locally but fails elsewhere.

Prevention:

  • Always test in staging
  • Use same data/config as production
  • Test with production-like load

"Fixed the Symptom, Not the Bug"

Problem: Error is gone but behavior is still wrong.

Prevention:

  • Verify POSITIVE behavior, not just absence of error
  • Compare to expected behavior documentation
  • Test the complete user flow

"Created a New Bug"

Problem: Fix introduced a regression.

Prevention:

  • Always run full test suite
  • Manual smoke test of related features
  • Review changes with fresh eyes

Success Criteria

Before marking bug as fixed:

  • Original issue verified fixed
  • All edge cases pass
  • No regression in tests
  • Works in all environments
  • Verification documented
  • Test added to prevent recurrence

Related Skills

  • skills/kilo-kit/debugging/systematic/ - For finding the bug
  • skills/kilo-kit/debugging/root-cause/ - For understanding why it happened
  • skills/kilo-kit/quality/testing/ - For writing better tests

Fix Verification Skill v1.0.0 — Verified twice, deployed once

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

2D game development principles. Sprites, tilemaps, physics, camera.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp28Updated Sep 13, 2026

3D game development principles. Rendering, shaders, physics, cameras.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp28Updated Sep 13, 2026

Create aesthetically beautiful interfaces following proven design principles. Use when building UI/UX, analyzing designs from inspiration sites, generating design images with ai-multimodal, implementing visual hierarchy and color theory, adding micro-interactions, or creating design documentation. Includes workflows for capturing and analyzing inspiration screenshots with chrome-devtools and ai-multimodal, iterative design image generation until aesthetic standards are met, and comprehensive design system guidance covering BEAUTIFUL (aesthetic principles), RIGHT (functionality/accessibility), SATISFYING (micro-interactions), and PEAK (storytelling) stages. Integrates with chrome-devtools, ai-multimodal, media-processing, ui-styling, and web-frameworks skills.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp28Updated Sep 13, 2026

Use when implementing or managing persistent, hierarchical memory systems for AI agents. Covers cross-session state, fact supersession, and self-managed memory tools to enable long-term recall and adaptive agent behavior.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp28Updated Sep 13, 2026

Use when monitoring, tracing, or debugging agentic workflows in production. Keywords: observability, tracing, OpenTelemetry, Langfuse, latency, token cost, loop detection, telemetry.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp28Updated Sep 13, 2026

Use when building self-correcting retrieval systems for AI agents. Keywords: RAG, retrieval, Corrective RAG, Self-RAG, query decomposition, reranking, hallucination, grounding.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp28Updated Sep 13, 2026

See all skills by VoDaiLocz

Report a problem with this skill